Q2
Challenges Addressed at the Constitutional Convention
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 sought to address several pressing challenges facing the newly formed United States, including the weakness of the central government and the conflicts over representation in the legislature. The Constitution, as ratified in 1788 and amended through the Bill of Rights in 1791, addressed many of these issues, though some would persist and evolve during the early decades of the nation's history. Two major challenges addressed at the Convention included the balance of power between the central government and the states, and the nature of representation in the legislature. It can be argued that while the Constitution made significant strides in addressing
…show more content…
The Articles of Confederation had left the central government weak and ineffectual, prompting the call for the Constitutional Convention . As James Madison argued in Federalist No. 10, "The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice.” To address this issue, the Constitution established a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, ensuring that no single branch would dominate . The separation of powers across the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, along with checks and balances, made it difficult for any one branch to dominate the others. The Constitution further divided power in the legislature through bicameralism in Congress. These measures helped achieve stability in the early republic. This new framework provided the central government with the necessary authority to make decisions for the nation, while the Tenth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, reserved powers not delegated to the United States to the states . This balance of power between federal and state authority was crucial in gaining ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns about …show more content…
However, the ongoing debate over the balance of power between the federal government and the states, as well as the slavery issue, demonstrated that the Constitution was not a perfect solution to all of the nation's concerns. The debate over the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States and the Nullification Crisis of the 1830s are examples of the tensions between federal and state powers that would continue to shape the nation's political landscape . While the Constitution achieved a balance of power for a time, events such as these would show it was imperfect and subject to
The Constitution DBQ The Constitution of United States is regarded by many as an important document, for it gave the common people the power to form a government the way they want. Yet, despite all the benefits that it brought to the American people at the time, people also had some concerns about the Constitution such as: it is creating a Central government that is too powerful, only white men that owns property are allowed to vote, not everyone in the nation are treated equally, etc. When the Constitution was first being drafted, Representatives from each state hoped to add terms that would benefit their own states—this lead to a heated debate on how the Constitution should be formed.
The framers of the United States Constitution intentionally built points of conflict and tension into the constitutional system for several reasons. First, the framers established a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government—the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This division of powers creates a dynamic where each branch has the ability to limit or counteract the actions of the other branches. This intentional separation of powers leads to inevitable conflicts and tensions as each branch seeks to assert its authority and protect its interests. Next the framers created a federal system of government, where power is divided between the national government and state governments, also known as federalism.
Imran Hossain Christi Daylay Govt 2305 20 Sept. 2017 Various Compromise at the Constitutional Convention The Constitution Convention met and wrote the compromises, which balanced power between the federal government and state governments in 1787. Some issues were emerging at the constitution convention such as the large and small states.
This let those who opposite a strong of the nation government, the antifederalist to push for a Bill of rights. A key part of the Bill of rights was the ninth and tenth Amendment 4 that left powers not given to the united governments government to the people and the states (medical man
The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who
In the late 1770s, the Constitution caused much controversy and pitted the Federalists and Anti-Federalists against each other even further (“Brief History”). The Constitution created a stronger central government and weaker state governments which Anti-Federalists were not in favor of. (“Brief History”). The Constitution also included three branches of government: executive, judiciary, and legislative and included checks and balances. The new constitution caused many to speak out in opposition and for it and among those people were James Madison and Mercy Otis Warren.
The constitution's adoption in 1787 was just one of several challenges the young country confronted. Financial instability was once a fresh phenomena due to a federal government that was severely indebted and lacked the actual revenue to pay it off. Additionally, the federal government lacked the power to levy taxes, which suggests that citizens were hesitant to do so, which posed a serious challenge for it. The new Republican leaders lacked political cohesion because of political differences. The federalist party, which supported a powerful central government, was led by Alexander Hamilton.
The motivations and goal of the Constitutional convention of 1787 was to reform the Articles of Confederation to allow a stronger centralized government, and hopefully to solve issues not yet agreed upon within the government. There was a significant lack of representation for smaller states. Shay’s rebellion showcased an economic class disparity. There was also a lack of balance in the powers and a weak national government made for the states to have conflicting rules with each other as well as too much power. Shay’s Rebellion was the main perpetrator of the revision.
Throughout United States history there have been numerous issues, constitutional and civic, that Americans have debated. One of these constitutional issues that Americans debated, is the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists and Anti-federalists debated over the Constitution’s ratification for years. As a result of these debates, efforts by individuals, government, and groups, such as the Federalist Party, and James Madison, were made to address this issue. These efforts were very successful.
Federally issued paper currency was rendered worthless as there was no way to regulate interstate commerce and the law-making process was nearly impossible seeing as it required two-thirds of state votes. All of the aforementioned nonsense called for a particularly bitter nation, and this lack of fondness towards the government led to an equally problematic and especially violent country, most notably in Shays ' Rebellion of 1776. Enter the supreme law of the land, otherwise known as the United States Constitution. In 1788, this document officially replaced the Articles of Confederation, and is still currently the basis for all American law. Its goal was to make the nation more republic-like, while also maintaining peaceful relations between states.
“Although Americans are accustomed to thinking about the Constitution as a miraculously well-constructed and farsighted document, its writing was the result of significant conflict and compromise” (Castner, The Constitutional Debates). The Constitutional Convention was a meeting of state delegates in 1787 to revise and edit the Articles of Confederation. The original Articles of Confederation caused politicians to meet and revise the government. The process the delegates went through included debates on slavery, legislature, and state representation. The effect of the convention is obvious: a strong republic that stood the test of time and still governs the US justly and fairly.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 also solved major two internal conflicts within the nation. One was between Federal Government and State Government while the other was among the branches within the federal government. Because the Framers feared the national authority would grow too powerful, they designed it to be divided into three branches, which check and balance the power of each other. The establishment of the Supreme Court was a protection of the minority while two other branches utilized power from the majority population. Therefore, this could reduce the growth in power of the federal government, keeping the state government safe.
These authorities that the national government should have, were all up to the states to decide under the Articles. With the taking away some of the states rights in the Constitution, Anti-federalists feared that this would leave the states too weak, resulting in more problems. Under the new Constitution, many powers that were now in the government 's hands are: the power to levy and collect taxes, the power to regulate interstate commerce, the government set up a national court system consisting of district, circuit, and a supreme court, the government could enforce laws, there was now a house based on population, and a senate based on equal representation (two votes per state), to amend the Constitution, a ⅔ vote of Congress was needed, and a ¾ vote of the states were needed, and a majority rule was needed to pass bills. These new powers and abilities of the national government helped to create a strong, new
“The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands, whether one, a few, or many… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny. ”-James Madison. Fifty-five delegates, from the thirteen states, met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 to discuss and revise the Articles of Confederation. The chief executive and the representatives worked to create a frame for what is now our Constitution. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in four ways; Federalism that creates a State and Federal government, Separation of Powers that gives equal power to the three branches, Checks and Balances that create balance in the three branches by checking each other and being checked and the Small States vs the Big States ensures an equal voice for all states no matter what their size.