In all honesty Charlemagne was a great emperor. He is the reason that the kingdom transitioned into the Modern Europe we know now. His two policies expansion and christianity helped him being a good emperor. He had a vision and he did a really good job at making his vision come true. He wanted all the Germanic people in one kingdom and he wanted them to convert to christianity.
Charlemagne was a conqueror and founder of the Roman church. Known as “Charles the Great”, who was a marvelously, magnificent ruler, he conquered massive land in Europe during AD 742. Charlemagne was a talented, terrific, tremendous conqueror. He was kind, religious, and was a strong warrior. He ruled “By the sword and by the cross”.
Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, ruled the Franks from 768–814 A.D. He was a kindhearted man, who also a merciless warrior. Charlemagne was resolved to expand his kingdom to a grandiose empire, which he completed especially well. He also converted the nation to Christianity and the nation’s customary language to Latin. People thought he ruled with the sword and with the cross.
It was one of the most important emperors of the Middle Ages and of all the time. He was King of the Franks (768-814) and Roman emperor (800-814). But, who was Charles? does the end really justify the means? Brutally and death should be justified
The mighty Roman Empire was divided for easier control in 285 CE by emperor Diocletian. The wealthy eastern empire lived on as the Byzantine Empire, while the western half declined into the middle ages from 500-1500 CE. In an attempt to revive the Holy Roman Empire, the Frankish Empire emerges, ruled most importantly by Charlemagne. In this time period, the Church was able to become higher than the state with a partnership between the pope and the emperor. The Frankish Empire lasted 35 years after Charlemagne’s death, but his three grandsons went to war over who the successor of the Frankish empire was.
There are many examples in the document that reinforce Charlemagne’s status as a Christian warrior, particularly in his use of oaths and relics. First, Charlemagne’s war victories that were “…most skillfully planned and successfully fought...,” led him to the expansion of the Frank kingdom. He was also favored by the surrounding nations which helped the kingdom expansion by double. Charlemagne also valued his friendships with other kings or emperors in the area. It is stated that he left cities on the coast to the Greek Emperor for the sake of their friendship, “and because of the treaty that he had made with him”.
As the papacy grew some positive and negative outcomes developed for Christianity and civilization. The positive outcomes can be seen in the reign of both Pope Leo and Pope Gregory. Leo was very grounded in his nature of Christ. He was vital in his battle against the Huns and Attila. Pope Gregory also increased positivity in papacy for Rome.
Churches were tax exempt and bishops became powerful. They were governors of the poor and even judges for small disputes. Constantine and his successors were impressed by the unity and expansionist goals of the Christian Church and wanted to increase the unity of his empire by fostering the universal outreach of the Christian church. The legacy of Constantine included his conversion to Christianity and the conversion to Christianity of the Roman Empire.
The crusade was typically made up of peasants due to the numbers of soldiers. Even though the peasants weren’t very skilled, it still the job because in 1099 the Christians beat the Turks and took over the Holy Lands. This was a very important crusade because it slowed down the Muslims for a decent amount of time, it brought Christians together, and it changed the lifestyle of many people throughout that time. Victory was
People would describe Charlemagne as “large and strong person (Shah)”. Charlemagne was adored by many people in many nations because of the work he has done. When you read through Einhard biography, it was difficult to find any negative traits about Charlemagne. It was Charlemagne dedication that drove his military to successes. “Through extensive military campaigns and attention to effective rule, Charlemagne constructed and administered the largest empire in Europe since the collapse of Roman rule in 476” (Siver,314), this tribute to the first Europe (Siver,313), which were divided up and lead to internal wars after his death in
When Charlemagne ascended the throne and had full control of the empire, he wanted to not only rule both his people and Romans, he was also interested in his people and the ones he conquered to convert to Christianity. (Pages 258-259). Charlemagne exceedingly cared about government as much as he cared about religion, which is why one of the things he did when first became an emperor was to make sure that the Pope Hadrian I, got his land back from the Lombard Kingdom and he has also helped the Pope on countless occasions. (Pg. 259). Yes, Charlemagne was truly successful in linking religion and governing, his people or the Romans did not rebel against him and during his ruling he was able to offer people opportunities to learn and deepen their understanding of the Christian faith.
Before 300 CE, Rome was polytheistic, believed in multiple gods. Being polytheistic was a benefit because of all the cultural diffusion in their large area and grand population. The supernatural world is very significant in the roman cultural belief system. Then in 300 CE, Romans adopted Christianity as their religion. Before hand, christians were executed and lowered ranked, when Christianity was not their main religion.
William is a distant cousin to Edwards, so he confirms his title because he has blood association. William states that a few years ago, Edward choose Williams to be his heir. In 1051 Edward the confessor promised to make Edward the air of England which promised him a large leap of power. In 1066 Edward changed his mind and gave crown to Harold who had no tie to the throne.
Charlemagne, king and later emperor of the franks, and King Louis IX of France, king, saint, and crusader, have very similar social and cultural backgrounds but a different political background. Charlemagne and King Louis have very similar social backgrounds because they both were born in a royal family and took the throne as kings at a young age due to the deaths of their fathers. Charlemagne was born in 742, in the Merovingian family, from which the franks chose their kings from. He was the son of Beterada of Laon and Pepin the Short. His father became the king of Franks in 751 after the death of his grandfather.