Charisma in Greek means “divinely inspired gift.” As charismatic leadership has been the focus to scholars, there are various definition to the meaning. Max Weber, is considered to be the contributor behind the theory (Lussier & Achua, 2007). He used the word charisma to describe a certain authority system, apart from rational-legal and traditional which are thought as the references for leadership back at the time. This charismatic type focuses not on the authority but rather follower’s perceptions toward the leadership’s qualities. Charisma according to Weber is something that triggers followers’ commitment and lead them make results which go beyond obligations, since the followers’ believe in charismatic leader’s ultra talents and gifts. …show more content…
Personal characteristic is one of the most invesigated factor of charimatic leadership. The most common traits are leaders’ visonary, self-confidence to their abilities, achievement oriented towards the task, high level of personal dynamic, and trusting/ role-model over followers (Nahavandi, 1997). The examples taken can be Dr. Martin Luther King, presedent Frankin D. Roosevelt who took America out of the great depression, Rudy Giuliani who reconstruct New York City to a better quality living place, Apples’ co-founder Steve Jobs that revolutionzied the way public perceive personal computer. These are all leaders that inpire followers through their words and …show more content…
But is it really so? There are several issues rised when concerning the dark side of charismatic leadership. According to Bass, there are two types of charismatic leadership as socialized and personalized. The former one tends to serve the community and have the same objectives as the followers (1985). On the other hand, the latter one often possess personality as narcissistic and egoistic, and display obedience and authority to the followership. Hence, it is hard to judge whether charismatic leadership is often a good thing. There are apparently no evidence indicating that charismatic leadership is a compulsory element behind success. To add on the point, the “charisma” of certain leaders might also pose problems for the company as when the charismatic leaders step out of the business (Gibson et al., 1999). Despite the several points composed on charismatic leadership throughout the literature review, one could not assert that “charisma” is a neccessity for the dynamic nature
Charisma is “a special gift that certain individuals possess that gives them the capacity to do extraordinary things.” (Pg. 164
However, while according to different authors, “It’s true that no amount of training or practice will turn you into Churchill or Martin Luther King Jr.”, the charismatic training “can make you more charismatic in the eyes of your followers, and that will invariably make you a more effective leader.” (Antonakis, Fenley, & Liechti, 2012) Conclusion If you add up all the basic properties of charisma, the main factors are the following: the ability of the leader to stand out from the crowd, emphasizing its uniqueness, unity of the followers, and finally, to the loyalty of the masses to the leader. Despite the exclusivity of the leader and his difference from the masses, they must have something in common that unites them: it may be a common enemy,
He is verbally eloquent and holds the ability to communicate with his followers on a deeper level. Charismatic leaders are role models; they inspire devotion in others. A perfect example of a charismatic leader would be Stephen Colbert. Stephen Colbert shows his charisma through the loyalty of his followers. Colbert recognizes his viewers
Those individuals who were believed to have these inherent skills were people of very influential status, wartime heroes and those of great wealth. The people who emerge or are most picked to lead have distinctive drives and character profiles (Nicholson, 2013, p.16). Leadership Thought Development from 1900 – 1970 The thought of leadership evolved from the Great Man Theory to Trait Theory and Behavior Theory. The trait theory focuses on identifying distinctive personality traits and characteristics that are associated to successful leadership.
Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.
Critical Review of Leadership Theories There have been a variety of theorists who have tried to understand how good leaders acquire their skills and whether the components which make up a successful leader are hereditary or learned. Many Studies have been made using twins to identify that about forty percent of differences in personality are hereditary. (Vernon et al., 1998) From this we can see that it is not only a matter of whether a person in born with these skills but one must also build on them to become a successful leader.
Mahatma Ghandi is an example of a leader with charisma. He is known for his non-violent protests and selflessness to promote peace in our
From the mainstream perspective, he has shown different types of leadership. It also includes several theories like trait, skill, behavior, contingency and transformational. Trait theory states that the personality of a person would determine if he or she will be able to lead. In case of Steve Jobs, his personality was radiant and flamboyant. He was confident, committed and charismatic to take any leap or risk with the support of his team and customers to pursue his aspiration (Katzenbach, 2012).
Authentic leaders have a positive impact on followers, groups, and organization (Yaacoub, 2016). These leaders can be motivating on one hand and change to another style depending on the condition. Both leadership styles look for ways to partner with people, groups or organization. Servant uses measures to a leaders effectiveness (Reed, Vidaver-Cohet & Colwell, 2011).
" Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behavior of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action." - Chester Barnard Max Weber 's Theory: Types of Leadership In Max Weber 's theory, he wrote about three types of leaderships: Bureaucratic, Charismatic, and Traditional. Weber was one of the first of the theorists to recognize that leadership itself was situational in nature, and that effective individuals needed to move dynamically from one type of leadership style to another to remain successful. 1] Bureaucratic Leadership "Bureaucratic administration means fundamentally domination through knowledge." Bureaucratic leadership is based upon fixed official duties under a hierarchy of authority, applying a system of rules for management and decision-making.
This model states that in this 21st century, it is impossible to rely on one management style to fit all situations (Educational-business-articles.com, 2016). In other words managers and leaders must be flexible, in order to get the best result out of their teams and individuals. In addition, this theory allows management and leadership to be able to identify and accurately diagnose the situation and vary employees’ behavior accordingly to the situation (Yukl and Mahsud, 2010). This will enable management and leadership at CIBCFCIB to select appropriate types of leadership behavior for each type of situation. Moreover, another impact that this theory has on organizational strategy whereby Charismatic leaders at CIBCFCIB can minimize various types of behaviour by increasing competent employees.
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
Introduction At the present competitive world leadership is a dynamic process where influencing others is the most important issues. That’s why exercising power is one of the most important issue to be a charismatic leader and this power doesn’t come automatically it comes after advocating other fellow members. Here, one thing is most important to remind that the power should be imposed and exercise within the worth and boundaries of the leaders. However organization’s culture, its mission, vision, short-term strategies all these reform the leadership process.
Charismatic can be learnt. Uncle Lim had the ability to bring the people together. The people willingly did everything for him and followed him where he shared it in his book, “If you build a successful business and organization, always believe that the most valuable asset of a company is its people. It is the people that make up the organization. It is the people that run the organization.
Question 1 Are leadership and management different from one another? If so, how? Answer: Leadership- The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals.