ipl-logo

Chisholm's Human Freedom And The Self

1445 Words6 Pages

In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick Chisholm has taken a libertarian approach on the issue of free will and determinism. Libertarians believe that humans have free will and make a distinction that free will and determinism are incompatible. Chisholm has the same opinion. On the problem of human freedom, Chisholm thinks that “Human beings are responsible agents; but this fact appears to conflict with a deterministic view of human action (the view that every event that is involved in an act is caused by some other event); and it also appears to conflict with an indeterministic view of human action (the view that the act, or some event that is essential to the act, is not caused at all).”(Page 3). He does not agree that determinism or indeterminism …show more content…

If an agent cannot proceed differently in an event then the agent cannot be held morally responsible for the event. If we accept indeterminism then we believe that for an event to happen there is no control over it. The agent cannot cause the event but rather the possibility is that event will happen on chance. An agent cannot be held morally responsible for an event which just happened randomly. Chisholm thinks that, for an agent to be held responsible for an event, the event must not be caused by mere chance & it must not be caused by another event but rather the agent must cause the event. In my essay I will explain, why I agree with Chisholm for thinking that for an agent to be morally responsible for an event, the agent must cause the event so that he is held responsible for hic action when he could have chosen to act differently. I will illustrate why determinism fails in holding an agent responsible, opening up way for the Chisholm’s incompatibalist …show more content…

If X has caused the event then X can be held morally responsible. But we get to know that X is member of a white supremacist outfit. The rule of white supremacist outfit is that whenever you see a black man, you have to slap him or else you are dismissed from the outfit and become a killing target for other members of the white supremacist outfit. X tells us that he slapped the black man because of his association with the white supremacist outfit. The event of slap by X is caused by a previous event which is that X has joined an outfit which requires him to slap any black man he sees. In this situation, Chisholm will say that if X’s association with the white supremacist outfit caused him to slap the black man, then X is not responsible for slapping the black man. But if X caused himself to join the white supremacist outfit then X has still caused himself to join an outfit which lead him to slap the black man. Therefore X can be held morally responsible but If X was forced to join white supremacist outfit then X cannot be held responsible for his slap to the black man because he did not cause himself to join that outfit, therefore he cannot be held responsible for slapping the black man. In both situations (forced or not forced to join the outfit), X could not have chosen otherwise unless X was ready to face the consequences. At this moment Chisholm points out that (i) and

Show More
Related

  • Brief Summary Of The Book 'All American Boys'

    995 Words  | 4 Pages

    I chose this quote because it best explains how the cop might have been racist or it might explain how the police officer pounded Rashad into the sidewalk for no

    Read More

  • Profiles In Courage Shirley Chisholm Essay

    1091 Words  | 5 Pages

    In John Kennedy’s Profiles in Courage, he defines political courage as one’s willingness to take action on personal ethics, even though it may trigger public criticism, retaliation, and political death. (Kennedy 7) Shirley Chisholm, the first African American Congresswoman used her voice to advocate for racial minorities, women, and the poor. Chisholm was a bold woman who wasn’t afraid to raise current social issues that many avoided talking about. On account of her strong sense of justice, she faced numerous obstacles in her years in office for doing what she believed was in the best interest for our country.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Outcasts United By Warren St. John

    1444 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is very disappointing and shameful that a police officer acted this way because of the color of Chime’s skin. In the article Race, Modernity, and the Challenge of Democracy, the author says that everyday racism cuts into the cultural fabric of modern life when one “takes account of the experiential realisation of its violence and divisive logics, tracking its multiple expressions, its media amplifications, and mapping an affective cultural economy of fear and hatred are some of the tasks to be undertaken in countering it.” (Chambers) Racism is a very hard and unfair concept to understand. It is hard to grasp the knowledge of why someone treats people with different skin color so badly for no reason other than the fact that they are

    Read More

  • The Murder Of James Byrd Summary

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The law criminalizes violent acts (and attempts to commit violent acts undertaken with a dangerous weapon) when those acts occur because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person.” This article talked about a devastating

    Read More

  • Abner Louima Case

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    The assailant should have just given up, but he didn’t. Even though most people think that the penal system is not racist some people, like congresswoman Maxine Waters, say that “the color of your skin dictates whether you will be arrested or not, prosecuted harshly or less harshly, or receive a stiff sentence or gain probation or entry into treatment (“Is the Criminal Justice System Racist”). Even at a 2008 debate ”Barack Obama charged that blacks and whites “are arrested at very different rates, are convicted at very different rates, [and] receive very different sentences ... for the same crime” (“Is the Criminal Justice System

    Read More

  • What Chisholm Means

    63 Words  | 1 Pages

    In other words, when we say that an act is “free” that the act has the freedom necessary for moral responsibility. It does not mean that there is no cause, or that it was caused by a previous event that is caused by a previous event. It mean that it was caused by a person. This is what Chisholm means by an “agent.”

