Manorialism was the economic system of land ownership in the Middle Ages. Manorialism had many defining characteristics, such as manors and land ownership. Manorialism was the economic system in the Middle Ages. It relied on land and land ownership. Land was the major form of wealth in the Middle Ages, as if someone had land, they could sell it to others to work on in exchange for a portion of their products and military service (this obligation was mutual). (Nardo 14) A manor was the community built on the fief that a lord gave to a vassal. The manor was similar in size to a small village, and the manor house was the main structure on it. The lord and lady, as well as some others such as the bailiff and servants, lived and worked in it. It was fortified for protection, but not so much that it could hold off long sieges. (Frey 1) Surrounding the manor house were the houses and buildings of peasants, as well as a wall used for protection. (Frey 1) The manor was self-sustaining, meaning that it grew or produced everything necessary for it’s survival. An outside product was rarely necessary. The manor works this way because of the peasants who worked on it, many with a specialized profession such as a blacksmith or carpenter, who produced for it. The carpenter would make wood for housing, the blacksmith would make tools, the farmers would produce food, and so on. All manors had some of the same structures; The manor house, a mill, a brewer’s shop, a carpenter’s shop, a
In the 1800’s women were expected to do all of the housework, take care, and educate children, while men were out doing labor work. Women were trying to find their freedom during this time while still doing their jobs. The Cult of Domesticity was important because it showed the tradition of women which was staying at home and doing all of the housework. They did not have the same rights as men did and were not allowed to do many things, such as voting. During this Market Revolution, the economy had changed in a way that most people made things to sell and used that money to buy what they needed.
Land was pivotal to power and stability across kingdoms, it reinforces loyalty to the lords among peasants especially on manor lands as well as it gave the lords soldiers. Greed was also another component which led to disunity as wealthy landowners wanted more than they bargained for. Link: This disunity among the lords led to sieges and battles. Paragraph 2: (119/132) Sieges – QE, GW, Topic: The struggle for power and land resulted in sieges and battles all across Europe with revolutionary weapons.
(STEWE-1) With a fief they got knights to protect the land (Norman 103). (STEWE-2) The lord's wealth came from the food, rent, fines, and fees he collected from the peasants (Cels 18). (SIP-B)
The Middle Ages were a time where kings and nobles owned the land and serfs worked with little pay. Serfs were like slaves that worked on a farm (Doc. 1). They got one day to farm for themselves and the other six they were working for their king or noble (OI). Nobles and kings had knights called vassals (OI). Vassals were knights who protected and served kings and nobles in exchange for land (OI).
Both systems together illustrated the legal, economic, and social aspects of the Middle Ages, were known as the guidelines for the proprietors of the time, and were closely interconnected; nevertheless, they are still known as two separate systems with a few significant disparities, mainly their distinct concepts. The primary difference between the two was that Feudalism was a diplomatic and military framework, while Manorialism was a fiscal framework for the feudal estates of society, and it did not have the military component present in Feudalism. An example of this is how Feudalism included the concept of a fief, which was the agreement between the lord and the vassal to give the vassal land and his protection in exchange for his service.
The Middle Ages was a period that lasted from about 500 to 1500(OI). There were kings and queens, nobles, knights, and peasants (Doc. 1). People were treated and respected differently according to their class(OI). There were special relationships and responsibilities that everyone had. In the Middle Ages feudalism affected people’s lives economically, socially, and politically.
Charlamange also had a love for learning and created a great school inside the palace not just for himself but the benefit of his royal workers and his sons later on. Also built during the reign of Charlemagne was a system that separated people based on the land they owned. The lowest members were called serf. These members had given up their land to another owner in return for assistance. The members of the community that had control over the farms were the manors.
In order to work it also required the loyalty of those who worked and a sense of community. Community was important because it was impossible to survive by one’s self. The more hands that could work meant the more food that could be harvested. Society in medieval ages was held together by loyalty and honour. Honour codes were set in place, and the people followed them.
Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with
Serfs paid back for what the lord gave them by providing labor, primarily. The specific services asked for included farming fields, caring for livestock, and other tasks on the manor (Nardo 27). The amount of labor that was required of serfs varied from manor to manor and based on the amount of land the serf farmed for himself (Bennett 103). What was common, however, was that serfs owed two types of work to their lord: week-works and boon works (Bennett 106). Week-works were the work that was done on a weekly basis, and boon works were done as extra labor occasionally throughout the year (Bennett 106).
Was also a judge in court. Non-hereditary nobility included Knights, Peasants, Freemen, Serfs and Slaves. Knight - Protect the Lord in his army and watch over his manor Slave - Were bought and sold as human workers.
The major portions within this were the life on the manor, and the trade and commerce in the time period. First off, the life on the manor itself was the entire “economic side of feudalism” (Document 2). The work of the serfs (peasants tied to the land) for the lords was the support of the economic system of manoralism, and the Middle Ages as a whole. The serfs had to go through tedious and excruciating work in order to continue living on the land (Document 2). On top of all the work they did, they also had to pay taxes to the lord in order to continue living on the land.
In the Middle Ages, the power of people impacted the society, because of the Feudal System. In other words, the rankings of people. There were four groups. The Kings and Queens were at the top, then the nobles, the knights, and last peasants and serfs(Doc. 1). Serfs and peasants had very little land given and they even had to provide food that they farmed for the knights and nobles.
The manor system was based on rights and obligations between a lord and his serfs. When the killing spree in London, Quentavic and Rochester happened the feudal system helped put everything back into order ( doc 8 ). This helped govern areas and it gave control over different regions. In exchange for military protection and other services, a lord granted land to a vassal. Then the vassal was to protect the lord from invasions and other attacks.
The social classes of the Elizabethan era are similar to todays through the merchants control of the middle class, the support for the poor, and the separate lifestyles of the ranks. All of the classes had different rules and roles in society. For example, the yeomanry was made up of farmers and craft makers that lived simple lives. The size of this class was similar to the size of today's middle class. Improving and expanding their land is how they spent their money.