Following Charlemagne’s death in 814, the stability of Western Europe was shattered into pieces. While Charlemagne had greatly advanced his empire, he failed to establish any administrative system that would live on past his death. Because of this and the frequently occurring Viking invasions, the people of Western Europe began to form relationships with each other for the sole purpose of creating stability. These relationships eventually feudalism, which was a system in which various classes of people supported each other while living in a community based in a manor (Fiero 259). First, I’ll explain the exchange of protection the lords and vassals made with those around them (Fiero 259-60). Next, I’ll cover what the role serfs and clergy held …show more content…
The serf’s form of exchange was known as manorialism (Mckay et al. 235). As to follow through on their part of the contract with their lord, serfs were tied to the land they lived on and were not allowed to leave (Fierro 265). In addition to this, since the majority of serfs were farmers, they were responsible for giving a third of the crops they produced to the lord’s manor (Fierro 265; Mckay et al. 235). This exchange worked out well for both the lord and his serfs, as they each received something they needed. While the lord gained people to do manual toil for him, the serfs gained protection. Although serfs certainly relied on their lord, they also relied on their fellow serfs. Serfs lived in the village of the lord’s manor with between fifteen and twenty other families, and even as many as fifty on large manors (Fierro 265). They worked together in their labor, and some even developed agricultural technology with each other such as the heavy-wheeled plow and the tandem harness (266). The serfs’ relationship with the clergy was just as, if not more important than their relationships with each other. The serfs relied on the clergy to administer the sacraments to them, as well as to prepare them for their eternal state. Because serfs sometimes worked dangerous jobs on the manor, death could take them at any time. If serfs found themselves on their …show more content…
With a weak ruler in place following Charlemagne’s death, people were left searching for someone to look to. People have a natural need for leadership which is why the system of feudalism worked so well. Vassals had a lord to protect and were protected in return, serfs were given instruction on how to live their life, and members of clergy were able to help others from within the safety of the lord’s manor. Everyone had a place, and everyone knew what that place was. What’s specifically fascinating to me about feudalism though, is that it occurred naturally (Fiero 259). No one had to set up a complex system and then push people into it, the serfs, clergy, vassals, and lords set up the system themselves by naturally becoming a part of it. Feudalism was formed because people’s intuition led them to become a part of a self-sustaining community within the bounds of a lords’ manor. Feudalism’s spontaneous and successful breakthrough into the Middle Ages is what makes it so
To add on, the roles of the peasants was to give their services to nobles. Last but not least, the bottom dwellers
How did late medieval governments shape life in positive and in negative ways? The government shaped life in a positive way by protecting the kingdom from invaders and keeping people safe. The monarchs had armies and lots of knight at their disposal. The knights had a code of honor so they were nice to women and others.
Source B, "Chart of Medieval European feudalism," and source c, "Map of the spread of Islam" are both connected to the power of political. After reading the details in Source B, it is clear that there was a social pyramid to show who was on the top and bottom, the money range of all the people, and what they did. The head of the social pyramid was the king, the king had all the power, he has all the money, and makes the rules. The next person was the lords and they were military aids and they were loyal. The second to last person on the pyramid was the knights.
In document 3, the lords responded to the peasants by claiming that the lower-class were their property, having been purchased by them for “a considerable sum of money.” The lords continued to mock the serfs, explaining to them that they are certain their social status would not hinder their positions in heaven. The peasants who claimed their only master was Jesus, stating, “Christ has purchased and redeemed us with His precious blood2,” were then told that that the council was sympathetic to their plea: to regain their independence, they would simply have to pay the sum of which they are worth. An ironic proposition, as the nobles know very well the serf’s wealth was negligible. This response to the peasants’ plea was fuel to the fire of revolt.
During the Dark Ages, the European continent was in total chaos. There were multiple wars going around the continent by different tribes who were trying to take total control of the land. The people living in that time period did not have a chance to obtain knowledge or live in a peaceful society. People were living in constant fear and fighting for survival. Things were about to change very soon because the light was going to shine onto Europe.
Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with
Feudalism is a political, economic, and social system based on loyalty, the holding of land and military service. Local Lords formed a strict code of behavior and allegiance which became the foundation of life. On the other side of the world both Europe and Japan developed the Feudalism system due to weak centralized government, lack of resource, shared political value and more. Both of these systems are similar, but at the same time different. In both systems warriors strictly obeyed the code of conduct as a way of life.
One of the most important part of Feudal society the oath of Homage and Fealty. The Oath of Homage and Fealty required many things from both the lord and his vassal. The vassal was required to give the king, which he was declaring loyalty to, a certain set of obligations(Nelson). This would provide system between the vassal and the lord that allowed for a smooth economy to run because both the vassal and the king benefit and they have a system of trade. The vassal also had their own set of vassals called sub vassals, that were obligated to give to the vassal in return for a few things.
Medieval societies are most commonly known for their knights, tales of chivalry, and damsels in distress; however, a huge segment is missing: the system that even allowed people to become knights, and that kept a kingdom well balanced. The feudal system allowed for people in any position on the social ladder to provide for not only themselves, but for others above and below them. The manor permitted for this system to perform properly because it gave everyone an opportunity to have a stable job, and it also provided any feudal society with a steady or even prosperous economy. To help the manor function accordingly, a steward was often employed to keep a manor in check, to be a record keeper, and to help organize the crucial records he took.
The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.
In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.
This proves that feudalism worked better for Europe than it did in Japan. There were several different results that came from feudalism that resulted in a hierarchy. After the fall of Europe they built a society based off of a pyramid of power. At the top was the king.
Long before the Renaissance, government was based on feudalism, the idea of dividing society based on class. People earned a set wage for their class’ jobs. Children that were born into a family were the same class as their family. Also, thinking was deeply religious and even art and sculpture all were based on religious figures. However, humanists quashed this idea.
Feudalism remained mostly because of the inheritance of titles, tight structure and relationships between lords and vassals, and the importance of agriculture due to a lack of
Lords had to keep their peasants content and organized in order to generate the production they needed, so small village court systems were established. As the lives of the peasants did, the court cases mostly pertained to agriculture, seen in the Manorial court, “All the ploughmen of Great Ogbourne are convicted by the oath of twelve men... because by reason of their default [the land] of the lord was ill-ploughed whereby the lord is damaged to the amount of 9s... And Walter Reaper is in mercy for concealing [i.e. not giving information as to] the said bad ploughing. Afterwards he made fine with the lord with 1 mark” (Source 80).