In the journal, the writer explain that feminism is critique international human rights and fight for women rights while the cultural relativism critique the International Human Rights and fight for the culture. I do agree that in practice International Human rights is not universal especially for women since there is a lot of discrimination towards women. But I am not fully agreed with the writer, that state feminism can cooperate with cultural relativism. If the feminism could cooperate together since there are several things that could not be combine such as human right and culture. For example is the Female Genital Mutilation that known as the culture in some region but it was violating the women rights.
And that notion contradicts completely with the idea of feminism in the international relations. Feminism sees the condition that the world is creating a patriarchal hegemony, a hegemon that heavily biases for the advantage of men, and undermining the role and value of women, and with the progress of civilization, the conditions for women does not reflect as such anymore, that for the better establishment of the society, women needs to be involved in the process for decision making and policy making, and equal chances must be given for women to be involved in the decisions that would affect themselves, rather than men deciding it for women. Feminists see the world needs to be deconstructed for the inclusions of women and better conditions in the society regarding
However just because men and women are different does not mean that one is better than the other, in fact the existence of humanity depends on these differences. And these differences are what we call complementary and they are part of the design of humanity. I am against feminism because I believe that equality and fair treatment should not be gender specific. And I don’t need feminism because I am just as strong and equally important as my male counterparts. I don’t need to constantly point out the fact that I’m female to make a point in
It is also a prerequisite for developing effective strategies to liberate women and identifies the underlying causes of women’s subordination. Dr. Rosemarie Tong a distinguished Professor of Health Care Ethics in the Department of Philosophy, suggests that feminist theory attempts to describe women’s oppression, to explain its causes and consequences, and to prescribe strategies for women’s liberation. In “Women Do Theory,” Jane Flax, a professor in the department of political science, suggests that theory is a systematic, analytic approach to everyday experience. Flax argues that everybody does this unconsciously and that to theorize is to bring this unconscious process to a conscious level so that it can be developed and refined. According to Flax, feminist theory seeks to understand the power differential between men and women, seeks to understand women’s oppression—how it evolved, how it changes over time, how it is related to other forms of oppression and how to overcome these oppressions.
To what extent is feminism supported and/or criticised in Australian contemporary society, and what do you think might explain this? Feminism is a movement seeking equality in society for all men, women and transgender people. Many feminist movements focus on eliminating the oppression of women as well as pushing for women's rights and interests. Feminism has been through a number of waves, the first wave demanded women have the right to vote (week5 text). Feminism is now said to be entering its forth wave.
Feminism is considered both a scholarly obligation and a political movement that looks for justice for women and the conclusion of sexism in all manners. Nonetheless, there are several diverse types of feminism. Feminists do not share the same sentiments about what sexism comprises and what really ought to be carried out about it: they are at loggerheads when it comes to the significance of being a woman or a man and what political and social shortcomings gender has or ought to have. However, encouraged by the query for social justice, feminist query makes available an array of perspectives on cultural, economic, social, and political phenomena. Imperative topics for the theory of feminist and politics include the body, work, class, the family,
Thus, feminism sought to liberate women from androcentrism, which was prevalent in multiple aspects of life, including religion. Women’s views were not expressed in religion and theology, therefore, feminist theologians attempted to reinterpret religion based on the female experience. Feminist theologies can be divided into three categories, revolutionary, reformist and reconstructionist. The first, revolutionary feminist theology, views the bible and Christianity as patriarchal and antiwoman. Thus, women abandoned Christianity and looked to worshipping ancient female deities.
Explain Feminism In International Relations. The word Feminism usually alludes to the women. According to Kieth L. Shimko in Perspectives, Theories and Readings in International Relations, he defines feminism as a perspective on social phenomena that focus on the issues concerned to the women while theoretically highlighted on the significance of gender. The main idea of feminist basically is about gender and patriarchy. This idea reflected on gender is not the same as sex, but the complex social construction of men’s and women’s identities and behaviour in relation to each other.
Apart from the two main theories of realism and liberalism, the feminist theory brings new perspectives to the international relations table. If majority of head of states were women ,there will be differences in international relations. Women’s totality differs from that of men. Behaviours and attitudes
Therefore it can be surmised that feminism in IR is meant to reveal the existing masculine predispositions embedded in traditional IR theories and recreate an unbiased gender stance in IR. But have feminist made a breakthrough in the field of International Relations or is the field still dominated by ‘hegemonic masculinity’ ? The following paper will discuss the ontological and epistemological agendas of feminism as well as the methodology used to support their claims. It will also assess their major contributions to the field of International Relations, including some of its cognate disciplines; and conclude by critically assessing its impact and value in International Relations. Feminism may be described as fissiparous in nature due to the varied strands in the discipline.