2415 Words10 Pages

Section 2 – Features and characteristics of screening models

There are a number of selection methods or screening models available to managers when faced with choosing potential projects. These include several numeric (Quantitative) and non-numeric (Qualitative) models. Each of these models have their benefits, however, to be effective, they should all share common characteristics. Firstly they should be realistic. This means that an effective model must reflect the organisations objectives, strategy and mission. It should also take into account the availability of resources such as money or personnel, and account for performance, cost and time, as well as the potential risk that the project carries. The second characteristic is capability.*…show more content…*

Companies tend to favour financial models as they evaluate the benefit of projects in terms of profitability and return on investment, or time it takes to repay an investment. Numeric models use numbers as the basis for selecting whether a project should be undertaken or not. Examples of numeric models include;

Payback Period

The payback period refers to the length of time it takes for a project to repay its initial investment. The project which pays back the investment in the shortest time is the most desired under this model. It is calculated by dividing the initial investment by annual cash flows and has several advantages. It is simple to use as it utilises accounting information which is readily available to decision makers to identify cash flows. It reduces uncertainty as it selects the project with the shortest payback period. It is helpful to organisations which may have limited cash flow, as it measures the speed of cash recovery. This method also quantifies the criteria for a project in a manner decision makers are more familiar*…show more content…*

However, IRR differs from NPV as it provides an answer in percentage terms rather than an absolute figure. IRR determines the discount rate at which an investment will return a zero net present value. Organisations use this technique to determine if investment in a project makes financial sense. Thus, organisations will calculate the estimated IRR when evaluating one or more potential projects. When faced with multiple projects, management will choose the one with the highest rate of return, assuming it exceeds the cost of capital. One advantage of this model is that IRR uses cash flows, instead of accounting profits. It also takes the time value of money into consideration. This method also considers the timings of cash flows. However, like NPV, IRR does not consider risk associated with later cash flows, and is more difficult to understand than other techniques. IRR also requires the use of an interpolation

There are a number of selection methods or screening models available to managers when faced with choosing potential projects. These include several numeric (Quantitative) and non-numeric (Qualitative) models. Each of these models have their benefits, however, to be effective, they should all share common characteristics. Firstly they should be realistic. This means that an effective model must reflect the organisations objectives, strategy and mission. It should also take into account the availability of resources such as money or personnel, and account for performance, cost and time, as well as the potential risk that the project carries. The second characteristic is capability.

Companies tend to favour financial models as they evaluate the benefit of projects in terms of profitability and return on investment, or time it takes to repay an investment. Numeric models use numbers as the basis for selecting whether a project should be undertaken or not. Examples of numeric models include;

Payback Period

The payback period refers to the length of time it takes for a project to repay its initial investment. The project which pays back the investment in the shortest time is the most desired under this model. It is calculated by dividing the initial investment by annual cash flows and has several advantages. It is simple to use as it utilises accounting information which is readily available to decision makers to identify cash flows. It reduces uncertainty as it selects the project with the shortest payback period. It is helpful to organisations which may have limited cash flow, as it measures the speed of cash recovery. This method also quantifies the criteria for a project in a manner decision makers are more familiar

However, IRR differs from NPV as it provides an answer in percentage terms rather than an absolute figure. IRR determines the discount rate at which an investment will return a zero net present value. Organisations use this technique to determine if investment in a project makes financial sense. Thus, organisations will calculate the estimated IRR when evaluating one or more potential projects. When faced with multiple projects, management will choose the one with the highest rate of return, assuming it exceeds the cost of capital. One advantage of this model is that IRR uses cash flows, instead of accounting profits. It also takes the time value of money into consideration. This method also considers the timings of cash flows. However, like NPV, IRR does not consider risk associated with later cash flows, and is more difficult to understand than other techniques. IRR also requires the use of an interpolation

Related

## Newmont Case

977 Words | 4 PagesA high ROE is preferred for a high dividend to the hareholder. ROE depends upon the capital invested in the company. If more capital investment is there in the company less will be

## Feasibility Study In Project Management

1145 Words | 5 PagesAs a result of the time value of the money, NPV considers the compounding of the discount rate over the span of the project. The NPV of a project mirrors how much cash inflow or outflow and it measures up to or surpasses the amount of project capital required to reserve it. An organization utilize NPV as a method for contrasting their relative profitability with assurance that exclusive the most lucrative endeavors are sought while evaluating numerous projects. A higher NPV shows that the project is more fruitful. The forecasted cash outflow and inflow for every period must be recognized and additionally the expected discount rate in order to compute NPV.

