Year after year souls are lost in the perilous remote mountains of Alaska attempting to relive the delusional odyssey of Christopher Johnson McCandless. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a book about McCandless, also known by his pseudonym Alex Supertramp, a courageous but stubbornly arrogant and naïve adventurer who ventured into the Alaskan bush overestimating himself and underestimating the country. Wayne Westerberg admires McCandless for being an extraordinary hard working individual, but also believes that he was selfish and stubborn for leaving his family and friends to go on his ruthless odyssey into the wild. If McCandless were present, Westerberg would tell him he was imprudent and would try to persuade him to make amends with his family …show more content…
While in Carthage for the first time, McCandless meets Westerberg and is employed to work on the grain mill. Westerberg admires McCandless because “[h]e was the hardest worker [he’s] ever seen” (Krakauer 18). McCandless is willing to do tedious work that would appear repulsive to other employees. His ability to accomplish tasks is analogous to his stubbornness and determination on his nomadic existence in the Alaskan bush. The instant Westerberg meets McCandless, “[he] could tell right away that [McCandless] [is] intelligent” (18) but, “[h]e definitely [is not] what you’d call mechanically minded” (62). Some critics such as Nick Jans would argue that McCandless is not intelligent but rather idiotic and demonstrates arrogance. After McCandless leaves Carthage to embark on his Alaskan expedition, Westerberg receives a letter from McCandless expressing that he has “decided that he is going to live this life for some time to come. The freedom and simple beauty of it is just too good to pass up” (33). After learning of McCandless’s falsification of identity on a tax form, he concludes that McCandless has strains in his relationship with his family and that his venture into the wild is more of an escape from societal norms than the simplicity of enjoying nature and the challenges he has to …show more content…
Critics argue that McCandless is rather unprepared nor does he have the necessary survival skills to survive in the hypothermic winter in the Stampede Trail. McCandless’s unpreparedness leads him to “overestimate [himself], underestimate the country, and [end] up in trouble” (71) Upon McCandless’s return to the Carthage grain mill, he tells Westerberg “he [plans] on staying until April 15th, just long enough to put together a grubstake” (62). Westerberg undoubtedly did not agree with McCandless’s stubborn determination of his vagabond voyage and says, “there [are] gaps in his thinking” (63). In mid-April, Westerberg is shorthanded on employees and makes a final attempt to post pone McCandless’s departure by offering to fly him out to Fairbanks, but “Once [McCandless] made up his mind about something, there was no way of changing it” (67). Despite Westerberg’s endeavour, he could not compel McCandless to stay as he has an extremely headstrong nature and iron-willed stoutheartedness. A few weeks afterwards, Westerberg receives a terse card, which McCandless says his final farewells and that his adventure may prove fatal but he would persevere on completing his odyssey. His letter shows that his stubbornness outweighed his preparedness for his
Do you believe “Alex” Christopher Johnson McCandless was successful? Many people say Alex was not successful in any way. Why burn 25,000 dollars and hitchhike to Alaska. “Some readers admires the boy immensely for his courage and noble ideals; others fulminated that he was a reckless idiot, a wacko, a narcissist who perished out of arrogance and stupidity”(Krakauer, Authors note). I Believe Alex was very successful at times, but there were times he was not at all.
Throughout Chapters Eight and Nine, Krakauer describes and begins to develop the other infamous four explorers stories whom Chris McCandless's story is similar to theirs. Krakauer also notices the lack of sympathy that the Alaskans felt for McCandless when they knew about his death. Many of them felt that he was a foolish child, who arrogantly wondered alone in the wilderness with no shelter or food to keep him alive. Krakauer made his own beliefs clear, that McCandless shared some characteristics and behaviors with these four adventurers, the only one who is truly like him is Everett Ruess, the other three men were a little similar because Carl McCunn was more naive, John Waterman was actually mentally insane and Gene Rosellini was a good
Krakauer made the life of Chris McCandless an extremely educational and shocking book. It is extraordinary how you can transform the life of a young person into such a decent book with a huge differ in the information and enchanting advice about the adventure of that man in the wild. McCandless was youthful person who settled on a decision which horribly and lethally for him, it did not work out. Also, there was no plot or a story because there was nobody to fault. “In 1992, however, there were no more blank spots on the map-not in Alaska, not anywhere.
