Explain the causes of current social injustice and inequalities in rural Southern Africa and draw from case studies used in lectures
There has been a number of questions posed to the issue of land in Southern African countries as a result this has played a crucial role in the history of these countries (Zimbabwe and South Africa) since the successful resolution is critically significant not only for stability but also for development and democracy (Kranz, 2001). The historical settings provide a critical framework for understanding the current inequalities and injustices that are observed in the modern society. The rural divide which took place during the colonial government shaped the way society interacted with the natural resources. Imperialism divided rural areas into white-controlled large-scale commercial farms; as well as state protected areas for conservation and other use (Kranz, 2001). Therefore, in the current democratic South Africa the desire to have the land restored to its rightful owners has been the main objective for many Africans as land which was used by the indigenous rural households to survive was demoralized during the colonial and later the apartheid government. This is a critical analysis essay which will discuss the causes of the current social injustice and inequalities in rural Southern Africa specifically, in the context of South Africa using the theories of conservation and dispossession. Following this discussion this paper will draw on the
In Mark Mathabane’s autobiography, Kaffir Boy, the black civilians of South Africa are kept caged by the oppressive, racist government by means of unfair laws, lack of opportunity, segregation, and absurd bureaucratic procedures. In chapter 3 of Kaffir Boy the poll-tax and tribal-tax are introduced
There has been many reform movements to set a stepping stone for the poor, and throughout the years these movements has improved the qualities of the poor. For instance health care, Humanitarian Acts were introduced to aid the poor. Also as (Document F) states “To substitute a system of brotherly cooperation for one of selfish competition; to secure to our children… to guarantee to each other forever the means of physical support.” This shows that the people, such as the ones who were in the Brook Farm association, understood the hardship of a poor life, and wanted to sustain the poor by giving them opportunity to live a life they desire.
This article acts as a continuation of the research done by the author while conducting fieldwork in South Africa pertaining to the ways that water privatization has affected poor, South African women. The piece examines the transition from the apartheid regime to the election of the African National Congress (ANC) in 1994. Women and girls living in poverty are intimately linked to water, as the article notes, and this relationship is explored as the author considers the ways in which privatization has impacted their lives physically, mentally, and emotionally. The article allows the reader to examine the role that international institutions, such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization, played in South
Poverty is “...the most savage of all human afflictions” (1). It “...[spreads] like a cancer” through generations that become ever more powerless to “...mobilize their efforts against it” (1). Nowhere is this more clear than in Gordon Parks’ essay, “Flavio’s Home”. Parks vividly retells the story of a young boy, Flavio de Silva, and his family as they struggle to survive on grossly less than the bare minimum in the slums of Rio.
Rather than reducing social and economic inequality, China’s rapid economic growth magnifies the gap of benefits received by people in different socio-economic groups. As we will see, social and economic inequality are two sides of the same coin and is not solely the product of economic development. In addition to pure market forces, state policies play a significant role in contributing to the high levels of inequality China experiences nowadays. Despite the government’s concern towards inequality, recent interventions are not sufficiently targeted at the main causes of this issue which result in the continuing climb of China’s inequality figure. Nevertheless, contrary to conventional wisdom, the threat of inequality to China’s social and
After South Africa gained independence as a country from Britain, it was a new beginning for the nation. However, elements of British influence continued to exist — the social discrimination and the preservation of the white superior social hierarchy system, for example — influencing the development of South Africa. It took many resistance movements, brutal protests and courageous individuals to instill equality within South African society after their independence. The negative effects of British imperialism on South Africa still resonate among South Africans and British today, many of whom may have a personal connection to the unjust laws, oppression and
Disparities in the world come amidst First World and Third World problems as they are juxtaposed. How can the rich Wall Street guy readily identify with a homeless person, and, not so much by way of material affluence, but by way of a sense of belonging in the world? How can even I, a working-to-middle-class male caucasian, even relate with that sense of overall abandonment? Much more valuable than material affluence is a sense of place, a fit in the world, and an identity that is real and pungent with purpose and meaning. Belonging provides these.
