ipl-logo

Choreography Of American Politics Chapter 1 Summary

827 Words4 Pages

Chapter one is titled the Choreography of American Politics. The purpose of the chapter is to provide a description of how income inequality and political polarization evolved during the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century. In this chapter they introduce a system they have called NOMINATE. They used NOMINATE to measure political polarization in the House and Senate. Each legislator gets a score on where they are on a liberal conservative spectrum. This gives perspective to how polarized congress is. After introducing NOMINATE, the authors explain three measures of inequality. These measures are the income that goes to the top 1%, the amount of foreign born population, and the Gini coefficient. They express these measures of inequality …show more content…

This chapter focuses on other possible explanations for increased political polarization and then explain how they don’t account for increased polarizations. The authors give plenty of possible counterarguments for their audience to consider and then show why they are right by shutting those counterarguments down with an overwhelming amount of evidence. They introduce counterarguments like intraparty competition during primaries, partisan congressional reforms, redistricting, and Southern Realignment. Intraparty competition during primaries does not show significant differences in legislators for there to be a solid argument. There are statistics that show that polarization would have been unaltered even without changes in partisan congressional reforms. Polarization has been as extreme in the House as the Senate. The Senate has not been subject to any redistricting either. As for Southern Realignment, the north shows just as much polarization, where no realignment has occurred. This chapter had the best argument to make me believe that their main argument was true. The roundabout way they attacked the counterarguments was very …show more content…

The argument in this chapter is focused around how income inequality has caused voters to demand policies that redistribute income and wealth downward from the wealthy. This has been caused by a few different things according to the authors. Data shows that voters and nonvoters have a significant difference in income. This is because the bottom of income distribution consists of poor immigrants who aren’t citizens and have no voting rights. There was an explosion in immigration from poorer countries. Data also suggests that republican legislators have moved far to the right while democratic legislators have moved modestly to the left. This chapter was based on data that the authors collected as evidence for their main argument. This chapter felt like a place where the authors dumped a bunch of evidence and then tried to connect it to their points. They did well but I feel like they could have been more clear and concise in their

Show More
Related

  • Matthew Yglesias The Case For Partisanship Analysis

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article, “The Case for Partisanship” by Matthew Yglesias, he explains how in the 1950’s, the American Political Science Association’s Committee strongly presented the idea that polarization is good. Today, many people look down upon political polarization. The mid-20th century appeared united politically but in fact the country was deeply divided over civil rights and politics. Conservatives and liberals could appear in both the Republican and Democratic parties due to foreign policy and racial issues overlapping on traditional conservative and liberal beliefs. The interconnection of political parties in the past has suddenly gone down.

    Read More

  • Congressional Activity Summary

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    The differentiators that account for the variation are the parties and Congress. Meinke then deduces from the information that the majority party in Congress exhibits a significant substantial number of members that advertise their partisan activity — “…majority party status—and possibly the strength of the party brand name—is associated with the choice.” (Meinke 860) Meinke also discovers that the stronger the partisan base (measured by same-party presidential vote), there is a more

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Polarization In Congress

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    I believe that political polarization is very damaging to our society. As stated in the text book, polarization can lead to no middle ground for Americans. Having people who support a certain political party so strongly can prevent there to ever be a compromise. Tom Davis and Martin Frost, both former US Congressmen have even suggested a law requiring states to appoint representatives that are non-partisan in the hopes of diluting the polarization in Congress in 2008. They believe that too much polarization in Congress is because of the popularity of primary election for the government.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocking

    663 Words  | 3 Pages

    Representative John Tanner, offers sentiments on impending consequences caused by the Supreme Court and Congress lack of initiative in resolving this issue, “When Members come here from these partisan districts that have been gerrymandered . . . they have little incentive to really work across party line in order to reach solutions. If one comes here wanting to work across the aisle, one has to

    Read More

  • Filibustering In The Chamber Of Congress

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    Tristan Parker Mr. Mccormick AP Government 25 March 2018 Analysis 2 In the Congress of the United States, the majority party will have substantial influence over making legislation. Even though the majority party has a larger numerical amount of Representatives and Senators in the chambers of Congress, there is no security that the majority party’s legislation will be passed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. In addition to the majority party having the numerical advantage in the House of Representatives, they also have, control over the Speaker of the House and over all the Standing Committees. Though the Majority party may have the numerical Representative advantage, each chamber of Congress has a different variation of “rules” to abide by when making legislation and these can greatly affect legislation being passed or not.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

