On January 15th, 2018, the defendant, Mary Taylor, was accused of refusing to serve the plaintiff, Brianna Banks, at Mary’s Diner located in downtown Atlanta. Ms Banks, an African American woman, claimed that she walked into the diner, sat herself as customers were directed to do, and, after 20 minutes of waiting in the diner during what she described as a “slow time”, was not helped by Ms Taylor. Banks then proceeded to get up from her table, caused a loud altercation with the hostess at the diner, accusing the business of being racist and claiming that “if her skin was white, she would have been helped within seconds”, and then exited the establishment. After leaving the diner, Brianna Banks went home and did some research on Mary Taylor, …show more content…
Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation in 1977, The Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation contracted with the Village of Arlington Heights to build racially integrated low-and moderate-income housing in Arlington Heights, Illinois, however, Arlington’s planning commission denied the zoning permits (Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 1977). The MHDC challenged their decision, claiming it was racially motivated and discriminatory (Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 1977). Many African American plaintiffs would be negatively impacted by the denial of the MHDC’s request. The case was brought to the US Supreme Court, where they decided that, although the impact of the decision would hurt minority groups more than caucasian individuals, no evidence of an intended racially motivated choice was present (Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, …show more content…
The effects of the circumstances may have appeared to be racially motivated by the plaintiffs because they happened to negatively impact minorities, but this was not done consciously, and does not mean that the defendants themselves are racist or prejudice towards minority groups. Even if what took place in Mary’s diner on January 15th upset Ms Banks, Ms Taylor didn’t mean for that to happen, regardless of Ms Banks’ race, and therefore cannot be charged as such. Although Taylor had a past association with a racist organization, she confidently states that she no longer has the same beliefs or morals that she did during that dark time in her life when she dealt with a controlling husband who she has since divorced, and has not identified as a part of that group in over 10 years. Because there is no proof of any racially discriminatory intent, the case should rule that Ms Taylor is not
The Similarities between The scottsboro case and To Kill a Mockingbird From books to real life cases, one can see the American system of injustice towards the blacks of America and its lopsided juries. A system of which if you’re born of the wrong skin, you are judged with no crime being committed. A country where when you have a dark complexion, you are guilty until proven innocent. In To Kill a Mockingbird and Scottsboro boys, we meet different figures who all in common, are prejudice, racist, and ignorant. Even so, we still meet people who stand for what is right, especially since the evidence points towards their innocence.
The violation of statutory provisions by a landlord can qualify as a proximate cause for injuries to tenants in the case the surrounding environment was insecure and there was clear knowledge of intrusions into the given residential area. Ten Associates v. McCutchen Fla. App., 398 So.2d 860 (Fla.App. Ct. 1981). The landlord was legally obligated to positively respond to the plight of the tenants as their lease agreement put him responsible for any required repairs within the common area. The tenants, including Parker, had made numerous attempts to inform him of increased frequency of intrusion due to a broken deadbolt lock that he was mandated, according to the provisions of the statute, to promptly repair.
Williamson later filed a complaint with IAD that Bozeman had retaliated against her for her complaint against McLeod. She advised she was shunned, taunted and given a less desirable assignment that caused her to lose overtime possibilities. IAD eventually found her sexual harassment to be not sustained and McLeod only received a written reprimand and Bozeman faced no disciplinary action. Williamson filed an EEOC complaint and this led to suit against the City of Houston. A jury ruled in Williamson’s favor and she was awarded lost compensation and punitive damages.
In the case NAACP v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue, a fire department in New Jersey adhered to a residency requirement for firefighters that proved to be unsound and resulted in a disparate impact on African-Americans. This particular requirement affected all firefighter candidates and covered only the date of hiring; therefore, once the firefighters were hired, they were free to live anywhere, including outside of the district. There was evidence in this case that suggested 37.4% of protected service positions are held by African-Americans in the area. With this evidence, an individual would be led to believe that around 121 of North Hudson firefighters were African-American, when in fact, there were only two employed (“NAACP v N
According to Dent v. City of Dallas, the court ruled that police officers performing discretionary duties in good faith and acting within the course and scope of their employment are immune from personal liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity. The question that is presented in this situation is whether or not the police officer was acting within his course and scope of his employment. As a nation we have endowed our police officers with the right and authority to enforce the laws on whom they choose. Whether or not we reach the realization to this reality however is another story. The police officer has to use his ability on whom to arrest and not arrest responsibly because his actions do affect society.
