However, the leader is still the one that make the final decisions. Using this style does not prove that you are a poor leader,instead,it shows that you are holding a strength that makes your employees respect. It is normally used widespreadly when you have part of the information, and your employees have the other parts. Of course,a leader is not expected to know everything—this is why you employ knowledgeable and high-skilled people. Using this style is beneficial to both the leaders and the employees as it allows all employees to become part of the team and allows leaders to make better decisions.
This type of leadership style can be useful when quick decisions are required without consulting a large group of people. It also allows the members of the group to focus on a specific task without worrying about making decisions and it also helps the member to expertise, in particular task which will help them in future. However, autocratic leadership can be useful at times but in some situations, it can be problematic. Many researchers believe that autocratic leadership often leads to lack of a creative solution to the problems as all the decisions are made by the leader without consulting any member of the group. This style can be used efficiently if the leader has the access to the required information that other members of the group don’t have.
Even though this style of leadership may be considered archaic, it still offers many benefits to current teams and their goal-achieving processes. The major pros of the autocratic leadership style, as stated by Joseph (n.d.) are: - Quick decision-making processes. Since the leader is the only one who makes decisions through this style of leadership, there is no waste of time. The leader is the sole responsible for the decision made and therefore it can be made quickly in order to keep up with the competition or prevent problems. - There is close oversight of subordinates.
Managers have little supervisory roles Employees are committed to organization’s success Disadvantages of Theory X and Theory Y Theory X Theory Y Employees must be coerced to work Slow decision making process because employee’s views are incorporated Employees avoid responsibility Sometimes the strategy cannot fit in all situations, it fits in utopia and not reality Employees lack intrinsic motivation Leaders and managers engage in thorough supervision The strategy does not cultivate future leaders Creates a hostile and distrustful working environment The Best Theory In all
Leadership styles should be selected and adapted to fit organizations, situations, groups, and individuals. Autocratic Leadership Style Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have complete power over staff. Staff and team members have little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these are in the best interest of the team or organization. The benefit of autocratic leadership is that it is incredibly efficient. Decisions are made quickly, and the work to implement those decisions can begin immediately.
Dominance is very straightforward in dealing with challenges and has little patience for details. Influencers are outgoing, persuasive and influence others through talking. They tend to be emotional, compliant people adhere to rules, regulations and structure. They appreciate quality and doing things right. Steady people like to be known and work at a steady pace; they do not like sudden changes or ambiguity.
The senior management offers guidance to subordinates, who also can provide work problem or other information to the management. It can help our department faster to solve the problem and the department operates more smoothly. On the other hand, the mechanistic structure, it is a one-way communication system. Which is only the top-level management provides guidance to subordinates. This system also makes the unrealistic decision due to the subordinates are not involved in the decision-making process.
The framework of this standard would also demonstrate any legal and/or regulatory requirements. The reason this is a benefit is because it is helping the business by no law to be broken which would result to a lack of penalties such as fines. The ISO 27001 is also repeatable which would mean any continuous process would be simple to keep up to date especially when/if any regulations change. Another benefit which this standard provides is the fact that it reduces any form of incident being made, and helps support any costs that the business might have. This is helpful because in the long run it provides extra time for productivity, which will allow the project to be done in a shorter amount of time.
Accordingly, he demonstrated that traditional assumptions about manager’s role are not true and he supported his views with some research evidence including his own research, which shows that management is much more than just planning, commanding, coordinating and controlling as proposed by Fayol, so he called Fayol’s elements of management a “folklore”. For instance, from his studies Mintzberg (1975) shows that managers spent most of their time communicating with subordinates and outsiders rather than spending the time planning what they should do. But, when they have to plan in advance, they seem to do it implicitly in the context of daily actions, not in some abstract process that would take them a long time to complete. Although, Fayol (1945) argued that a manager has no regular duties to perform, Mintzberg (1975) found in studies that managers are involved in a number of duties including negotiations, ceremony, rituals and processing information that links organization with its environment. Therefore, this evidence has led to the development of three roles of a manager such as interpersonal roles, informational roles and decision-making roles.
There is no part of rigidity in oral communication. There is flexibility for letting changes in the decisions previously taken. The feedback is impulsive in case of oral communication. Thus, decisions can be made rapidly without any delay. Oral communication is not only time saving, however it also saves upon money and efforts.