ipl-logo

Cherokee To Indian Territory Analysis

787 Words4 Pages

“There is a battle of two wolves inside us all. One is evil. It is anger, jealousy, greed, resentment, lies, inferiority and ego. The other is good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, humility, kindness, empathy and truth. The wolf that wins? The one you feed. - Cherokee Proverb”. The Cherokee had originally lived in Georgia before the Americans decided they wanted that land. The Cherokee signed a treaty, called the Indian Removal Act, agreeing to move out of Georgia into Indian Territory, but after signing the treaty, the Cherokee decided to rebel against it and they started to harm Americans because they wanted the Georgia land. The Americans offered the Cherokee almost everything they owned, millions of dollars, a lot of land, and a good place to move to. But the Cherokee still didn’t agree. The Cherokee should be moved off of the Georgia land because they would still have to live their way of living, they killed many Americans, and they …show more content…

According to the article, “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory”, it says, “ It is estimated that there are no more than 50,000 Indians in the southwest, which represents more than one square mile per person”. That is a lot of land for the Indians. Technically, each person could get one square mile of land for themselves. Also, the same article states that, “Not only were they given the land in Indian Territory for free, but they were also given $5 million.” The Americans were offering so much for the Indians, but none of them were grateful enough to accept it. Although the Indians are going to lose a lot of land and money moving, they will be getting more back in return than what they had previously. They just didn’t really realized the good effects about moving to another state. In general, the Americans were offering so much to the Indians, I don’t know why they wouldn’t want to turn that

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Indian Constitution And Cherokee Constitution

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    Being one of the more “advanced” tribes, the Cherokee thought early about making sure they could do everything possible to create preventative measures against having their land taken away. Before there was a more serious federal discussion on removing the tribe, they were working hard to becoming a more “civilized” group of people to become more accepted by regular Americans and to better themselves. In order to both help their case and further the process of becoming civilized, they set up a constitution which closely resembled that of the US Constitution. In the Cherokee Constitution, it allowed them to set up an actual border around their territory and set up a government, both which were signs of earlier resistance against their removal

    Read More

  • Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

    413 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

    Read More

  • Chief Tecumseh's Speech

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    While some americans may agree with tecumseh, many others would maintain their belief that the natives were not entitled to land because of their savagery. Yet, by paralleling land to

    Read More

  • Cherokee Pros And Cons

    681 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1828, Georgia passed a string of laws that violated the rights of the Cherokee people. One of the law passed by the state of Georgia also allowed the removal of the Cherokee from their own land After the settlers that were after the natives land had been burn and destroying houses and towns, and trespassing among other things, with the support of the state government the Cherokee’s brought a case to the supreme court. The treaties negotiated between Georgia and the Cherokee were negotiated as the Cherokee as an Independent Nation, this guaranteed the independence of both the land and the people of the Cherokee Nations. Cherokee tried negotiating with congress and Andrew Jackson, both of which failed. The Cherokee Nation, represented by John Ross who was the principal chief of the Cherokee’s, then filed for an Injunction at the Supreme Court against Georgia repeal the unfair laws.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Native Resistance Towards US Government And Settlers

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    Native Resistance Towards U.S. Government and Settlers Tecumseh was a Shawnee leader who believed that the Native American way of life should continue to thrive and flourish. The Cherokee are a Native American tribe that was subjected to assimilation of American culture by Christian missionaries and the dwindling of their claimed land. Both tribes had land that was encroached upon by United States government and settlers, but each tribe reacted to this encroachment in different ways. Certain strategies of each tribe were effective while others caused great losses for the Native Americans. Tecumseh and the Shawnee tribe desired unity between all tribes because a united front would be stronger when battling against the U.S. for “the land which

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Change America

    634 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jackson was wanting to change Washington and America. He done that very fast. The very first major piece of legislation, Jackson had recommended and got passed, was the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This act forced Jackson to prevent all the Indian tribes to live East of the Mississippi River. There were five Indian nations that were highly effected.

