Assignment Four – The Family Group by Charles Umlauf
Charles Umlauf created The Family Group sculpture in 1960. The location of the sculpture is outside of the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin. Its green color distinguishes the sculpture from the many other sculptures around the university and from the background of the business school. Much of the evidence in the paper will come from the structure and form of the sculpture. The sculpture depicts the wife leaning on the husband showing a traditional family structure. Although the family dynamic will not play a large part of the paper, it is important to note the husband is placed as the dominant member of the family. Another important feature of the sculpture
…show more content…
When I first had a chance to sit and analyze the sculpture, I began with a clear understanding of what the piece meant and the explicit function it portrayed. However, the longer I viewed the sculpture the more the implicit purpose of the sculpture began to become visible. This final report will entail: the double purpose that the sculpture encompasses, the struggle between the two and my personal reflection on the assignment.
The first purpose that will be examined is the explicit purpose of The Family Group that is based on the context of the sculpture, the text on the sculpture and the background of Charles Umlauf. The sculpture clearly outlines its purpose by stating, “The family is the foundation upon which the world of business is built, and it is a vital force in the local, state, and national economy." Although the purpose is stated on the sculpture, there are contributing factors that support the claim Umlauf presents. The placement of it in front of McCombs presents a clear purpose, relating the work of the institution in furthering the economy to the foundation of the economy the school is advancing. At
…show more content…
Art was meant to be looked at and the work was delegated to the art piece to make an impression in your mind in the short time you were together. However, this assignment allowed to me realize that it is not the art’s duty to engage but the viewers want to be engaged. Staring at a piece of art, not analyzing for a short time period would not give the art or you a meaningful amount of time to make an impact. To make an impression, the art piece must be understood and that only comes with spending time with the art. Another observation I made was that no sculpture is ever complete being looked at. I have spent three hours with The Family Group yet only have I explored the author’s purpose deeply. There are so many facets of an artwork that are yet unexplored. Some questions that still ponder my mind following the complete viewing of the sculpture are: What significance does the color green for Umlauf? Why create the sculpture out of bronze? These questions fall more under the physical realm of the sculpture and will continue to be looked at after this final report is completed. One final takeaway I believed I have learned and continuing to learn is about the struggle between the viewer and the art piece. I never understood what Professor Peers described at the beginning of the year when mentioning how the artwork “pushes back” however, now I understand. The unwillingness of the art piece to
Assignment C There is much more to art than what one sees at first glance. In the last two weeks reading assignments I have learned that there is much more to art than nicely arranging colors and shapes to create a scene for someone to enjoy. Not only in the color important but the intensity, position, size, direction, pattern, and texture all add to the experience of studying art. I had known of these concepts before but know have a much more profound understanding of them that will allow me to but understand and interept ideas that an artist is trying to portray in his piece.
The illustration depicts a tattoo “artist” “disfiguring” the iconic “The Thinker” sculpture. To convey his stance, Lobbecke’s exaggerates the tattoo “artist’s” eyes and ears to make almost unhuman. These characteristics suggest to the audience that the “artist” is not of sound mind and positons to regard all people with tattoos in the same manner. To also further this generalised idea, Lobbecke’s has also drawn the “artist” in ill fitting and inappropriate clothing. Also, the use of irrelevant tribal style tattoos on the French sculpture subtly suggest to the audience that tattoos have no purposeful meaning and are culturally insensitive therefore the same can be said for their wearers.
and The Blue Woman in a Black Chair sculptures have demonstrate the various expressions sculptors can evoke. Through the usage of an approachable, engraved pedestal, the built bronze color and detailed outer aesthetics, Ana Koh-Varilla and Jeffrey Varilla convey the dynamic message of the profound ideas Mr. King presented decades ago and the eternal impact those compelling principles will have for decades to come. Segal, on the other hand strays away from an idealistic approach for exchange of expressing the realistic behaviors of life. Through the placement of the drapery, the tranquil blue color, and ambiguous form of the quiet figure, Segal highlights the relatable sedentary behavior of slouching, inwardly focusing on one’s self and one’s thoughts. In a quiet setting like the Blanton, Segal’s sculpture resonates with many individuals, however his art work was placed in an outside setting, there would be a barrier in embracing and fully connecting with the sculpture at
The dramatic transformation represents their self-sufficient attitude and strong determined attitude they enforced on their children, yet were unable to follow themselves. “That was why we had to find gold. To get Mom a new wedding ring. That and so we could build the Glass Castle” (Walls 31).
