III.
In section three, the narrator continues to talk about Emily’s love life and a possible affair she had with a man. The narrator in a rose for Emily talks about Homer Barron “…a Yankee big, dark, ready man, with a big voice and eyes lighter than his face…” (Mays 632). Homer Barron is Emily’s possible spouse. According to the narrator and the town, Homer and Emily were seen together and there were signs of marriage. Because of the descriptive way the narrator expresses, we can infer that the narrator is talking in first person. Opponents of this idea, claim that the narrator is not human or humans. According to the article The Narrator in ‘A Rose for Emily’, “…the narrator is not persons at all but an archaic consciousness…” (Sullivan 166).
…show more content…
The narrator includes himself along with the town when he says “At first nothing happened. Then we were sure that they were to be married” (Mays 633). The narrator along with community members assumed that Homer and Emily were going to marry soon because for months the couple had been together. The narrator in A Rose for Emily also talks about elapsed time since they the last time the community had seen Miss Emily saying, “When we next saw miss Emily, she had grown fat and her hair was turning gray.” (Mays 634). Once again, the narrator gives us evidence that time passed by telling us that “Daily, monthly, yearly, we watch…”, indicating that the narrator is first person plural because the information the narrator knows, is also known by the group of people the narrator hangs out with. Something very interesting is that the narrator shifts from just a community outsider to a respected authority by saying that “each December we sent her a tax notice which would be returned by the post office a week later, unclaimed” (Mays 634). This is a very important clue that helps us find out who the narrator really is. The narrator is present in the three generations and shifts from we to they because the story is not told in chronological order. The narrator is still first person throughout the story. Another opponent to this idea comes from the article In Search of Dead Time: Faulkner’s ‘A Rose for Emily’ that claims that, Emily … comes off as a ghost that haunts still…” (Harris 174). Many critics believe the narrator is not a human and that the narrator is a ghost of Emily telling her life in a different dimension. The author also believes that “the narrative is on one level written as a chronicle of Emily’s life: it opens with the phrase “when miss Emily Grierson died” …” (Harris 172). Although that sounds convincing, this does not explain many scenarios in the story like when the tax
Mr. Grierson, Emily’s father, prohibited her from socializing with men because, in Mr. Grierson’s eyes, there was no man suitable for Emily. After being tired of being alone for so long, Emily decided to date Homer Barron. Homer Barron was a Northerner and worked as a foreman for a construction company. The older folks of the town were excited for Emily, there was even talk about marriage between the couple. However, the younger crowd did not believe Homer was that of Ms. Griersons high status.
Several times it is mentioned that he drove all her suitors away because no one was good enough for her in his mind. This showing of love from Emily's father has proven to be more harmful than it is helpful. After her father's death, Emily somewhat begins to panic. She no longer had that leader or figure of total control and dominance in her life. This leads us to Homer Barron which Emily hopes will fulfill her feeling of isolation.
Paloma Cerda Mrs. Koehler ENGL-1301-566 September 20, 2017 In A Rose for Emily written by William Faulkner, the story of Miss Emily is told through a very loose format. Through this narration, there is a long and drawn out suspense built up through little hints left by the reader without fully giving away the dark truth behind Emily and her house. Until the end of the story, the narrators ambiguity cleverly points the reader towards the climax of the story where Emily is discovered to be Homer Barron’s killer. This ambiguous element is important to the quality of this short story as it drives it forward and keeps the reader interested.
From that point on my doors started to open more, with the two frequently going out together. It was relieving to see Miss Emily finally leaving her room and getting out and around the town, I was hopeful that these two would stay together and that maybe I my respect from the town folk will return and I will once again be considered an iconic house hold of Jefferson. This belief was not long lived, women of the town continued to whisper this time regarding the love affair between Miss Emily and Homer. Due to Miss Emily’s age many wondered if the two would marry and again this became talk of the town, Even the local minister came to speak with Miss Emily, although he left quite swiftly and was never to return. Soon after that visitors from Alabama came to stay, from what I could understand they were relatives of the Griersons, and had come to visit.
