Nat Crocker
Introduction
Sexual selection is the an accepted theory that is found when a gender of a species chooses (selects ) his or her mate. Charles Darwin put it as, “…the advantage, which certain individuals have over others of the same sex and species solely in respect of reproduction.” (http://infidels.org/library/historical/charles_darwin/descent_of_man/chapter_08.html) Two common types of sexual selection are male to male competition, and female choice. Male to male is when the males fight ‘win the right’ to reproduce with the females. Female choice is when the females choose the most formidable male to produce offspring with. (http://www.nyu.edu/projects/fitch/courses/evolution/html/sexual_selection.html) With female choice the males must find some way to be more ‘attractive’ to the females. The female looks for a favorable trait that shows sings of survival for her offspring to have. The female’s eggs are valuable so she must choose wisely. Since there is such a strong search for the strongest mate, the Sexual Selection leads to sexual dimorphism. Sexual Dimorphism is the different characterizes of an individual in a species. For example, the male northern cardinal is a bold red and the female is a very drab boring brownish color. If the male was a dull red and
…show more content…
In the middle of the tank there was a black line down the middle of the center panel that will show which side the female is closest to which means what male guppy she is most attracted too. During the test after every 30-seconds, whichever side the female guppy was on was recorded into the data. To ensure that the female guppy was not attracted to a particular side instead of the tail length, after every test, the male with the big tail that was originally on the right side was now on the left and the small tail male guppy also switched sides. There were five tests in this experiment. With three big tail and two small tail males on the
A similar phenomenon was explained in Emily Martin’s The Egg and the Sperm. She discusses how “Western science” explains reproduction in a culturally constructed fashion. The language used to describe gametes and other sexual organs ultimately depicts sperm as “active” and “strong” in contrast to the egg being “passive” and “dormant” (Martin 489-450). The language used by scientists to describe reproductive organs is not chosen to satisfy religious beliefs, but analogously the language represents stereotypical male-female roles. Both cases show how “biology itself is shaped by historical and material processes” (Roberts 115).
Even though this family's case only involved a choice of gender, it raised the issues of selection for other traits (Embryo Project Encyclopedia
Reproductive behaviour can fall under either Nature or Nurture
The New York Times recently published an article that proposed the reason the oldfield mouse is monogamous could be genetic. Scientists began looking at the behavior of the oldfield mouse because of its tendency to be monogamous and also for the males to be involved in the raising of the children. This is a unique behavior among mammals, as typically a male mammal will mate with as many females as possible. Additionally, the oldfield mouse will not mate with a deer mouse, unless they are in a laboratory environment and a deer mouse is the only reproductive option (Zimmer, 2017). Using this knowledge, scientists decide to look at the childrearing tendencies of the oldfield mouse and the deer mouse to determine a genetic explanation.
The answer to this question is biological processes of evolution. Without the barrier of gender in earlier developing societies one could not have possibly survived due to the nature of mating. Sex is what has kept the human race alive, and quite literally is an effective way to preserve an entire species. Reproduction is an evolved mechanism that has taken millions of years to master and nature has made it so that life can continue. With this
Variation in female mate choice can result in the form, direction, and intensity of sexual selection on males (Gillespie, Miller, et al. 2014). These fluctuations in selection may have important evolutionary implications, such as maintaining genetic variation in sexual selected traits (Gillespie, Miller, et al. 2014).
I believe that in having a belief in your biological nature of gender empowers you and also imposes a set understanding onto you. As result of believing in the biological nature of gender, you have the choice of whether or not you want to rebel against them or not, whereas if you were ignorant to them, perhaps you would naturally fall into your biological nature regardless. As Dr. Penner mentioned in lecture “As human beings we are unique, in that we can say yes and no to our instincts […] Saying no to instincts is often called: repression of our natural selves” (Penner, 2015). I believe that these biological impulses are performed through a critical self who is capable of deciding which urges to encourage and which to deny which is another example of repression of our natural selves.
These two types are not mutually exclusive; a species can display traits from both types. Polyandry can provide a species with better reproductive success, in the case of Salamandra salamandra, or insure against nest failure as studied in the Australian toadlet Pseudophryne bibronii, or increase the fitness of the offspring as studied in Chiromantis xerampelina. However, females can be forced into polyandrous mating by male harassment, as studied in Bufo bufo. Sexual
Dualism is the major focus of Anne Fausto-Sterling’s (2000) “Dueling Dualisms” with deep discussion on the dichotomy of “sex/gender, nature/nurture, and real/constructed.” However, her movement to the concept of intertwined biology and lived experience are insightful. I would like to look at how Fausto-Sterling describes and supports the idea of nature and nurture working together to create gender and sexuality. Fausto-Sterling (2000) stated “sexuality is a somatic fact created by a cultural effect,” meaning that there is truth to the biological form that creates the body and it still severs a function, but this biological body is altered through the environment. Fausto-Sterling (2000) suggested that the body and culture are always moving together to create individual lived experience and that one “cannot merely subtract the environment, culture, history and end up with nature to biology.”
Charles Darwin is one of the main contributors to racism through his theory of Evolution based on the notion of survival of the fittest through natural selection. Darwin believed that human races are divided into two groups; strong and weak. Then he developed a new theory which is survival for the fittest through natural selection. This theory states that only strong species are able to survive and have luxurious lives, while weak species are destroyed by natural laws. Social reformers used Darwinism to introduce various social policies.
Natural Selection is the long gradual process in which Biological traits either become more or less common in a population as a function of the effect of inherited traits on the differential reproductive success of organisms interacting with their environment. In Darwin’s work The Origin of Species he also mentioned evidence for the Theory of Evolution from his voyage around the world on The H.M.S. Beagle. The Origin of Species is probably the most influential work on evolutionary biology. The Origin of Species will help prove my thesis because it introduces the ideas that we base on evolutionary biology today.
E.g. People may think they are also confident, intelligent, strong, kind and sociable. This makes people behave positively towards attractive people. Male Strategies: • The chosen strategy of a male – quantity over quality. • Men tend to go for baby face features and small noses. • 0.70 hip to waist ratio (hour glass) is most attractive as it connects to fertility.
The second limitation for evolutionary theory emphasizes on the fact that, the stated theories of mating lack complexity and sophistication. It assumes matching or selection of mating partners takes place in a single process that lacks connectivity to other possible phenomenon that attraction may also be derived from (Buss & Schmitt,
It is a contentious issue that whether homosexuality is due to nurture or nature. . . This paper attempts to show that homosexuality is mainly due to nature. . There are few
Previously in-depth research has been done based on gender and sex differences but very few are based on the current evolutions. This essay will further look into the factors involved in differentiating sex and gender as well as further development of them. Three main factors are involved in