    Read More

  • Objections To Cherokee Settlers

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Cherokee had several major objections to moving to new locations. The Cherokee wanted to stay instead of moving to a place such as Arkansas because it is “unknown” to them and is already occupied by the Indians. Therefore, the Indians would look at the Cherokee as if they did not belong or be seen as an enemy when the Cherokee meant no harm. Also the Indians were not really supplied by wood and water, which was bad for the Indians because they could not live as agriculturalists, but also bad for the Cherokee because they were worried there was not a lot of land for farming. Furthermore, the Cherokee had major objections because the people around the Cherokees were so different compared to them.

    Read More

  • How Did Indian Nations Resist Removal

    821 Words  | 4 Pages

    The remaining Cherokee Indians were surrounded by the mast increasing majority of the whites. With the increasing of the white the population, the Cherokee were forced to adapt to the white man’s world and their way of life to blend in for survival. They created their own government, they became farmers, blacksmiths, carpenters, masons, owners of property. The Cherokees nation resisted removal using political means by publishing newspaper through the pressing press and protesting to the federal government; addressing memorial to the nation; a public plea for justice resulting in Georgia passing a law making it a crime for a white person to stay in Indian territory without taking an oath to the state of Georgia. The Cherokee Indians went through lawful and political means of resistance to avoid removal but it was ignored and their land was put on sale, property taken, and treaty created; still the Cherokee followed a policy of

    Read More

  • How The Devastating Effects Of The Trail Of Tears

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even the soldiers escorting them felt bad for them, but they had to follow orders. Native Americans had long lived in settlements stretching from Georgia to Mississippi. However, President Jackson and other political leaders wanted to open this land to settlement by American farmers. Under pressure from Jackson, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. Congress then established Indian Territory (land in what is now Oklahoma) and planned to move Native Americans there.

    Read More

  • Cherokee Pros And Cons

    1733 Words  | 7 Pages

    The removal of the Cherokee, or more commonly known as the “Trail of Tears,” was a defining American event that left an incredible historical impact. The Cherokee and other Native American tribes were being moved westward by the American government for various reasons such as disputes with white settlers, the desire for the gold on the Cherokee lands, the desire to civilize them and other reasons. However, it was far from a simplistic dispute between whites and Native Americans. There were many whites, including President Jackson, as well as some Cherokee, who supported the policy to move the Indians west. Opponents of the removal also included both whites and Cherokee.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was said to be a divergent president in many ways, especially for his unique background compared to the wealthy ones of the previous presidents. He started off as an orphan and made his way up to becoming a general in the military, then became a frontier and started working in office soon later. Jackson’s presidency was held during an age known as the Age of the Common Man where he was determined to always do what was best for the common people and protect them from the powers of the rich and the privileged. With his success as a populist in his own Jacksonian Democracy, Jackson was able to seduce the American people but frighten the political and economic elite. Although Jackson had good intentions with what he wanted to accomplish

    Read More

  • Was The Indian Removal Is Wrong Essay

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court even allowed them to stay, but the new settlers still wanted them out. The Indian Removal isn’t justified and the Indians should have stayed in Georgia because it was their own land, staying would help their health, and only a few signed the treaty. The land was the Cherokees’ to begin with. They had built their own society, and built all their living huts and all their homes.

    Read More

  • Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the letter, the Cherokee nation addresses several reason on why they should not have to move. One reason is that the new land if foreign to them. They are being expected to pack up, leave everything they know, and move to the unknown. Another reason to add on to the above is that there are other Native American tribe already

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Spoil System

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The white people wanted Native land after discovering gold in the mountains. Andrew Jackson declared that the move would be benefitting for all people, as the would be less conflict. The Cherokee believed the land was really theirs, and therefore had a right to continue living there. John Ross, chief of the Cherokee, brought the case to the Supreme court, where it was ruled in the favor of the Cherokee. However, Jackson went against the court’s ruling and decided to move them anyway.

    Read More

More about Cherokee To Indian Territory Analysis

Open Document