Cesar Chavez, a prominent labor union organizer and civil rights leader, passionately persuades the laboring class in his article published in a religious magazine that nonviolence is the best course of action. Printed on the tenth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s death, Chavez proposes that acting nonviolently to get better working conditions, better treatment, better pay, better rights, and higher respect is more effective than acting in a violent manner. Chavez integrates personification by expressing how the laboring class’s struggles has “grown and matured.” By humanizing an idea such as “struggle”, Chavez aids the reader into feeling a sense of connection to the struggle even though they are not directly involved in it. …show more content…
Readers then begin to feel sympathy for these laborers who value a person’s life and do not intend to harm others to gain rights. Consequently, this guides the audience to support the workers and help them improve their conditions. Furthermore, Chavez incorporates an anaphora into his writing by repeating “we” in paragraph five. The repetition conveys a sense of emphasis about how the laborers act in nonviolent ways. By identifying the laboring class as peaceful, the writer gains the assistance of the readers. This further encourages the laborers that being nonviolent works and thus fuels their revolution. Continuing on, Chavez reminds the readers that the laborers experience “feelings of frustration” during their struggle for better rights. Drawing the attention of the readers to the line, the aliteration emphasizes the laborer’s feelings. Readers now gain insight on how the laborers feel and wish to support them. This enables the laborer to keep searching for better conditions. Moreover, the way “Gandhi taught the boycott” is “most nearly perfect” in Chavez’s eyes. Including a renowned figure like Gandhi highlights the strength of nonviolent actions and demonstrates to the audience that peaceful
Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Analysis Throughout the existence of mankind, many cultures and civilizations have encountered a form of injustice treatment that has resulted in political movements. Some were supported by violence, such as the Revolutionary War, which was an ultimate result of Great Britain’s lack of freedom of religion, while others, such as the women’s suffrage movement, were based solely on nonviolence. In one of his magazine articles, Cesar Chavez explores Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s idea that nonviolent resistance is the most powerful when fighting injustice as well as why and how this is possible.
Chavez’s great sacrifices strengthened the movement and gave so much more that what any one man could have imagined. Chavez continued with protests and boycotts throughout the rest of the 60’s and continued well into the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s. While drawing influence from Gandhi, Cesar knew that non-violence would gain the most support from the general public, which it did, and strongly encouraged that the movement should stay that
Acclaimed activist and political leader, Cesar Chavez, in his article, attempts to convince the laboring class and those in need in America to restrain from any use of violence during their struggle. Throughout his article Chavez is able to maintain a predominantly straightforward positive tone in order to motivate his audience to lean more towards a non-violent approach to their problems. His purpose is to persuade the laboring class in America to abstain from any use of violence during their struggle. Chavez further elaborates his desire and purpose for his followers by utilizing the use of pathos and logos. Chavez is in the mentality that nonviolence is the only way his followers- the rest of the labor union- will achieve their goals and abstain from any injuries or harm that could possibly happen to them.
Section 1: Identification and evaluation of sources For my investigation, I chose the topic of civil rights activist, Cesar Chavez. The question of this investigation is: “To what extent did Cesar Chavez use nonviolent social action to improve the lives of farm workers and people of color throughout the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s?” Throughout the 1950s and 60s, farm workers had a harsh life. From harsh working condition, to low wages, this created a huge conflict in the whole country of the United States.
What literary devices did Chavez really use for his argument about nonviolence resistance? Although Chavez uses a variety of literary terms, he uses Logos, the appeal to logic and senses, and aphorism, which is a belief that expresses a truth or principle of life. Chavez uses Logos to bring his point that violent protests not only take away or injure innocent people, but actually may end up hurting your cause in general as it can lower “morale” in those who do support your cause. It can also make those who wish to support your cause not to due to your idea’s violent reactions to your opposition and what they stand for. “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many
This also establishes the overarching argument Chavez is trying to make, that nonviolent approaches allow for much better long-term results with less damage done to all parties involved in such
Even ten years after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his anti-racist actions, the battle against discrimination continued. As a civil rights activist, Cesar Chavez fights for workers’ rights. In his article, Cesar Chavez employs a convincing tone, contrasts, and allusions to convince his readers that nonviolent protest is the right way to create change in a community. Using this logos he has created, Chavez uses a convincing tone to sway his readers into agreeing with him. By stating that “nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect,” Chavez leaves no room for any argument with his strong word choice.