## Capital Budgeting Case Study

2432 Words | 10 PagesThe assumption of the project cash flows are reinvested at IRR are not included. This makes MIRR has better signal of a project’s true profitability. Once there is conflict between IRR and NPV, MIRR method can be used. Project with higher MIRR should be preferred. G. (2) What are the MIRR’s advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis the NPV?

## Essay On Household Saving

1173 Words | 5 PagesFriedman based his work on the intuition that income is more volatile than consumption. Consumption is based on long-term expectations about income since households prefer to smooth consumption over time and avoid short-term fluctuations (Meghir, 2004). The implication of this theory on household behavior is that household will save today if their income is higher than the future and vice versa. For example, in economic crises current income becomes lower than future income so people dissave to cover current consumption (Berry, Williams, & Waldron,

## Case Study: Dollar General

760 Words | 4 PagesThe DCF method has a lot of advantages over the Multiples approach, one would be that the DCF method considers the future of a company and values the future cash flows for every debt or equity holder. So, this method forces us to explicitly explore and analyze the fundamental factors that drive business value creation. Another advantage is the discount factor which shows us if a given company will be able to generate cash flows equivalent to its riskiness. A disadvantage of the DCF method is its complexity. The Multiples approach is usually only used to get a rough estimate how much a company could be worth.

## Jarrow Ltd Leadership Style Analysis

1492 Words | 6 PagesTherefore, ARR over estimate the profit (higher profit) and ARR don’t count time value of money plus it doesn’t adjust to risk too. On the other hand NPV is better because, it take count the time value of money and it consider cash flow plus it adjusted to risk also. However, NPV difficult to calculate and difficult to find accurate discount rate of return which take time leads to high cost. But, Finance staffs have better knowledge on finance than Mr.Javins as they specialized in finance. So Mr.Javins should consult with them when making any financial decisions to get accurate

## Trade-Off Theory Vs Trade Off Theory

799 Words | 4 PagesIn light of this when profits are maximised the firm make decisions to access shareholders wealth through the means of equity. For instance such examples of equity are: ordinary share, preference shares, hybrids and bonds. In addition, Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Dividend Growth Model (DGM) is used to calculate measures of equity for the organisation. Inasmuch with cost of equity are investments can be obtained to generate cash causing the firm to be affluent and profitable through investment appraisal decision such as net present value, average rate of return, internal rate of return and payback period. The money retrieved at the end of the investments will be utilised in the form of

## Pros And Cons Of Observation In Research

739 Words | 3 PagesIt is normally available for free or at low cost and can save a researcher a lot of time, effort and money. • There may be situations where the researcher needs to focus on collecting both primary data and secondary data. Secondary data being available with relative ease allows a researcher to focus his/her energies on the collection of primary data. • Secondary data is normally collected in the best possible manner and thus can be used as a means of measuring the quality of the primary data. This will allow the researcher to focus on finding out the qualitative and quantitative gaps if any and figure out how to fill in the

## David Hume's Virtue Theory Of Money

1715 Words | 7 PagesLabour is compensated by money, therefore the exchangeable value of all products is measured by the quantity of money, rather than the quantity of labour. This forms the bullion theory of value and the labour theory of value. The Bullion theory is dependent on the value of gold and solver which is sometimes more volatile than other commodities and harder to get. Therefore, it is not a very reliable theory to judge the value of a commodity. On the other hand, the labor theory works with equal quantities and value of labor, thus, making it more reliable to use because labour wages are decent benchmark for price levels as they have a nominal and real price.

## Royal Dutch Shell Merger Analysis

1433 Words | 6 PagesAs the capital structure changes, there is a definite effect on the balance sheet of the company. There is financial flexibility by using stock. Payment solely by stock might reduce the profitability ratio of the company and if it is by cash, the company will show higher liquidity ratio. Not all firms have liquid cash to complete the transaction so they deal by involving both cash and stock as the risk will be divided and hence it is the most attractive method of financing the

### Newmont Case

977 Words | 4 Pages### Feasibility Study In Project Management

1145 Words | 5 Pages### Capital Budgeting Case Study

2432 Words | 10 Pages### Essay On Household Saving

1173 Words | 5 Pages### Case Study: Dollar General

760 Words | 4 Pages### Jarrow Ltd Leadership Style Analysis

1492 Words | 6 Pages### Trade-Off Theory Vs Trade Off Theory

799 Words | 4 Pages### Pros And Cons Of Observation In Research

739 Words | 3 Pages### David Hume's Virtue Theory Of Money

1715 Words | 7 Pages### Royal Dutch Shell Merger Analysis

1433 Words | 6 Pages