    1191 Words  | 5 Pages

    Salient issues rose the most in 2003-2004, 2005-2006, and 2011-2011 and that is not surprising given the introduction of new issues such as homeland security and global warming over the course of the last decade. Jefferson states, “the government is best which governs least”, but what affect does that have on society? The competition for power between separated institutions is a driving force. When the legislative and executive branches of our government engage in a power struggle, policies that could be potentially life changing or at the least beneficial, suffer at the hands of legislative gridlock. Polarization has a huge impact on the difficulties faced by congress.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

    1486 Words  | 6 Pages

    These districts usually result in partisanship representatives usually determined by the demographic characteristics of the district under consideration (Hirano et al, 2010). Hence, such representatives will largely hold on to their constituents viewpoints and this limits the possibility of bipartisanship efforts that can be used to break congressional gridlocks. The rise of anti-government sentiments has built distrust among the people who look for solutions from other areas. As such, legislations such as the Affordable Care Act among others become a tough sell on the ground and this takes the form of partisanship stand in the Congress and Senate (Teter, 2013). The ensuing gridlock becomes difficult to break resulting in

    Read More

  • Culture War The Myth Of A Polarized America Analysis

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, Morris Fiorina addresses the issue of the illusion of political polarization. Political polarization is the separation of political beliefs into two separate extremes. The main illustration Fiorina uses is the use the electoral map. The electoral map is used to gauge which party won an election or polling.

    Read More

  • The Rise Of Political Parties In The 1790s

    973 Words  | 4 Pages

    The majority of us now relate the American political system to the constant rivalry between political parties. While they vie for the support and votes of the American people, Republican and Democratic Party leaders engage in what seems like an endless debate. Early American Republic two centuries ago, and our founding fathers were essentially at peace with this reality. The majority of them, along with President Washington, were worried that the formation of political parties would split the young nation into warring sections, damage our sense of national identity, and weaken support for the new Constitution. Although the American Constitution aimed to prevent the formation of political factions, the rise of political parties in the 1790s

    Read More

  • Political Polarization In Congress On The Affordable Care Act

    1022 Words  | 5 Pages

    Polarization in both politicians is evident, especially when pertaining to controversial issues. This paper will explore the political polarization in Congress on the issue of health care, with a focus on the Affordable Care Act. The thesis of this paper is to highlight how polarized politics on health care leaves no place for moderates or bipartisanship. Polarization in Congress often leads to the gridlock, which has been a constant pain for Americans.

    Read More

  • Congressional Polarization

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the last decade congressional polarization has increased at alarming rates causing Washington insiders and outsiders alike to worry about the future of American politics and democracy. While Democrats and Republicans on The Hill cannot agree on much, they both acknowledge that the increasing level of polarization in Washington is crippling the entire legislative branch, thereby undermining the greatest democracy in the world. Numerous public opinion polls, over the last few years, have shown that the vast majority of the American public, regardless of party affiliation, disapproves of, and feels unrepresented by, the extremely polarized legislature (Gallup, 2016). However, year after year, despite how many Americans become disgruntled

    Read More

  • They Say I Say Analysis

    886 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today, there are endless arguments about the existing of the American dream. In “They say, I say” by Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. There are four article that I have evaluated. The upside of income inequality – Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy, American Dream: dead, alive, or on hold – Brandon King, Bring on more immigrant entrepreneur – Shayan Zadeh, America remains the world’s beacon of success – Tim Roemer

    Read More

  • Wealth Gap In Congress

    717 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dating back to its inception Congress “has never been a place for paupers (Lightblau, 5).” With each change in the country, the United States Congress rarely deviated away from its long-standing tradition of having wealthy, white men heavily represented in both chambers. Individuals who were elected ranged from “plantation owners, industrialists, ex- Wall Street financiers and Internet executives (Lightblau, 5).” Research conducted shows that “the typical member of Congress is worth more than nine times the typical voter that puts them in Washington (Thompson, 2).”

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    1370 Words  | 6 Pages

    Increased polarization correlates with inequality. Research from Princeton and Georgetown prove or point to the correlative connection. One problem with this is that political polarization prevents Congress from acting on economic issues, especially ones directly concerning inequality (McCarty). Gerrymandering by design creates incumbents. The predictive power and capture of campaign finance colludes with gerrymandering, whether it’s “cracking” or “packing.”

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The Two Party System

    2506 Words  | 11 Pages

    Finally, it will be argued that the modern political party system in the United States is a two-party system dominated by the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. These two parties have won every United States presidential election since 1852 and have controlled the United States Congress since 1856. The Democratic Party generally positions itself as centre-left in American politics and supports a modern American liberal platform, while the Republican Party generally positions itself as centre-right and supports a modern American conservative platform. (Nichols, 1967)

    Read More

More about Choreography Of American Politics Chapter 1 Summary

Open Document