This provides scholars an insight to the importance placed on the statue. Routinely cleaned, every occasion on which this is done shows a continuation of the important cultural connotations, renewed with each shine, for centuries. Many scholars assert that to add or restore an art piece takes away from the artist’s original message, while still others argue the opposite (Mazzoni 2010: 36). For example, the Renaissance inclusion of Romulus and Remus may have detracted from the earliest meaning, but it does add new and enhanced cultural pride, and now more than ever it depicts the city’s famous founding myth. Clearly these additions have increased their visual appeal, as the lupa not only still stands today, but subsists in the form of logos for events and teams, portrayals in film, and novels (Mazzoni 2010: 79).
Eva Mastrocola Mrs. Adams AP Language and Composition 13 January 2023 Appeals and Ideals and of American Family Culture In the past decade or so, classical family life in modern America has transformed from an ideal to a debate. With a growing rate for divorces, remarriage, and cohabitation, many question the relevance and benefit of bearing children. However, family is vital to the sustainability of a society, and while its traditional concept has diversified and expanded in recent years, the appeal of such remains constant. The function of a family is to fulfill the natural and societal desire to procreate, considering the influence of commercialization, and the values that raising a child instills.
74-89. The analysis of the symbols and other interesting aspects of the painting are helpfully explained in this book. Moreover, it explains how both sides of the landscape do not line up, which
Artwork is a form of self-expression from an artist based on life experience, or on something that the artist feels strongly about (Berenson, 87). The product of art can help others with similar experiences but not able to express the same feeling themselves. From the product of art, people can start drawing excitement, purpose as well as encouragement about the real thing being expressed. Through a piece of art, the artist can communicate a purpose, an emotion or an idea in their work. In this research paper, I compare two pieces of artwork; Madonna and child with the saints by Giovanni Bellini and Madonna and child with the two angels done by Fra Filippo Lippi.
Her stance is in contrapposto – one leg forward, one shoulder back. The most noticeable is the triangular shape of the robe. This robe also divides the composition into two, from her hair and right hand down one third of the sculpture towards her left side makes Geraert’s use of the rule of thirds apparent. These lines and the structure of the sculpture’s front bring viewers’ attention from her foot on the bottom up through the robe to the crowded area of the child’s feet, up to her hair and face and thus down to the child’s arm down to his
Family structure talks about family arrangement and composition which includes the roles and interactions (Edelman, 2014). According to Minuchin (2012), the family structural theory emphasis on the important of the family structure and its changes that occurs and how the individuals in the family relate collectively over time to put up and accept each other. Minuchin says further that a well-functioning family will choose how to solve and handle the family experience with a positive outcome. The goal of a structural family is to express the strengths in each other in critical moments, and helping each other through it. Developmental theory is the methods used as the viewpoint of family tasking and development through phases of life (Edelman, 2014).
Thousands of paintings and sculptures were made in these periods of time. In this essay, I will imagine myself being a curator of an art gallery that has a Greek room, a Roman room, an Early Christian room, a Gothic room, a Renaissance room, and a Baroque room. I will select two pieces for each room and discuss why I would put those paintings and sculptures in each room at the gallery. I will explain two pieces that I would place in the Greek room at the gallery. The first piece is a painting called "Amphora".
Charles Umlauf worked as an art professor at The University of Texas at Austin. By working at the University, Umlauf had a bias towards the placement of the sculpture. The Family Group is a lesser-known piece of the sculptor opposed to the dozens of pieces made by Umlauf placed in the UMLAUF Sculpture Garden & Museum. Because of Umlauf’s close relationship with the University alienated The Family Group from the garden and placed it in front of McCombs. The exceptional teaching of Charles Umlauf with his generous donation of the sculptor allowed him to retire as an art professor
This piece is important because it is exceptional compared to well-known artists. It has an philosophical interpretation that can relate to viewers’ lives. It is visually unusual compared to other art because it does not have a specific subject, and the crypticness is fascinating because it has viewers thinking deeply about its meaning as they begin to understand the visuals. It is a substantial piece of art because if one is having a difficult time in life, one can glance at The Deep and feel a sense of comfort of not feeling
This caused me to mentally retract from the “regular world” which was drowned out by an increasing focus on the art pieces themselves as they came to life in the center of my focus. For me, the dynamic and multidimensional nature of kinetic art makes it easier to lose myself in the appreciation of the
This research was carried out not to only show awareness toward the society but also why people should take art seriously. Often times, we can see lots of people debating whether art is important or not. This happened because the lack of exposure and knowledge that has been taught to them. Art can help to shape the society and affect the society to broaden their view of perspective in life by referring on the artworks because each work of art can give different meanings to life.