Author, Joyce Carol Oates, of Where are you Going, Where have you Been alludes to four particular historical references within the story. Each reference provides significance to the story’s context. When the story is read with an approach, the reader will then have a better understanding. It is argued that the myth Death of a Maiden, the crime narrative Charles Schmid, the 1960’s values of Bob Dylan, and Sigmund Freud’s philosophy of the dream sequence and the most important approach to the story. The story, which is described as a mystery and crime narrative, reflects the killing of Charles Schmid. A murder from Tuscan, Arizona, during the 1960’s, Oates bases her story off these killings. In this essay I will argue that the most eminent approach …show more content…
Schmid’s motive for murder was that he had always wanted to know what it felt like to kill. On May 31, 1964, Allen Rowe was raped, killed and buried in the desert. The detail of Arnold’s and Schmid’s crime are parallel. For example, both Connie and Alleen Rowe were 15 at the time of their assaults. Schmid was 21 when he killed Rowe, Arnold is seemingly older than Connie, “he wasn't a kid, he was much older- thirty, maybe more” (5). In addition, both the victims were alone at their home the night of their assaults. The night of Connie’s assault, was the first time her and Arnold had met. Seeking out Connie after Arnold had “put [his] sign in the air,” reflects how Schmid choose Rowe to be his first victim (5). Arnold’s strategy is to talk, first about music and the car, then he asks Connie if she “wanta go for a ride” (3). One the night Rowe was murdered, Rowe was asked the same question. In both cases, no force is necessary to kidnap the victim. Connie goes with Arnold under fear, she is under his control with just his words. Furthermore, the friend in Arnold’s car, Ellie, resembles Schmid’s girlfriend, who as the murder took place remained in the car listening to the radio. In addition, the criminal acts start in both cases when both the girls step into the men’s gold color cars. The rape of Rowe and Arnold’s intentions are parallel: “Yes I am your lover […] I’ll come inside you where its all secret and you'll give in to me and you'll love me” (6). The murder of Alleen Rowe corresponds with the assaults against Connie. It is the best to read the story with the approach of Charles Schmidt because the criminal acts reflect each other. Reading the story with this view will close the open ended ending, as we can assume that Connie will be murdered. Oates makes details throughout the story that both Schmid and Arnold had done in their cynical
“Killings”, Andre Dubus’ short story, revolves around a father who seeks vengeance against his son’s killer. The story is about the murders committed by Richard Strout and Matt Fowler in their attempt to get retribution and ease the pain in their hearts. The circle of killings is first caused by the murder of Matt Fowler’s son, Frank, by Richard, which leads to the retaliatory killing of Richard, by Matt. This infinite, unforgiving circle of killings and attempts at retribution is what Dubus portrays in a nonjudgmental view. The readers are left to see how the act of killing affects Richard and Matt and decide how much their retribution costs them.
Back in 1900 Hunter Randolf, a 46 year old murder who took about 7 girls, 3 boys and 1 adult, is serving three life sentences and death row. In Fall of 1969, in a small town called Ploriska ( plow-risk-uh ) where it was very known for disappearing people, most commonly kids. 17 years later a new thirsty murder’ is on the run ready to take the place of Hunter Randolf. Thirteen-year-old jannett was out on a school night with two friends, Cassie and London who were on their way home from the movies. They seperated into three directions but they all lived in the same neighbourhood so it wasnt so unsafe to walk alone.
While reading this novel, I made a connection to Andrea Freeman’s motives, I questioned Jeff Trammel’s secrecy, and predicted who really killed the banker. At first, I, the reader, and Mickey Haller were tentative about Andrea Freeman’s actions.
Elliot Rodger is the perpetrator of the Santa Barbra shooting that occurred on May 23, 2014. He uploaded a video outlining his reasonings for his violent actions. In this video he explained how he plans to get retribution for the years he suffered without a girlfriend. He highlighted how he was a nice guy and he did not know why women would not go out with him and how he planned to slaughter the women who rejected and refused to have sex with him all these years and how he planned to murder the men who have had sex with women. He justified his actions as pay back for being a part of the out group when it came to having access to women’s bodies.
This was evident when Connie's parents left her in charge of Kenneth and the house while they were gone on a night out on the town. No one knew that later that night Kenneth would end up shooting Connie's boyfriend after believing that he was “a prowler” (Dubus 457). Though this story's ending was unexpected, surprising, and confusing throughout the read I also felt an underlying feeling of wordiness. Our feelings toward a piece of work can make or break our experience.
