Whoever says science states facts isn’t saying the truth because science is always evolving and making new discoveries. Climate change is going to be a big concern, it’s going to cause a mass change in agriculture, the rising heat will affect farmers and how they grow crops. The burning toxic chemicals cannot lead to a positive outcome as well, it may rise health problems and create different types of dieses that’ll affect mankind. Science has its predictions, but how solid can these predictions be? “The Myth of ‘Settled Science.’” is an article written by Charles Krauthammer that addresses a different point of view on global warming. Krauthammer questions if what these scientists are saying is actually true or if it’s a way for them to manipulate the people. I agree with Krauthammer that not everything we are told about global warming is true, and that not everything can be blamed on global warming; however, I disagree that global warming is not happening. …show more content…
The lack of rain in California is causing a drought. Farms are being damaged and crops are dying. This change in weather might just be a phase or a heat wave or it might be something bigger. In an interview about what’s happening in California, Obama automatically blamed it on global warming. Krauthammer states that in a study on climate change it showed that California should get colder, not hotter. I agree with Krauthammer that we shouldn’t believe everything that we are told about global warming. I certainly believe global warming does exist, but I don’t believe that it’s the cause of the dryness in California due to what studies have
He pulls quotes from Benjamin Strauss, the vice president for Climate Central who has “a Ph.D. in ecology and evolutionary biology from Princeton”(Williamson 2) and Rob Painting, a “true believer who writes for Skeptical Science”(2) who is simply “a former police officer who is really, really interested in global warming” (3). While Strauss is more qualified to speak on behalf of the science behind climate change, the leading climatologists of the world are nowhere to be seen. Instead, Williamson uses these two, less credible, sources to drive his point of opposition further and more
A few months ago, strange, frigid weather was sweeping across the nation. Some places saw their first snowfall in eight years. Other cities ended up being colder than cities that were closer to the North Pole. Scientists believe that this is because of global warming. Some people don’t believe that this weird weather means that global warming is a serious thing: “Some question how it could be so cold if the planet is heating up.
But we have satellites keeping a close eye on the sun, and it has not changed nearly enough to be the culprit.” The strategy he goes with is taking the other side and immediately denies it with facts that benefits his point more than the opposing one. Although, Cynthia Tucker’s “Climate Change Looms More Terrifying Than Any Fiction” uses a bunch of stellar evidence, like “A 10-year-old boy visiting from Missouri with his family was killed in a freak accident on an Alabama beach in June when he was struck by a log that had been thrown ashore by a storm surge. ” There seems to be a lack of counter arguments that could’ve boosted her evidence even more and propel her work to greatness.
California dry from all of its water people trying to sell or just moving anywhere else. The drought has been going on for many years and slowly California is running out of water. If the government of California does not do anything the people may start to attack farmer to get water or the government may go for the people. The farmers are using all the water and people are losing their water.
This is not an effective because it is verifiable. A better way to phrase the statement to make it more argumentative is: What some people describe as global warming is actually nothing more than regular, cycles of climate change over time. 6. This is not an effective argument because it is verifiable. College is getting more and more expensive as the years pass and this could be verified by studies and research.
The cause of all this is the unregulated pumping of groundwater out of aquifers by California 's farmers in the Central Valley. As water is drawn out of these reservoirs, their structural integrity fails and they consequently collapse, causing the land above to sink. Once the aquifers collapse, their maximum capacity is reduced, so they cannot be fully refilled during wet periods. Less water will be stored and pumped, which is a major concern for drought years in the future.
I 'm not usually stunned by opinion regardless of how delusional the foundation of it is, but even the hardened polemist may wince at the vehement aimed at global warming skeptics / deniers. Debate is a wonderful thing if it is about interpretations surrounding water tight credible data; I crave for hard evidence - herewith, while seeking it the waters become murky and the rhetoric shifts onwards to comparisons you 'll never dream of... A war veteran 's letter illustrates this point with bells on. "Propaganda by global-warming skeptics and deniers remind me of 1944, when as an Army officer I saw living skeletons in striped pajamas. Horror stories about Nazi concentration camps suddenly rang true.
Environmental Impacts of the California Drought Introduction Over the last several hundred years, many scientists have proven that Climate change, or the other name, “Global Warming” that people think is politically incorrect, is a major problem in our future if we do not act to reverse its effects. One place around the world that has experienced these effects of this world issue is California. California has been in a major drought for several years now, and looks to continue for several years to come if nothing is done to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Dr. Marty Klein Recap: Legitimate scientific research is often discounted by politicos proclaiming that the issue is “controversial” even when there is a clear-cut consensus among recognized scientists. Consider the so-called debates about the harmful effects of tobacco or climate change, or how IUDs and emergency contraceptives work. Combined, those high-profile issues (and others--fluoride in city water, etc.) are often identified as issues of phony controversy--as they were in a National Geographic magazine cover story, “The War on Science” (March, 2015). For a good example of that ploy we also have Jeb Bush’s (a potential 2016 presidential candidate) comments about climate change. Bush said that “he wasn’t a scientist” but nevertheless he believes the “science” of human-caused climate change was “convoluted,” and questioned the degree to which carbon emissions are responsible.
Throughout the course of history, California reigns as one of the driest areas in the United States of America. Like many other places in the United States, California receives precipitation in the forms of rain and snow because of moisture from the Pacific Ocean, though, in smaller increments. Over the past four years, the amount of precipitation that California has received has consistently declined. In 2011, California’s governor, Jerry Brown, declared the state to be experiencing one of the most severe droughts on record. Four years later, the drought continues to wreak havoc on the state’s land, population, and wildlife.
With the heavy rainfall expected during the upcoming El Niño, the city of Los Angeles is at increased risk from effects, such as landslides, mudflows, and flooding. El Niño causes the water temperature to get warmer (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2015). It can also lead to heavy precipitation in some areas and drier weather in other areas (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2015). California has been in a drought for the past four years, but El Niño will not end the drought
In a tweet, he stated that the concept of climate change was a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese to make the United States manufacturing non-competitive. However, evidence from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shows evidence that the global temperature has increased 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit since
Global Warming True or False Many different people have many different perspectives on the subject of global warming. Some believe that is it is happening because of humans, some think that it is happening because of nature, and some believe that it is not happening at all and that the subject of global warming is just a huge massive lie to the world. Many people including myself believe that anthropogenic global warming is happening on the Earth. Scientists have shown that the Earth does have periods of heating and cooling throughout history, but they also have shown that since the beginning of the industrial revolution the temperature has gone up more than ever, as shown by figure 1 below. One article from the National Aeronautics and
According to a study of fox news viewership’s influence on global warming opinions, the more times per month an individual watched Fox news the less likely they are to believe global warming was caused by things that people do (Krosnick and MacInnis). Another study has shown that where liberal framing is generally ambivalent towards the usage of the terms “climate change” vs “global warming”, conservatives are more likely to refer to it as global warming than climate change (the Economist). This makes sense given that the term global warming implies that temperatures are rising, and thus places like the East coast and parts of the Midwest that have seen temperature decreases can be used as examples of the globe not
Earth is located within a special distance from the sun where it’s not close enough to scorch the earth; however, it’s in a unique place that allow it to take energy and warmth from the sun. Throughout the history of the Earth, the climate have been changing that in the last 650.000 years the atmospheric carbon dioxide had never been as high as it is now, which is mostly because of human civilization. During these changes, the earth has been harmed in several ways that experts have the evidence to show that it’s a serious issue to the world. Nevertheless, a lot of scientists proved that it has been changing and the world might have exceeded the tipping point. According to The Conversation,” It’s true: 97% of research papers say climate change