“For to be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others”-Nelson Mandela (Newsone.com). Apartheid the state of being apart. A system of racial segregation in South Africa enforced through legislation by the National Party from 1948 to 1994. Robben Island just off the coast of Cape Town the Alcatraz of South Africa. The Inmates of Robben Island were political prisoners like Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Pan Africanist Congress founder Robert Sobukwe and others fighting apartheid in their homeland.
Introduction This essay will be based on the usage of sociological theories of stratification to discuss the extent to which contemporary South African society mirrors any one of the theories. Stratification is a system or formation of layers, classes or categories. Social stratification is described as the way which different groups of people as placed within society. In modern society, stratification is usually determined by income and other forms of wealth but no matter what may determine it, the society’s stratification has significant consequences to its members. The top theories that will be discussed in the essay are structural functionalism, social conflict and symbolic interaction.
Introduction Apartheid was an official barrier which separated the different races in South Africa, namely the black South Africans and the white Afrikaans South Africans. Although Apartheid ended 20 years ago when Nelson Mandela was elected president, Apartheid still plays a large role in South African History. Apartheid began long before it was officially named Apartheid in 1948 by the leading political party, National Party. The separation between the black and white people of South Africa began around the time Jan Van Riebeek arrived in the Cape in 1652. Since then the segregation escalated due to events which caused hatred between the two races.
Maya Verdier Global Studies 2H Mr. Grace Set: 1 South African Apartheid Apartheid was the policy of segregation, political, and economic discrimination against non-European groups in South Africa. Apartheid was introduced in 1948 and created a tremendous turning point in South African history. South Africa was colonized by the English and Dutch in the 17th century. The English and Dutch later became called Afrikaners, and these two groups had a power-share over Africa until the 1940’s. When the Afrikaner National Party gained a strong majority Apartheid was invented.
Colonialism and apartheid are no more, however South Africa still kneels at its exploitative feet thus many in the population remain marginalized, because of their race. Race was used to identify those who stood to benefit from the systems who were predominantly whites. Thus the making of whites stems from an exploitative past of dispossession and subjugation. Today whiteness or rather white people remain beneficiaries of the colonial and apartheid past occupying key positions of power. However not all whites are equal, there are those who are more privileged than others whites, but it does not mean that their whiteness does not put them at an advantage than other races.
NAME: THENJIWE MNGADI 212518955 POLS 716 ANDREW OKEM XENOPHOBIA IN SOUTH AFRICA Xenophobia refers to the inexplicable anger and hatred for strangers or foreigners. Xenophobia is one of the issues that persist in the South African state. One of the most regularly mentioned reasons for the occurrences of xenophobia in South Africa is Apartheid.
INTRODUCTION Economic inequalities can be shown by individuals’ different positions within the economic circulation. People’s economic positions are related also to other characteristics, like whether they have or not a disability, their ethnic background, or if they are a man or a woman. TYPES OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY: There are three types of economic inequality, income inequality, pay inequality and wealth inequality. Income inequality: Income inequality is the extent to which income is circulated unevenly in a group of individuals. By income is not just the money received through payments, but all the money got from employment, investments, such as interest on savings accounts and profits from shares of stock, savings, state benefits,
The thesis of domestic poverty There are some authors like Rawls, that argue that poverty is mainly due to the nature of political culture, religious beliefs and philosophical traditions of corrupt national elites and the moral responsibility of the rich countries in this regard would be a duty of assistance (Pogge:2010) The author nonetheless puts this thesis in a historical context and criticizes Rawls position mainly stating that the current better off situation that some regions experience is based on inherited slavery and colonialism that created an economic and social inequality. And explains that Africa will need 2 centuries to catch up the per capita income that most European countries experience. But it is important as well to