Intercountry adoption is recognized as one of a range of alternative care options available for children in need of care and protection at the international level. There are several international legal instruments that have been introduced to facilitate the practice of intercountry adoption around the world. This chapter will focus on two main international legal instruments on intercountry adoption which are the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Hague Convention of 1993) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the UNCRC). The discussion also includes the The Implementation and Operation of …show more content…
In regards to the sending state, it is responsible to establish the adoptability of the child. The competent authorities of the sending state should determine the child’s adoptability based on the criteria of the applicable law as well as psycho-social and cultural factors. For instance, it should be made clear that certain procedures must be fulfilled such as determination of abandonment or evidence of permanency planning. Hence, the child’s background should be investigated in the abandonment and orphans cases with every effort made to search for the families or relatives and to effect a reunification with no unduly delay should occur. The determination allows the child to be placed in other substitute care including intercountry adoption after realizing that he or she can no longer remain with the birth family. Intercountry adoption must be made in the best interests of the child after applying the principle of subsidiarity. The subsidiarity principle seems to suggest that intercountry adoption should not be employed unless the birth parents can no longer look after the child and there is no other suitable family care in the birth country. Further, the persons, institutions and authorities whose consent is to be relinquished have been counselled appropriately and …show more content…
Governmental body acting as a central authority already exists in many states to handle matters with regard to intercountry adoption while in other states, as such may be designated through an existing Ministry’s service or division. More than one central authority can also be appointed by the states with more than one system of law or states having independent territorial units. If there is more than one central authority has been appointed by the state, one dedicated central authority in charge for communication should be then designated. The designation of central authorities in both sending and receiving states seems to suggest that all matters pertaining to intercountry adoption would be managed by one dedicated organization ensuring better communication between the two contracting
Canada upholds that the best interests of the child are central to the decision making process on humanitarian and compassionate applications. “[T]he rights, interests, and needs of children and special attention to childhood are important clauses that should be considered in reasonably interpreting the “humanitarian” and “compassionate” considerations that guide the exercise of discretion” (Baker v. Canada, 1999, para. 73). The Court upholds that for a decision on an H&C application to be reasonable it “requires close attention to the interests and needs of the children. Children’s rights and attention to their interests, are central humanitarian and compassionate values in Canadian society.” (Baker v. Canada, 1999, para.
Introduction “Maybe these babies grew in the wrong stomachs, but now they have found the right parents” (Evans, 2008, pg. 159). Transracial adoption is the adoption of a child of one race by a parent or parents of a different race (Baden et al., 2012). This occurs both domestically (inter-country) and internationally (Ung et al., 2012). The history of international adoption stems from the Korean War (1950-1953)
Officials knew that placing out was imperfect and did what they could to screen inappropriate families. Despite problems, the system provided the best chance for many children”. (Warren, 1998) The children who were not adopted in one state would travel on the train to the next state in hopes of being adopted by a loving family to care for them. In some cases, the match was made ahead of time, and the couple would present a number to the chaperones who would match the number to the child wearing the same number.
Ralph Flynn is a California man who has recently filed a lawsuit against his parents for using him as a sex slave after adopting him at nine years old from a Russian orphanage. Ralph and Carolyn have been arrested for several months and their trial will shed light on the many abuses faced by Ralph during his childhood and teenage years. Adoption is a very selective process but international adoption may be less so. Every parent in the United States seeking to adopt a child must go through many tests and surveys before being approved as financially, mentally, and physically fit to adopt a young child; this process is to ensure that every adopted child has a good home. However, this process and its extreme rigor may change due to the relevance of this crime.
Having a parent who was adopted, and not being able to open their file leaves their children feeling empty. I grew up not knowing the other half of me and not knowing what cultures I could be a part of. Children who have a parent or parents that went through closed adoption process feel confused with their roots, lack medical history of potential diseases, and feel a loss of ethnic identity. My father went through a closed adoption when he was a baby. His adopted parents adopted him, for the thought of receiving money only to receive nothing.