“I went ahead and tied her up and then put a bag over her head and strangled her” the psychotic serial killer confessed on June 27th, 2005. Dennis Rader had been an unknown American serial killer for a couple decades. Each killer differs and has a unique story, however Dennis’s story is quite is special. He killed his victims in secrecy and while confessing he showed no signs of remorse for the murders of the humans in his community. Although he did not murder as many as other killers, Dennis Rader was the worst serial killer.
A horrible tragedy of three ruined lives, a brutally murdered 14 year old, and life imprisonments of two teenage killers (Linder, 1). Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, two extremely intelligent young men with a crazed affection for each other, shocked many people by the gruesomeness and the nature of the murder of Bobby Franks. In Chicago, 1924, the radio was just making an entrance into social life, cultural norms were changing as the economy boomed, and traditional views on life began to change to be more contemporary (History.com Staff). Leopold and Loeb were fearless, living the fast life of robbing and conning, when they decided to commit the perfect, unsolvable, murder. They had no want or even reason to kill, but to experience the thrill of adrenaline flow through them (Linder, 2).
we know from an assumption that Friend only killed Connie. Schmid however, had killed three other teenage girls before being caught by police. (A killer who can't keep his mouth
Researching serial killers and attempting to come up with reasons why they commit such brutal and outrageous crimes is difficult. One has to not only look back in to how the killer was brought up but the relationships they experienced throughout their lives and the factors which may have lead them to their crimes. Throughout this paper, a background of one of the most notorious serial killers in the U.S., Gary Ridgway will be analyzed. A look into his childhood will discover both psychological and sexual abuse brought on by his mother and father. Ridgway’s adolescent years were also filled with indicators of a teenager in need of help.
It is important to read “Where Are You Going,Where Have You Been?”,the story makes the people feel uncomfortable. Weird but true , the story makes the reader think and causes them to apply precaution along with the knowledge of what can happened in their own life .Which is probably why this short story is
“Invitation to a Murder” Essay As the author of “Invitation to a murder” portrays a suspenseful tone during the story, Josh Pachter creates many situational ironies throughout the story. The setting of the story is on the evening of December 16th, 1971, at Eleanor Madeline Abbot’s home. The short story begins when Chief Inspector Lawrence A. Branigan received a letter inviting him to the murder of Eleanor Madeline Abbot’s husband, Gregory Eliot Abbot. Branigan decided to go to the event. When Branigan Arrived at the event, he realized that there were eleven other men present.
Although Truman Capote attempts to illustrate the humanity in the murderers, Mr. Capote’s primary goal is to separate the two murderers’ characters; therefore, he claims, not all murders are equally as guilty. Mr. Capote humanizes the murderers, creating a sympathetic tone towards the killers. When the crime of murdering the Clutter family was committed, it did not just end the lives of the family, rather, Capote says that, “...four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives” (Capote 5). Through the use of a paradox, Capote demonstrates how the murderers are not shown as monsters, but rather humans.
[He] does not notice the police car… follow him.” This one event, mixed with the stereotype the protagonist has thrown upon him by the cop, seals his fate. All three of these situations foreshadow the ironic and deadly situation that the poor lost man is about to find himself involved. It is these subtle hints to his death that not only add suspense to the plot, but also hold a key importance in conflict development. W.D. Valgardson uses many great elements of fiction to build plot and conflict, as well as teach the lesson of not making snap judgments in his short story Identities.
Throughout the story, three major details of the narrator’s psyche are confirmed. First, we learned of the narrator’s deceitfulness. Every morning he lies to the old man with the least bit of guilt. The next continues to prove the madness as the narrator feels utter joy from the terror of another. Lastly, the narrator fabricates that the old man is simply not home to assure the officers.
Why Was Stenstrom on the Bus: The Reoccurring Question Ake Stenstrom was a young detective in Marin Beck’s homicide squad whom was brutally murdered during a bloodbath killing on a double-decker bus in Stockholm. Throughout the novel, a common and recurring question stated, “why was he on the bus?” which almost always seemed to lead to a dead end of conclusions. Within this paper, I will further go into detail of what his story was and how his colleagues of the Stockholm homicide squad reached their conclusion which ultimately answered the above question.