Book Arrangement Into the Wild displays, a picture of Chris McCandless on the first page then follows with a map of his travel route to the Stampede Trail in Alaska. There is no table of contents, but there are chapters in the book there is also an epilogue. Also, there is an author's note on how he compiles the book. There are several other maps inside the book, so the reader can understand where McCandless is on his journey.
I agree with Callarman, because McCandless was bright, he found his way around difficulties, he constructed a plan and pursued it, with many flaws, but he made it. He was ignorant, because he didn’t see that he did not have to go into Alaska and leave everyone behind for happiness. He had what he needed to be happy with him his whole life, he figured it out once it was too late. His family was there by his side, if he would’ve noticed earlier, he wouldn’t have left and he would have found his happiness at home. McCandless had a chance to embark on a prestigious and profitable career, he would’ve been successful and in time he would be happy again in his family’s
“‘This is the last you will hear from me…I now walk into the wild’” (Krauker, 69) Jon Krauker’s suspenseful novel, Into the Wild, gives an intricate insight into the life and death of Chris McCandless. He knows this trip could be fatal, but he does it anyway, ignoring the fact that his parents and family still cared about him. He was being ignorant toward the people who warned him about going into Alaska on his own and toward his family.
Chris McCandless made a lot of friends during his Alaskan Odyssey. Wayne Westerberg was one of the people who got really attached to Chris or as they all knew him, Alex. Westerberg had always job offers for McCandless; it was his own way of keeping an eye out for him. McCandless and Westerberg became close friends in a matter of days. Wayne always respecting his mysterious side with no questions really helped their friendship.
both authors implies their opinions about the life “in the wild”. For McCandless, he doesn’t really prepares many equipments or skills for his journey to Alaska. It makes him faces many difficulties and even lead him to the worst ending. K gives the example, “Because he lacked a good ,ap, the cable spanning the river also remained incognito. Studying the Teklanika violent flow, McCandess thus mistakenly concluded that is was impossible to reach the eastern shore”(174).
McCandless and McCunn's ventures into the wild had similar intentions and strategies. Although, the outcome of their ventures were slightly different. Both men displayed a certain degree of common sense. They were both friendly, curious, responsible, educated and intelligent men. Having fairly average lives, with big aspirations for their future.
However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden
Christopher McCandless, the protagonist of the novel and film Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer, is not your average guy. Driven by his minimalist ideals and hate for society, he challenged the status quo and embarked on a journey that eventually lead to his unforeseen demise. A tragic hero, defined by esteemed writer, Arthur Miller, is a literary character who makes an error of judgment or has a fatal flaw that, combined with fate and external forces, brings on tragedy. Christopher McCandless fulfills the role of Miller’s tragic hero due to the fact that his tragic flaw of minimalism and aversion towards society had lead him to his death.
At first glance, it would be normal to assume McCandless was not very educated: he didn’t have a stable job, he didn’t prepare for his journey by packing supplies, etc. Jon Krakaur delves into McCandless’ story and reveals that
McCandless values education and is an intelligent man who graduates Emory University with a degree in a grueling major (Krakauer 20). He never contributes much effort into school since the work was easy for him, unlike his colleagues. This makes him extremely confident in all his abilities and is never faced with any problems. The absence of conflict affects him and provides a belief that to find his individuality and identity, he should find something to test his life skills. McCandless is also able to gain traits of being stubborn.
Doing everything flawless with no agitation and finessing the trip to Alaska to fall short to a poisonous plant. The only thing that McCandless could have done to survive would probably be not crossing the river because that was the main complication that got him stuck. To conclude, I would agree with Shaun Callarman at the end because there was plenty of evidence on how inadequate Christopher McCandless’s decisions were and how unpredictable his situation was. There was no other way this journey could have ended for McCandless except if he just stayed home from the beginning. Overall, he was amateurish and incompetent person that could not accomplish his dream, but did inspire endless people to follow their dreams and achieve nature tranquility.
Christopher also knew that his journey could be dangerous and that he could be stepping on the edge of death. Christopher writes this letter to Wayne Westerberg the grain elevator operator who becomes McCandless friend, “If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t ever hear from me again, I want you to know you’re a great man. I now walk into the wild” (Krakauer 69). After reading or listening to the story, many