1. What is the difference between class and caste?
The difference between class and caste becomes prominently evident while reading about social inequality of China and India. In contrast to the caste system of India was the class system of China. In India, social hierarchy was referred to as the caste system, which is defined as “race” or “purity of blood.” This type of social hierarchy was meant to restrain social mobility and was associated with a certain color, part of the body of god Purusha, and certain duties. The class system of China was developed based off of a person’s wealth or value to the society. For example, in China the highest class was that of the officials or “scholar-gentry” who were educated peoples and were potential
…show more content…
This also contrasted from the caste system of India who defined their social groups much more strictly either by “purity of blood” (Varna) or by occupation (Jati). Another great difference from the class system of China and the caste system of India was social mobility. In China, people were able to move up the class system by becoming wealthy and/or the purchase of extensive property. This was very different from that caste system of India in the case that they people of a certain class could not move from class to class because the Hindu god Purusha had made the caste system eternal. Rarely did the people of India gain enough land or wealth to progress toward a higher class. Similarly, India’s caste system exploited the poor, whereas China’s class system respected the peasant class and had more respect for the poor than the caste system of India did. Another difference between class and caste was that the caste system was more localized and religious (Hinduism) whereas the class system of China was recognizable and similar throughout the entire state. Another dissimilarity was that China’s class system was based on social order, merit, and wealth where as the Indian caste system was more religious pulling …show more content…
For example, in China, emphasis on Confucian teachings formed the basis of the imperial academy in which wealthy students would study to become potential officials. These potential officials made up the high class or class of political officials. Also implementing Confucian teaching into his ruling was ruler Wang Mang who saw the peasant farmers as the important backbone to Chinese society. In China, rebellious acts of the peasants in 184 C.E. during the Yellow Turban Rebellion, united under a form of Daoism. Another second-wave civilization that used religious, philosophical, or cultural ideas to legitimate the class and/or gender inequalities was the Indians. In the Varna caste system of India, the four castes: Brahmins, Kshatriya, Vaisya, and the Sudras, were formed from the body of Hindu god, Purusha and were declared eternal. This meant that none of the people in any of the different castes could move from caste to caste and once born into that caste, you stayed there forever. The Indian caste system also had the Brahmins, or priests, become the highest part of their caste system because they believed that these priests performed rituals to ensure peace of the world. Also, the inequality of the castes in India incorporated the ideas or karma, dharma, and rebirth which were ideas pulled from
For a society to run, there should be a proper balance in every other step and to maintain that there had to be certain classes which executed their activities as per the need of the society. So, it was totally fine to have the different level of classes. There are laws which would not let poor be affected easily unless they are the culprit and they would be compensated with money if they are not found guilty. It sounds even as each group was best represented in their own way.
India put a caste system into effect, judging the appropriate social status of an individual based on their skin tone and familial background. Similar to India, China also set a class system in place, but their version relied on the literacy and intellect of an individual to determine their role in the society. Unfortunately, these class systems did not always please the ones who were on the lower end of the social spectrum and this discontent eventually led to internal strife, weakening the society as a whole. Due to the poor conditions the lower tier were kept at they soon lost love for the government and began to revolt, believing a new government would give them more favorable social
Classical India vs Classical China In China and India , they were different in ways like how they thought a government should control a civilization. China was isolated and when constructing the ideals of their government they were practically blind unlike India they had ideas to build upon. The development of political ideas had some similarities such as how religion had great influence on political views.
The Qin and Han dynasty had the same social classes due to confucianism. It can be described as a sophisticated and vague for each class. It was a 4 tiered system that consists of Emperor/Government, Peasants, Artisans and Merchants (Higher class to lower class). The Emperor was the head of the whole pyramid, no one could address him, nor the empress by their first name or they would face punishment.
Culture is a human phenomenon that is infinitely changing, evolving and being added upon. In East Asia, culture changed and stayed the same whether it be from contact with external forces such as foreign civilizations or changes in societal beliefs. This was never more evidently displayed than in China, which had many continuities and changes of its culture from 220 BCE to 1368 CE. From the beginning of 220 BCE to 1378 CE, Chinese culture changed in its outlook on certain classes and types of people. However, it stayed the same in its outlook of themselves and their own superiority.
The caste system holds the view that a person's caste influences their decision-making regarding marriage, employment, education, etc. Despite the fact that it is still in use today, the caste system underwent some major changes over time in India. In today’s time, according to Pew Research center they stated how in India, caste segregation is still widely practiced. For instance, a huge percentage of Brahmins said they would not accept a member of a scheduled caste as a neighbor. However, the majority of Indians believe that caste discrimination is not a major issue in the nation, and two-thirds of those who identify with scheduled castes or tribes also believe that their specific groups don't face a lot of prejudice.
Since the beginning of early civilization, man had hunted what they needed, fought each other for food and were self-reliant. Then, it all started in the Indus Valley Civilization around 3000 B.C. when man started having the idea of exchanging items with each other. The Chinese were the first people to have one person to lead them and be alongside people. These leaders enforced justice, were wealthy and elite. During China’s first Dynasty, the Xia Dynasty, around 16th Century B.C, when farmers wanted to be united and not fight with each other for their produce, they reached out to wealthier people who owned gold and silver and asked them to be their “leader”.
Class is a social system of hierarchy based on economic wealth. Joseph O. Jewell, author of Race, Social Reform, and the Making of a Middle Class: The American Missionary Association and Black Atlanta, 1870-1900, explains class as to “exist in large part as cultures-shared set of rules, ideologies, or
The separation between high, middle and low classes of people that has occurred has been caused by the classist beliefs of people belonging to each social caste. Firstly, Aunt
Different periods throughout China’s history have different names, known as dynasties, for the diverse positions within its society. Theoretically, all of the periods are similar, with the government and military officials ranking high in the hierarchy, and the average everyday people being under regular Chinese law. Throughout China’s history, the society has been organized into a hierarchic system of socio-economic classes, known as the four occupations. The four occupations system seems to have become distorted after the commercialization of Chinese culture during the Song Dynasty. Even though the social rankings within the country are not as predominant as they once were, the people living within the country still know their “place” within the society.
The scholar gentry became such a dominant force in Chinese politics and society because they held a high status and prominent role. Those who were able to pass the difficult exams and earn position in high offices were treated with reverence and achieved special social status. They were also granted access to refined pleasures the elite could enjoy and had a great influence in the revival of Confucian ideas and values. 7. In what ways did relations between Chinese and Nomadic peoples to the North shape Chinese dynasties?
Lower class consisted of slaves, lower gods and many more. Mesopotamia followed "Hammurabi's code of Law" and China followed "Confucius Golden rule"
Both Han China and Classical India used social structure systems as a method of political control. The caste or class a person was born into in either China or India, determined your position and status, unless under extreme circumstances would a person be lowered or raised in a caste or class. However, how people were placed into a specific social structure were very different. Han China developed a social structure based upon literacy, and Classical India introduced a caste system based on “occupation”.
The lower class works for their living and spends what money they have on things they need. Whereas the upper class, usually has a higher education and better paying jobs than the other classes in America. Thus, heritage plays a big part in reasons of social classes.
Some might argue that India’s Caste system is closely related to However, Caste and social hierarchy were more different because Caste happens over different lifetimes, and social hierarchy can happen over one. In the caste system people could move their position in their current life, however they could have moved up or down depending on how they acted in their last life. In the Social hierarchy, men could move up or down depending on whom they married, however women could not move throughout the chain. “Women were generally seen as inferior to men, dominated by their bodies rather than their minds.” (McKay pg