A decade later after Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination, Cesar Chavez published an article to help those people fight for civil rights and those in need of help. This disaster affected many people’s heart that were fighting during the Civil Rights Movement and those that were also helping the people in need of help. Chavez uses emotional appeal,diction,and repetition supports his article in helping those involved in civil rights. Chavez appeals to pathos to express the torment that the lower class is dealing with like the farmers and the workers that do not earn much money. He describes that violence is making the large percentage of people feeling “ frustration,impatience,and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.”
The article, by Cesar Chavez, was written about violence and the many ways to solve issues. It shows readers a more peaceful perspective on life as opposed to violence. Chavez, a civil rights leader, writes this article to compare nonviolence to violence, and how nonviolence is the most effective way to promote change. To remind us what people, as a group, are capable of, Chavez emphasizes the value of nonviolence. Chavez repeats the word ‘nonviolence’ frequently to show how nonviolence is the best solution to any problem.
In 1978, the 10th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader and leader of the National Farm Workers Association, wrote an article advocating for the acts of nonviolence. In his support for nonviolence, he made many rhetorical choices to assist his argument. He cites other leaders who found worth in nonviolence, uses pathos, personifies nonviolence, and employs an anaphora, but his overall lack of flowery language gets his argument across much clearer. Chavez opens his article by speaking of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, who this work was originally commemorating. Another civil rights leader, especially in the fight for equal rights for African Americans within the US, “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”
Cesar Chavez published an article on the tenth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s death about why nonviolent resistance is more successful than violence. He demonstrates the importance of nonviolence, why people choose to support it, and how different nonviolence activists, like Dr. King and Gandhi, were successful in using this tactic. Chavez also talks about the problems with utilizing violence as a form of resistance. Cesar Chavez wrote about important leaders that used nonviolence as a form of resistance and what tactics made them powerful and influential.
“¡Si se puede!” This was the rallying cry of the most influential farm laborers union of the late 20th century. A motto that inflicted hope and confidence in the tired farm workers in California and Arizona. This quote described Cesar Chavez’ life, from his childhood to death. Chavez was an important figure in American History because he improved the lives of farm workers, the reason we have food on our table.
Affirmed by the anaphora of repeated communal diction, there is no mistaking that his point is applicable to all. The “we”s and “our”s do more than just label his audience though; Chavez utilizes these two powerful words to assert his role within the movement, not as a leader or just an ally, but as one of the common people affected. For Chavez, the problems are personal; the farm workers’ movement and the fight for civil rights is much more than a cause he believes in: it is a struggle for justice that he has devoted his entire life to. Within his article, Chavez’s passion, developed over years of experience with hardship and resistance, comes through with charged statements such as “If we fail, there are those who will see violence as the shortcut to change”. By inserting himself into the narrative of change as one small piece and utilizing his past experience to ardently support his cause, Chavez successfully emphasizes how by working together within, the community can achieve the common goal of non-violent resistance and change for the poor
Inspire “The end of all knowledge should be service to others”, says Cesar Chavez (brainyquote.com). Though some activists’ live lives of undoubted suffering, or at least sacrifice, their work makes a difference and inspires many to follow; as a result, it creates hope for those facing similar problems. Boyan Slat, Hadi Partovi, and Cesar Chavez are examples of this characteristic, and, because of their actions, others stand with them, protest with them; sometimes even overturning unjust laws, allowing an ideal society to be created in the eyes of all citizens.
Throughout the essay, Chavez kept using words and phrases like “we are convinced,” or the word “nonviolence” to keep his opinion about nonviolence more clear and straightforward. He is trying to get the point across that you have more opportunity with nonviolence than if you take the violent path. Another way Chavez uses rhetorical strategies is though pathos.