ipl-logo

Categorical Imperative Essay

1086 Words5 Pages

According to Kant’s point of view, a critical subject endowed with rational capacities is a sufficient condition for freedom. Reason ought to be seen as the highest priority in morality (Scruton, 2001, p.60), and it is the reason why Kant has often emphasized rationality and reason in his works.

One of the most mentioned philosophical concepts from Kant is categorical imperative. Kant regards the concept of categorical imperative as a universal law, which is possible to make adoption in all rational beings. (Hunter, 2001, p.306) There is no exception for rational individuals in the world to escape from the law of categorical imperative. The presentation of categorical imperative is somehow like a test of morality (Hunter, 2001, p.306), rather than just a moral concept. Moral maxim is of vital necessity in the determination of morality for an action. From Kant’s view, an action can be treated as moral when it is motivated by one’s maxim, while it also suits the universal law. (Hunter, 2001, p.306) Therefore, it can be concluded that moral maxim is the standard of deciding whether an action is moral or not. Rational individuals can …show more content…

(Scruton, 2001, p.80) People have free will to subject themselves to objective, ethical, moral law. Kant developed his concept of autonomy in which rational individuals able to overcome heteronomous factors, especially include one’s own desire and interest. These elements may trigger conflict with reason and rationality of oneself. (Scruton, 2001, p.80) In this case, reason become a essential factor to how people act morally. Reason has the ability to govern freedom, and therefore it also determines behaviors. (Scruton, 2001, p.80) Freedom also has the power of proposing an end to one’s actions and behaviors. (Scruton, 2001, p.79) The self-subjection autonomy to the moral law embodies the possibility of harmony in subjective desire and

Show More
Related

  • Angela Davis Abolition Democracy Analysis

    596 Words  | 3 Pages

    Angela Davis’ book Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture provides her critique on how today’s democracy is continually weakened by structures of oppression, such as slavery, reconstruction, and lynching. By utilizing her own experience and employing views from historical figures like Frederick Douglass and W.E.B. Dubois, Davis examines the chain of racism, sexism, and political oppression. She speaks of the hidden moral and ethical issues that bring difference within people’s social situations. In the “Abolition Democracy” chapter, she describes the relationship between the production of law and violation of law demonstrated in the United States.

    Read More

  • Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary

    1090 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant does not presume to establish moral laws; he posits the basis for moral law itself. Through this process, Kant introduces the opposing concepts of heteronomy, laws provided externally for the individual, and autonomy, laws established via the application of reason. The implication arises that autonomy under Kant's definition is freedom, and that autonomy is a requisite for moral actions. To fully develop an understanding of this relationship it is crucial to deconstruct and integrate his notions of: will, duty, maxim, and imperative. Humans have the unique ability to perceive natural law, and imagine or will those forces to be different.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Groundwork For The Metaphysic Of Moral

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant believes it is everyone’s duty to do good in life, meaning one should do the right thing(8b). “I will connect Kant’s definition of duty to the guiding question “How do we form conclusions about what is right and wrong, good and

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hume And Utilitarianism

    1612 Words  | 7 Pages

    In this paper I will discuss Hume 's notion of morality and compare his understanding of morality with Mill 's utilitarianism and Kant 's deontology ethics. I will dwell into the moral pillars of the Humean ethics and confer his moral principles in sentiments. furthermore, I will talk about Mill 's utilitarian ethics and contrast his notion of happiness with the role of sentiments in Hume 's understanding. on the other hand, I will contrast these two notions of morality with Kant 's deontological principle. Finally, I will contrast the role of reason in Kant 's ethics with the role of sentiments in Humean ethics.

    Read More

  • Kant's Immanuel: Grounding Of Metaphysics Of Mo

    658 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the idea of a categorical imperative for a duty, it follows the though of it being pure. Being a pure thought and taken from experiences we can get morally actions as they are truly intuitive. Such as helping one another is moral and priori. Although we can be taught to help others, all are born with the thought of helping each other. It follows the rules of nature, as humans are social creature.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Kant's Explanation Of Moral Law

    1138 Words  | 5 Pages

    Essay: In his work, Kant argues that there is a supreme moral principal, which he calls categorical imperative which dictates us to act according to moral laws that we give to ourselves. In order to establish this, he comes with three sub arguments that constitute to the main argument. First, he establishes that the principle of a good will is to do only those actions whose maxims can be conceived as having the form of a law. Good actions are those governed by good will, and we assign moral worth to these actions only.

    Read More

  • Kant Doctrine Of Right Summary

    10714 Words  | 43 Pages

    Topic:- The Critical Study of Kant’s Doctrine of Right. Introduction: What is Right? A right is the sovereignty to act without the permission of others.

    Read More

  • Blaise Pascal Vs Kant Essay

    1099 Words  | 5 Pages

    Reason is satisfactory in reaching conclusions because reason can identify universal truths. As Kant displays, reason can be used to create an entire system of morality. In order to determine if an action is moral,

    Read More

  • Non-Formal Values Controversy In Kant's Moral Philosophy

    407 Words  | 2 Pages

    How do moral decisions differ from other kinds of decision? In general, how does a moral x differ from a non-moral x, whatever x may be? In this article, I examine an exegetical controversy regarding Kant 's theory of Morality which centers on this well-known topic. My enquiry will provide a fresh point of moral decision for the nature of the moral value.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Philosophy Of Virtue Ethics

    1270 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant argues that the general concept of morality is divided into two rules of reason. The first rule of reason for morality is the hypothetical imperative. These imperatives include characteristics such as customs, fashion, happiness, prudence, taste, art, i.e. As Kant reasons in his work, “The hypothetical imperative that represents practical necessity of the action as a means to furthering happiness is assertotic. One may expound it as necessary not merely to an uncertain, merely possible aim, but to an aim, that one can presuppose safely and a priori with every human being, because it belongs to his essence.

    Read More

  • Theories Of Utilitarianism, Kantianism, And Aristotelianism

    1163 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1222 Words  | 5 Pages

    I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

    Read More

  • John Hume And Kant's Theory Of Morality

    1328 Words  | 6 Pages

    The specification of morality is abstracted from nature in that individuals face various kinds of laws in making moral choices. While moral law is not empirical or causal other than as a prior normative notion, humans as subjects under the law experience rationality and a phenomenal effect at the same time. In the phenomenal world, the scientific determination is actual but comparatively, it is morally possible when rational beings make a normative

    Read More

  • Kant Moral Obligation

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    Subjects feel the un-analyzable good as many kinds of concepts we directly follow with. Given its peculiar sensation and subjective characteristics, the concept of the good becomes absolutely indemonstrable. Moral obligation, in this way, is to be closely associated with this subjective privacy. At the end of this essay, Kant concludes that we acquire ‘many’ such simple feelings of the good in practice, the good is indeed ‘the foundation for all the other practical principles’. Even though he addresses that the fundamental principle of obligation still needed to be ‘determined more reliably’,this essay nevertheless indicates that Kant’s early views come to the perspective that the obligation or necessary end primarily driven by a kind of subjective, simple, and indemonstrable

    Read More

  • Basic Principle Deontological Analysis

    929 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

    Read More

More about Categorical Imperative Essay

Open Document