Not even a minute ago, they wish Miss Emily to kill herself and now they want to help her by getting the town’s minister and her two cousins to talk to her about Homer and set things right, which shows that there is also a part of town that has sympathy and care for Emily and not just the sardonic and pitiful part (Faulkner 86). Furthermore, the narrator’s embodiment of “we” seems to highlight Miss Emily’s inability to adapt and function as a Southern woman in a rapidly changing world. According to Alice Robertson’s “The Ultimate Voyeur: The Communal Narrator of "A Rose for Emily...," the addition of multiple generations among the townspeople create “a comprehensive milieu depicting shifts in postwar Southern culture” (159). For instance, Miss Emily avoids the law when she refuses to have numbers attached to her house when federal mail service arrived at her residence, which reveals her uneasiness and discomfort towards change. Ultimately, the employment of first person plural presents readers with a wider perspective and a better understanding of Faulkner’s story, also making it more suspenseful and an adventure to
In his short story, “A Rose for Emily,” William Faulkner intends to convey a message to his audience about the unwillingness in human nature to accept change and more specifically the secretive tendencies of aristocrats in the South during the early 20th century. In order to do this, Faulkner sets up a story in which he isolates and old aristocratic woman, Miss Emily, from her fellow townspeople and proceeds to juxtapose her lifestyle with theirs. In doing this he demonstrates her stubborn refusal to change along with the town, but also Among several literary devices the author employs to achieve this contrast, Faulkner sets up his narrator as a seemingly reliable, impartial and knowledgeable member of the community in which Miss Emily lives by using a first person plural, partially omniscient point of view. The narrator is present for all of the scenes that take place in the story, but does not play any role in the events, and speaks for the town as a whole. Faulkner immediately sets up his narrator as a member of the community in the first line of the story, saying that when Miss Emily died “our whole town went to her funeral.”
Analysis of “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner is the best short story because its plot, setting, and symbols are well formulated and incorporated into the story to effectively convey the themes of death and change, race and gender. A Rose for Emily is a short story regarding the life of Emily Grierson as told through the perspectives of the townspeople in a tiny old town in the South. The story begins with the awkward relationship between Emily and her dad, pre and posts his death, and further explores how Emily gets secluded after poisoning her “Yankee” partner Homer Barron and concealing his remains for more than a decade in her bed. William Faulkner exploits various literary devices to create various themes.
If there was a missing person now, the people in the town would have been more suspicious and notified the police. The authorities would have questioned Miss Emily about Homer’s disappearance and searched her house since that is where he was last seen. In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”, it is important to have knowledge of the background history. In order to understand whats happening in the story and why Miss Emily acts the way she does someone must understand why she thinks she is above everyone in the first place.
One of William Faulkner’s best short story of all time is “A Rose for Emily.” The story is a suspense and horror, that will leave readers in shock. Additionally, the story is in chronological order and cleverly broken down into five parts. The first part of the story is the current event that shows Emily’s funeral and the town people mourning. The other four part are pieces of puzzle that shows flash backs of Emily Grierson on how the everyone in town viewed her.
In “The Ghostly Voice of Gossip in Faulkner’s “A Rose For Emily”” author Thomas Klein argues that William Faulkner’s use of an unconventional narrator enhances the story’s complicated timeline and uses examples throughout the text to propose a model as to who the narrator really is. Doing so, Klein focuses in on the reasoning to Faulkner’s claim of “A Rose For Emily” was written as a ghost story. Klein focuses on how the narrator does not claim what gender he or she is. He states that the narrator keeps the main tone of the entire text as either “we” or “our”, never identifying who they are. He expresses that the narrator never declares from what generation he
A Rose For Emily uses more big voice than little voice. The story only goes over certain events in her life without describing how she feels or what she is
I. To begin with, we will analyze section one and learn some background information. In the A Rose for Emily, the narrator is recalling Emily’s funeral by saying “…when Miss Emily Grierson died our whole town went to the funeral…” (Mays 629). The narrator talks about Emily’s house before when she was alive.
This is not the only meaning behind the rose due to different interpretations. The rose may represent Emily, just like the rose she was once beautiful and envied but also just like a rose she grew to be old and began to slowly die. In the scholar journal, "Who Arose for Emily?", written by Timothy O’Brien states the rose represents Emily and love. it once flourished just as Emily did before her father's death but just like the rose withering away she also did but mentally and emotionally. Also, just like the rose she died and was
Following Emily’s death, the townspeople examine the inside of her house, noting the “valance curtains of faded rose color” and the “rose-shaded lights” that adorn the bridal room (Faulkner 37). In most works of literature, roses symbolize love and deep affection, the very qualities absent from Emily’s life. Growing up, Emily was young and beautiful, but her father’s looming presence discouraged any potential suitors. She eventually fell in love with the Northern foreman, Homer Barron, but soon lost him to death. In all, Emily’s life was characterized by unsuccessful attempts at love, explaining why Faulkner felt the need to pay his sympathy toward her.
Kierrah Edwards ENGL 201 9/20/15 Character Analysis: Emily Grierson The short story “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner depicts how seclusion can certainly impact one’s life. Throughout the story, Emily gives off this “insane” impression. However, after fully reading the story, the reader can fully understand why Emily was the way she was. Emily Grierson was a very dependent person.