On the other hand, manager can be a true manager only if he has got traits of leader in him. Manager at all levels are expected to be the leaders of work groups so that subordinates willingly carry instructions and accept their guidance. A person can be a leader by virtue of all qualities in him. Leaders and Managers can be compared on the following basis: Basis Manager Leader Origin A person becomes a manager by virtue of his position. A person becomes a leader on basis of his personal qualities.
First, due to some personality characters, some people naturally acquire leadership roles. This means some people have given god gifted qualities which enable them to become leaders by nature. Second, sometimes some people face a crisis or an important event in life. People respond that critical event and showed extraordinary leadership qualities. This points out that an important or critical event at any point of time causes a person to perform beyond his or her own thought.
In the training, we attain people attention, motivates them to care them and encourage them to achieve the common goals that what we do in the leadership we engage followers, motivates them shows them the clear vision to achieve the common goal. But there is some difference between the leadership and training. High-performance teams always build under the leadership not by the training. Training tells us what to do and how to do the things or specific task and leadership tells the same thing with the pride and care. Leaders select the right person for the right job because they know about the strengths and weakness of their team vs compare to the trainer just tell us how to perform in the particular situation with specific behavior.
Determination means that the desire that a leader has in ensuring that a situation is handled properly. Deamination is an important attribute that characterizes a leader. A leader who is determined is very much proactive and is willing to do a lot of things to ensure that they achieve their set objectives in the required time. A highly determined leader according to the contingency theory is very much willing to persevere in handling a situation until he or she ensures that the situation is handled properly. According to this theory the leader is very effective meaning that he is able to show that he or she is the dominant factor in handling various situations.
This assessment is measuring the level and skills of the personal leadership. Also, the leader should not only guide others to ensure great professional success, but also to inspire, influence, and most importantly, motivate his employees. It is important that the leader should motivate himself first to become a motivational leader. He should be striving toward excellence and that by committing to becoming everything he is capable of becoming. Also, motivational leader can be throwing whole his heart into doing the job in an excellent way and keeping continually for ways to help employees to improve their performance and achieve their goals.
The word contingency means depending upon. Those proposing contingency theories realize that a leader must adjust. The hallmark of these theories is context and in a more profound sense, everything is interdependent. To a certain extent contingency leadership theories are extensions of the trait theory, in the sense that human traits are related to the situation in which the leaders exercise their leadership. It is generally accepted within the contingency theories that leader are more likely to express their leadership when they feel that their followers will be
Theoritical Framework The researcher adapted the theory of Burns where leaders and followers engage in a mutual process of raising one another to higher levels motivation. This raised the bar by appealing to higher ideals and values of followers. This encourages people to collaborate and work as a team. Below is the illustration of transformational leadership theory that explains that if leaders have these characteristics or behaviour and able to convince the people in the organization, success would be possible. With these perspectives, a leader must possess necessary traits or character to influence others to run the organization or the unit effectively.
Leaders can be designated by the organization or emerge from the group during its development. Either way, leaders function to mobilize the group into action and give direction as to what approach the group should take to completes tasks and overcome challenges. Interestingly, leaders do not all use the same technique to lead but, apply different leadership styles to achieve the desired result. A good leader can be a powerful catalyst for group member engagement and increase the effectiveness of the work group. While a poor leader will frustrate group members and discourage them from working together and putting forth their best efforts.
Coaching is the process of equipping an employee like James with the tools, knowledge, and opportunities that are necessary for them to become better in handling their assigned responsibilities at the workplace. In most organizations, coaching has been identified as a key player in the process of leadership and management. In most cases, coaching is concerned with the growth of the employee, personal and professional development of the employee, the removal of roadblocks that interfere with the performance of the employee while encouraging the employee to be creative (Aguinis, 2013). During the coaching process, the employee is encouraged to make use of his knowledge and experience to create and develop his own personal best practices, connections,
Being a leader managing one’s emotion is very vital for his leadership. As described by Ashkhanasy and Tse (2000), all types of leadership resolve around “mobilizing human resources toward the attainment of organizational goal”. Researcher have emphasized on the proper use of emotions to become a successful leader. Pescosolido (2000) argues that leader use emotions for securing assistance within groups, to encourage groups and improve the required communication. One field of leadership that seems promising for heaving a relationship with emotional intelligence is transformational leadership.