The Republican Theory, or form of government, is one where the power is placed in the people, mainly through representatives whom are delegated by the people. The purpose of this was to increase fairness as well as a spread of common welfare where all citizens would be able to have freedom under established laws. Two men, Aristotle and Michael Sandel believe that the Republic Theory is one of, if not the best form of government to establish, and have thus based their beliefs on it. Aristotle focused his writings on specific topics within the Republic Theory, the first of which was the principle of citizenship. Aristotle believed that constitutions were used as ways to organize the citizens within a given city.
Hamilton became involved with politics. To succeed his goal of making the world better he created a new constitution. Also, after the war he created a new law office ( Clemens p.7 ). He had a great contribution to the government world and also the great America. The motivation that Hamilton got was very big and helpful to him.
An example of a republic is the United States of America. Which has been a republic since 1788. Today, in the evolving political state which the world is experiencing, one might wonder, which is a more effective method of ruling, a monarchy or a republic? In this report, the pros and cons of both systems are discussed through logic. It is seen that a republic is widely preferred, provided that it allows the public to freely choose one of their own to rule, and that chosen person is frequently changed.
Representative government is a well-known world practice and it was first developed in Great Britain, Switzerland and the United States of America. Then it expanded to the British Commonwealth countries and other places which include Malaysia. According to Bond and Smith (2013) “Representative democracy can be defined as a system of government where ordinary citizens do not make governmental decisions themselves but choose public officials-representative-of people- to make decisions for them” (p. 13). The main goal of representative democracy is to protect the rights and interests of the citizens in the country by giving them the freedom of speech. Hence, the leader holds a huge responsibility and play the major role as they had been elected during the elections to represent their nation.
Liberal ideas were in favor of the majority in the country so it paved way for further unification as an independent state which emerged from all hierarchy. In order to defeat other powerful enemies, a strong state would have more advantages as it served as a collective defense. Nationalism accelerated the process of unification since it utilized the military force and political support from a large number of patriots and liberalists. Nationalism which was the emphasizing of the national identifying, and aspiration of independence promotes the unification of Italy and Germany because it focused on the majority’s voice in the country. James Stuart Mill, (Doc 2) who was a proponent of national identity, accentuated the necessity of a constitution that concerns the tendency of the whole society in a solid state.
Leadership is very compulsory in political process, connection among People, Political Leader and Political Party is very complex. Politician generally belong to a political party, Political parties role is articulating the combination of interest in society. Media should be free and fair to report on the political parties campaigns so public can make the difference between them. Media should deliver the information to public on how to vote and told them the importance of their vote. Most important source of the public about political selections and elections is usually media If media is biased then it can be effect the result and change the views of public.
"An educated, enlightened and informed population is one of the surest ways of promoting the health of a democracy." ~ Nelson Mandela, 6 October 2003. Introduction: Democracy is a system of government for the citizens to choose their leaders and to hold them accountable for their policies and demeanour in office. The saying “laws are made for the people by the people” is true as people vote for candidates who are elected representatives who 's job it is to make law. If state and lawmakers are careful in identifyings societiy’s needs and problems, law should improve quality of life.
They vote on any politics issues from the smallest to the biggest in harmony. Obviously, direct democracy is more democratic; the majority can have the best. This inspired us an idea of direct democracy could work well today in the United States as well; nonetheless, it is too idealistic. This essay will clarify why government is important to our life, the strength and weakness of direct democracy compare to representative democracy, and why direct democracy is unfeasible for America. Undoubtedly, government is one of the most important components of people’s life.
As a matter of fact one of best known political systems today is the democracy. Yet two popular types prevail - direct and representative. In direct also known as pure democracy, people personally participate in the decision-making and governing process. Their vote has straightforward power over what happens and the majority rules. Whereas in the representative democracy we - the citizens elect politicians, who speak for us and likewise decide on initiatives.
Therefore provides the link between the individual voters to the political system, for instance the government. With such a link created through voting, it legitimately serves the political system to the extent of democracy and shape policies so that they accord with the popular wishes and interest (Green, 79). In most of the parliamentary democracies in the world, for instance the U.S, the straightforward and easiest form of political participation is through voting. This research paper will give in sight on the importance of a person’s vote, the reasons why they vote and engage in non-voting political activities in the process of an election. Hypothesis Across the political spectrum the political systems are always in a deplorable state.