There are currently 800 children being held in mandatory closed immigration detention, as Australia is the only country in the world which detains asylum-seeking children as a first option (Triggs, 2014). Australia’s system of mandatory immigration detention was introduced to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in 1992, and requires all non-citizen children who arrive without a valid visa to be detained (Triggs, 2014). Although the introduction of these requirements into the Migration Act were enforced to ensure the effective control and management of Australia’s borders (Phillips & Spinks, 2013), the mandatory and prolonged immigration detention of children is in clear violation of Article 3(1), Article 24(1) and Article 37(b) of the Convention
Interracial Adoption & Why Race Should Not Be an Overriding Factor The process of adoption was legalized in the United States in the 1850s, and over the past 150 years since then, the institution has drastically changed with our society(Fogle). One of these changes being the growing concern of interracial adoption. The conversation about whether or not race should be a determining factor in adoption first surfaced in 1972, when the concern for children being placed in a household with adoptive parents of a different race was first introduced at the national conference of the North American Council on Adoptable Children (Liem).
Dating back to the 1930's this has been a major issue due to the increase of future adoptive parents interested in adopting from a foreign country. Stating both sides of the controversy, main ideas shared and how they both have valuable points. Supporters explain how kids deserve a healthy lifestyle, hope for a better future and have proof of the bad condition these orphanages are in which are not suitable for children. On the other hand, opponents argue about the dangers of international adoption and how it plays a big part in child trafficking and minor exploitation. Critics also talk about the quality of life, but this time referring to culture, and lastly they touch on the fact that there are so very many kids waiting to be adopted in the U.S.
Tie to the audience: Some of the children that are in foster care might be related to you or the child could be someone that you know like a friend’s child. C. Thesis and Preview: Consequently, we need to do something to make adoption easier and better not only in the United States, but all over the world. Today I will give you a few solutions to fix the foster care system. I’ll begin by telling you about the need to improve foster care. II.
McKeen (2006) explains that the framework of the current child welfare approaches was directed from the dominant discourse of ‘national children’s agenda’ initiatives. Since then, there have been many major changes happened in the mainstream social policy in child welfare sector. The national and global political influences and world economic pressure forces federal and provincial governments to control the social security and welfare programs and it reflects in child welfare system too (McKeen, 2006). Politics in Canada has a serious notion on key ideologies while restructuring child welfare policies (McKeen, 2006). Ontario’s Child and Family service Act 1984, was developed on the principle of minimal family intervention with a view that children need to be protected in their own homes (Dumbrill, 2006b).
Transracial Adoption: A look into Black, White, & Right. Transracial adoption has become a very compelling and interesting topic over the past century. Transracial adoption is defined as the adoption of children of one race or culture to parent(s) of another race or culture. Transracial adoption started around the 1960’s after World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam war ended leaving many children abandoned and homeless resulting in a vast increase in the number of available children for adoption. (Hollingsworth, 1998; Silverman, 1993).
Adoption is a way for children who cannot be cared for by their birth parents to become members of another family. In most countries,, children are raised by one or both parents. sometimes both parents cannot provide the love and care their child's needs. “The parents may be young and not prepare or financially-to
Transracial adoption (TRA) occurs when the parents and their adopted child are of different races. TRA has been a controversial issue as it is said to affect the child’s racial identity formation and development. Most TRA studies are done in the United States of America (USA) where there is an increasing trend of TRAs. The demand by Caucasian couples for babies is increasing but the babies available for adoption mainly come from African-American or Asian families. In the USA, from 1999 to 2013, the total number children adopted from China and South Korea is 91,002, comprising roughly 36% of the adoptions (Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. State Department, 2013).
Institutionalisation can also severely affect a child’s development, but this can sometimes be recovered when the child is adopted. The child’s physical features like height, weight and head circumference can suffer during this time. Also, cognitively a child’s IQ can be off a normal range if adopted around their 3rd birthday but when it comes to school performance the cognitive performance can lag cognitive competence. Also, when it comes to emotional development, a study of Romanian adoptees demonstrated that attachment was affected if the child wasn’t adopted before they were 12 months old compared to secure attachments likely to be achieved before then, but babies adopted under 6 months showed normal attachment patterns during early childhood.
Single parent adoption can result in several benefits for both the adopter and the adopted. A. The benefits of the adoption procedure by single parents on the abandoned children. 1. The welfares of adoption can be touched by a uncountable number of individuals all over the world, as approximately everybody has been affected by adoption in some kind of way. Neighbors, friends, families– not only a family is formed but also the young abandoned individual will have a Life secured for him and will be able to live with people that picked to cherish and love them.