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Richard Wright's The Ethics Of Living Jim Crow

    650 Words  | 3 Pages

    There arises a problem when the officers intended to uphold this law target individuals solely based on their race. In one instance a Black woman was taken out of a car and forced into a building as a policeman watched on. When she emerged all bruised and bloodied, Wright “watched him throw her into a patrol wagon.” (7) The woman was arrested for supposedly being drunk when the officer had clearly seen that she had done nothing wrong and was instead the victim. Wright experienced this same phenomenon himself.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Just Walk On By Brent Staples

    934 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, it is not like the author is pulling these experiences out of thin air these are his experiences he is speaking of his own feelings. This adds so much more credibility to his message by showing readers a different point of view in situations usually told by the other side. Usually in any acts of “misconduct” between white and black people the side of the white person is mostly focused on and unless there is clear evidence contradicting the crime the black man is accused of there is a strong probability that the black man will go to jail

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech Outline On Abortion

    1277 Words  | 6 Pages

    “I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my

    Read More

  • American Identity In Douglass, And I Celebrate Myself

    1523 Words  | 7 Pages

    The American person has no true ideals, or beliefs that make him or her up. Americans are free to believe in what they want, think what they want, preach what they want, and most importantly say what they want . Authors such as Ralph Waldo Emerson, Frederick Douglass, and Walt Whitman show in their texts such as “Self-Reliance” , The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass , and “I Celebrate Myself” that there is no true definition of the American identity. The American identity can be seen in the many aspects of peoples lives, and a a quality that many Americans portray is the ability to have individual thoughts and emotions as well as the capability to not conform to society because they stand up for their own individual rights. A

    Read More

  • Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility By Galen Strawson

    878 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lucy Bichakhchyan Introduction to Philosophy Second Short Written Assignment GALEN STRAWSON THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Galen Strawson is a British philosopher, who is famous for his philosophical works on free will, panpsychism, causality, determinism etc. This paper is about his article “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”. The title of the article already gives away the stand that Strawson has considering Moral Responsibility..

    Read More

  • Evaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    1495 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he outlines the different scenarios in which one is responsible for her actions.  There is, however, a possible objection which raises the possibility that nobody is responsible for their actions.  Are we responsible for some of our actions after all?   If so, under what circumstances?

    Read More

  • Galen Strawson's Analysis

    786 Words  | 4 Pages

    Galen Strawson argues in his work, The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility, the theory that true moral responsibility is impossible. This theory is accurate whether determinism is true or false. Strawson describes this argument as the Basic Argument. He claims "nothing can be causa sui- nothing can be the cause of itself" (212).

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Roderick Chisholm And Susan Wolf

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    Also, he believes that a free agent “could have chosen otherwise.” A quote from the reading that accurately expresses Chisholm’s beliefs and views are, “We must not say that every event involved in the act is caused by some other event; and we must not say that it is not caused at all…We should say that at least one of the events that are involved in the act is caused, not by any other events, but by something else instead. And this something else can only be the agent - the man. ”(Chisholm 600) Chisholm objects indeterminism because, indeterminism is an event that happens randomly; it is not caused by something. Therefore this does not relate with moral

    Read More

  • Strain Theory In American History X

    1894 Words  | 8 Pages

    The crime was committed by a man named Derek Vinyard, a white supremacist. He murdered two black gang members after they attempted to steal his truck. If we look closely at the case of Derek Vinyard, we can see that the crime he committed weren’t just a spur-of-the moment thought of killing someone. The actions were rooted deep into his past, wherein his experiences have shaped him into the person that he was today. Certain aspects of his past have influenced his actions, including his environment, the companions that he keeps, his experiences, and a lot

    Read More

More about Chisholm's Human Freedom And The Self

Open Document