The Roman Republic was a representative democracy that evolved to address the changing nature of Roman society. It was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the last Roman king, and it lasted for over 400 years. During that time, the Roman Republic expanded its territory, its population, and its power. It also faced several challenges, including civil wars, foreign invasions, and economic crises. Despite Rome’s founding on the principles of a republic, it struggled to fairly represent all its citizens.
The Roman Republic emerged in 509 BCE following the overthrow of the Roman monarchy. As Gibbons and Livy in History of Rome both say, Rome got too big and too wealthy too fast, with the emperors being lax with their power and control
…show more content…
Initially, this system was exclusive, with political power retained by a few wealthy residents known as patricians. The working class, also known as plebs, had no voting power or right to run for office, creating significant tensions. Plebeians started pushing for more participation in government, which resulted in the creation of numerous offices and assemblies that allowed them to participate in decision-making. Despite Livy emphasizing the inclusion of the plebs in the republic, he also points out that wealthy people continued to have a large advantage in this political system, while the plebs were essentially ignored in decision-making. However, others were more comfortable with tensions that come from a democratic style of government. Machiavelli argues the opposite, saying that protest and successions are a natural part of a republic. Both authors highlight the competing priorities that the different classes brought to the table. Ultimately, even though Rome was on the path of something better by letting more people partake in the government, it still left people …show more content…
Women and freed slaves were unable to vote, which was around fifty percent of the population. Of the remaining potential voters, historians guess that two to twenty-five percent participated in the election process, according to Alan Ward, in his book, How Democratic Was the Roman Republic? If people wanted to vote for government officials, they would have to come to Rome and cast a vote there, leaving out at least seventy-five percent of the population based on how big the roman empire was at the time. Another potential flaw with the roman republic is with the actual history written down about it. Mary Beard talks about this in her book, A History of Ancient Rome, saying that Livy wrote his historical accounts 400 years after the events took place, causing us to question how reliable writers at the time were. Many people were left out of the roman republic, leaving a small number of people able to partake in elections and decisions that affected
The Roman Empire started in 27 BC and lasted until its fall in AD 476. Many things were wrong in the end, causing the fall. Rome had always had good and bad rulers. If a bad one was in power, then a good one would come and fix everything. It was like clock work throughout the Roman history.
The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.
In 509 B.C.E. the Romans had taken back their own rule that the Etruscans had maintained for Decades(RR). A republic was formed after the Romans were in control again that gave the people a say in how the state was run(RR). Many countries had copied this form of government including the United States(RR). The Romans also had the three branches of government. The executive legislative, and judicial branch.
At this time it didn't matter about the division in society, “Even the poorest of Roman citizens, the proletarii, were still represented.” They used to not look down on the poor, but they used them to become a stronger and more productive community. Although they were fairly democratic in the beginning, whenever they expanded, it slowly began to change. “Once Roman territory had expanded…it was mostly the well-to-do rural voter and their clients who could afford the time and expense to come to Rome.” (Document C)
INTRODUCTION: According to (National Geographic Society, 2022). As the final Etruscan king of Rome was deposed, the Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE. With two representatives chosen by legislative assemblies to preside over the Roman Senate and lead the Roman military, the Roman government functioned as a representative democracy in the form of a republic. Nevertheless, the Roman Republic never aspired to be a direct democracy; instead, it had a fused government that combined elements of "kingship," "aristocracy," and democracy.
Rome started as a republic and ended as a dictatorship. The empires in Rome were the world's greatest empire. These empires started around 750 BCE. Around 200 BCE the Greek empire was weakening and Rome was getting stronger.
The Roman Empire and Roman Republic were two distinct periods in the history of ancient Rome. The Roman Republic was established in 509 BC, following the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. It lasted until 27 BC when the Roman Empire was established under the rule of Augustus. One of the main differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was their form of government. The Roman Republic was a system of government where elected officials represented the people.
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC and lasted for nearly 500 years. During this time, Rome became a dominant power in the Mediterranean region, establishing a vast empire that lasted for centuries. However, the Republic itself was beset by internal conflicts, corruption, and a breakdown of the political system that eventually led to its downfall. One of the key factors that contributed to the Republic's decline was the breakdown of the political system. The Roman Republic was initially designed to provide a balance of power among different branches of government, including the Senate, the magistrates, and the people's assemblies.
The Roman Republic was upheld by a republican constitution and, similar to the Athenian government, gave more power to the citizens in the decision making process. The Roman Republic constitution on the other hand also valued the rule of law and implemented checks and balances to prevent one single person or class from taking control of the republic. The republican constitution had a significant impact on the creation, maintenance, and success of the Roman Empire. By implementing the importance of the rule of law, the Roman Republic was able to create the groundwork for a successful republic to ensure that political leaders were going to be held accountable. They created the Senate which established a representative government to debate on
The Roman republic, which officially became a republic in 509 BCE, became one of, if not the most significant states at the time of its inception. Although it began as a small town, it eventually grew to be among the biggest within the Italian peninsula, and with rapid growth, came the need for a new form of government. The Roman republic has many elements that classify it as a democracy, with some similarities to modern say democracies. However, it is important to understand how the republic came to be.
The Roman Republic was a magnificent political system with a lifespan of more than 500 years. Its impact on the modern world cannot be overestimated, as it served as a template for numerous democratic regimes all over the world. Nevertheless, historians cannot dispute the Republic’s eventual collapse, and several possible causes have been put forth. The rise of strong military leaders who overthrew the system of checks and balances that had previously kept the government in check is, in my opinion, the most significant cause that contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The Roman government was established in the early Republic on a complicated system of checks and balances that were meant to prevent any one person or party from acquiring excessive power.
The decline of the Roman Republic can be attributed to a combination of interrelated factors, including rapid imperial expansion, corruption, and social and political divisions. The experience of the Roman Republic throughout history is a cautionary lesson that shows what can happen to any society when faced with massive political and social challenges. The following are some of the factors that may have led to the decline of the Roman Republic and the transfer of power to the rule of the emperors: 1. Imperial expansion:
Circumstances that Led to the Establishment of the Roman Republic According to legend, Rome was founded by twin brothers, Romulus and Remus, who were raised by a she-wolf.
The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.
It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.