Actions that led community members to experience shock, per the extreme and outrageous conduct element of the rule, were categorized as “extreme and outrageous.” In KOVR-TV v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 431 (Cal. 1993), a report’s behavior was constituted as extreme out outrages, when he informed unaccompanied minors that their next-door neighbor killed her children and then committed suicide (Id. at 432, 433). Saxenmeyer (KOVR-TV reporter) “interrogated” three children, under the age of twelve without adult supervision, as to the activities happening outside (Id. at 432).
The case of Emmett Till was one that shook the nation to the core. His murder forced the American people to finally come face-to-face with one of their biggest problems: racism. Emmett Till, a fourteen year old black boy from Chicago, was killed on the account of Carolyn Bryant, the white woman who accused Till of assaulting her in 1955. A little over sixty years after her incriminating word, Bryant came forward in a recent book, “The Blood of Emmett Till,” and confessed to lying about her original accounts. In the article Black Lives, White Lies and Emmett Till, the author uses background information on the case and relies on American history to inform the reader on the injustice that was caused by one lie.
Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Criminal Justice Stevenson through his book has provided various examples that show that people of color and low-income individuals are more likely to be presumed fully prior to presenting their cases. The author has stated that executions are a good example of how norms and policies are used for the purposes of punishing and controlling the people of color For instance, he argues that one in three black people are expected to be sent to jail in their lifetime. Further on, eighty percent of people on death row are black while 65 percent of homicide victims are black.
Although many claim within one year of her death not much has changed legally, there is still justice to be handled in court. Yet the image of Breonna Taylor has changed the hearts and minds of those unaware of the daily racial injustices happening. In wake of this impactful image petitions, donations, and protests spread the importance of her life and death. Taylors image on ‘O magazine’ made her a known face and name across the nation. Winfrey’s decision to make Taylor the front cover image showed importance and the relevance to other racial injustices happening during the height of the BLM
I watched a documentary film “The Central Park Five” for this week’s field experience. The movie examines a 1989 case of five black and Latino teenagers who were convicted of raping a White woman in Central Park, NY. Compared to the research above, the five young male were guilty because of outside racism. The movie provides background, interviews, expert analysis, and details of associated facts related to the case. The five young men were forced and threatened to write their crime “story” but no one doubted their confession even though there was no DNA test results.
Race is one the most sensitive and controversial topics of our time. As kids, we were taught that racism has gotten better as times has passed. However, the author, Michelle Alexander, of The New Jim Crow proposes the argument that racism has not gotten better, but the form of racism that we known in textbooks is not the racism we experience today. Michelle Alexander has countless amounts of plausible arguments, but she has failed to be a credible author, since she doesn’t give enough citations or evidence for her argument to convince people who may not have prior agreement with her agreement.. Alexander’s biggest mistake when it came to being a credible author was starting off the book with a countless number of claims without any evidence in her Introduction.
Michelle Alexander proceeds with another rhetorical question to allow the audience to further reflect on the current situation and stress the corruption of the justice system “If McCleskey’s evidence was not enough to prove discrimination in the absence of some kind of racist utterance, what would be?” (Alexander 67). She uses facts and statistics prior to this “the researchers found that defendants charged with killing white victims were 4.3 times more likely to receive a death sentence than defendants charged with killing blacks” (Dissenting 321; referenced by Alexander 67) to assert evidence of the racial profiling present in the American justice system. The persuasive technique is used to assert her opinion towards the audience by relating
In 1987 an African-American male, Timothy Foster, was convicted of murdering a Caucasian female in Georgia and was sentenced to death (Vogue 2016). The prisoner’s appeal process worked its way up to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that he was convicted because of racial prejudice (Vogue 2016). Notes obtained from the prosecutors of the case revealed that they did not select certain jurors because they were black and that the jury was all white (Vogue 2016). The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Timothy, which was in accordance with the already established anti-discrimination precedents set by the 14th amendment and the 1986 Supreme Court decision in Batson v. Kentucky (Vogue 2016). This case is important for several reasons.
Mary Church Terrell Mary Church Terrell lived to experience two of the most important turns in African American history. She was born nine months after the Emancipation of Proclamation and died two months after the Brown vs. Board of Education decision. Terrell was a civil rights leader and educator. She organized groups, lectured, and fought to better the lives of Africa American women throughout her life.
Public Policy on Housing Discrimination Executive Summary Housing discrimination and segregation have long been present in the American society (Lamb and Wilk). The ideals of public housing and home buying have always been intertwined with the social and political transformation of America, especially in terms of segregation and inequality of capital and race (Wyly, Ponder and Nettking). Nevertheless, the recent unrest in Ferguson, Missouri and in Baltimore due to alleged police misconduct resulting to deaths of black men brought light on the impoverished conditions in urban counties in America (Lemons). This brings questions to the effectiveness of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in devising more fair-housing facilities (Jost).