Non violence protest has been practiced by multiple people all over the world, and it has shown to be successful. Specifically Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with his form of non violence within the Civil Rights Movement. He is a legend, he has influenced many people to follow his tactics, in order to make the world a better place and to progress the country. Cesar Chavez is a Civil Rights Leader himself and writes an article on DR. King’s 10 year anniversary of his untimely death and his article was on how non violence protests are better than any form of violence by using elements of pathos and ethos.
Chavez uses elements of pathos right in the first paragraph when talking about Dr. King. He explains how his teachings are an influence to not
…show more content…
Chavez informs people about how violence comes at a price , and that there are plenty of shortcomings in violence than nonviolence. Chavez says “when victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached.” and the in lines 60-69 he explains how violence only leads to more problems and saying bluntly that people will die can tug some heart strings. When Chavez contrasts non violence he uses “the American people.” to bring the audience who are american closer to what he is saying. Not to mention that he wrote it on the anniversary of Dr. King’s untimely death. His pathos is used in a way so people understand the adversity of protests, and that it is not something that is an overnight sensation. It goes on for months, even years at a time with very little progress, along with the harsh realities like injuries or even fatality. Even with these things in mind the consequences in which Chavez brings up within the article is severe, “People suffer from violence.” Chavez is right, there has not been one vent where violence has solved anything. Both parties suffer the …show more content…
Chavez uses “We” as in a sign of unity and connection throughout the article but also to show his connection to the Civil Rights Movement . In the last paragraph Chavez shows his connection to the labor union and that no matter how long it takes they’ll prevail just like Dr. King and Ghandi with which Chavez used as an example. Chavez’s use of allusions in order to show an example of the role models that he looks up to and people who have made such a wide impact on society that people all over the world know who Ghandi and Dr. King are. Furthermore, Chavez himself is a Civil Rights Leader and a labor union organizer so, people understand why he would be talking about very important people who have changed so many
Acclaimed activist and political leader, Cesar Chavez, in his article, attempts to convince the laboring class and those in need in America to restrain from any use of violence during their struggle. Throughout his article Chavez is able to maintain a predominantly straightforward positive tone in order to motivate his audience to lean more towards a non-violent approach to their problems. His purpose is to persuade the laboring class in America to abstain from any use of violence during their struggle. Chavez further elaborates his desire and purpose for his followers by utilizing the use of pathos and logos. Chavez is in the mentality that nonviolence is the only way his followers- the rest of the labor union- will achieve their goals and abstain from any injuries or harm that could possibly happen to them.
Violence is characterized by the diversion among a group of people and by using Gandhi's teaching, Chavez revealed that unity is the key to overcoming these differences. Overall, history was examined because “...who gets killed in the case of violent revolution… the poor, the workers…” (78-82). Chavez foresees the future by recalling the irony of power that mislead the poor. History is full of loss, but to achieve peace, society must follow the examples of the reformers and learn from their success, as well as their
Appeal to history is used as an argument that use past cases as a guide to the future. It is used by the author in the article when he looks back at nonviolent protests in the past and how successful they can be over violence. One example being Gandhi’s marches in which he taught that “[t]he boycott…is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause” (Chavez 61-64). Chavez also states that if victory were attained through violence, it “…would come at the expense of injury or perhaps death” and it will only be temporary as it will just “… [replace] one violent form of power with just another just as violent” (Chavez 67-68, 75-77). The author makes it clear that history has proven the nonviolent protests holds more leverage as the oppression it is against, whereas violence can only lead to injuries and deaths of many and only result in a similar or worse
This is best exemplified by Chavez when he elaborates on violent tendencies since, “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers” (Chavez). From Chavez’s statement about violence approaches to solve problems it impacts the audience from the beginning as it makes them question and reconsider what actually gets accomplished by resorting to violent tactics. This also in return, develops the beginning of Chavez’s main argument as it abhors the use of violence to solve ethical/moral problems and shows that temporary solutions are the only thing to come from such
In 1978, the 10th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader and leader of the National Farm Workers Association, wrote an article advocating for the acts of nonviolence. In his support for nonviolence, he made many rhetorical choices to assist his argument. He cites other leaders who found worth in nonviolence, uses pathos, personifies nonviolence, and employs an anaphora, but his overall lack of flowery language gets his argument across much clearer. Chavez opens his article by speaking of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, who this work was originally commemorating. Another civil rights leader, especially in the fight for equal rights for African Americans within the US, “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”
He uses logos in the form of looking at past history and analyzing the downfalls of violent resistance, to emphasize how violence has many strings attached to it, whereas the more peaceful nonviolent route allows for greater freedom and less risk to the general population. Heavy diction is used to create a separation between violence and nonviolence, shining a bright light onto violence as a negative way to deal with problems, while lifting nonviolence as a means of powerful hand to win any “competition”. It was important for Chavez to remind his audience that nonviolence is the method of choice when fighting for change as it was the 10th anniversary of MLK’s death, an important leader in the civil rights movement who used the power of nonviolence as a method to induce change for the black community. At the time of Chavez’s writing, many farmers were upset over a crash in the agriculture market, with many farmers left with little to no money and no help from the government. Chavez wanted to inform these people of the importance of nonviolence as a way to get their ideas through, as violence would resolve nothing and lead to greater disruptions which would affect the entirety of the American population.
The author speaks to your brain's logic. Showing how there is no benefit to violence. In paragraph 11, Chavez uses ethos to convey his message of nonviolence.
To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.
(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct
In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.
Chavez begins his argument by saying that a human life is an irreplaceable “possession given by God”. By resorting to violence, it has the grim possibility of being taken away. Chavez further expands his use of ethos by providing examples of ethics and morals. Nonviolence gathers support for moral causes, whereas unethical actions create discouragement among followers. Violence is merely the result
Chavez asserts repeatedly that nonviolence is the only way for change to happen. The repeated use of “we”, “us” and “our” conveys the message to the audience that he is one of them. Chavez can relate to the farm workers based on his credibility (ethos) because of his past. Chavez went to work on the farm fields at a young age and knew exactly how the frustrated workers felt.
The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of
In order to achieve true freedom one must discover that you can break unjust laws through peaceful protest. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and “The Speech at The March Washington” by Josephine Baker each article passionately argues about the disadvantages of the black community, the equality and power of education. We must learn to act with patients and not guns we must protect are self’s with a pen and paper not violence. Dr. King once4 said “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is unique in history which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.
The NFWA striked inspiration to those around due to the peaceful protests, which were inspired by Chávez’s heroes, Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Cesar did not accept any acts of violence from his followers or others in general, quickly denying even the idea of it. The NFWA showed their strength and determination by fasting, boycotting, and most of all persevering to not only prove their point, but to show that violence is never the answer. Cesar Chávez identified the problem, gaining followers from it and support from allies in other unions and communities.