Christian-Based Justifications for New World Conquests
In A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies, Bishop Bartholomew de las Casas questions the supposedly Christian based motivations of the Spaniards when conquering the indigenous tribes in the New World. In The Letter of Columbus to Luis de Sant Angel Announcing His Discovery, Columbus posits that conquering the land was a duty and right as Spaniards, barely regarding capture and torture of the native peoples in his overtaking of land and gold. In Democrates Alter, Or, on the Just Causes for War Against the Indians, Sepulveda argues the violence committed by the Spaniards as necessary to carry out a Christian duty. All texts are based in the New World of Latin America. All authors
…show more content…
I will also use the term “New World” to reference the places that the Spaniards travelled to. Though in a similar setting with the same religion, each text maintains a different view on the matters of Spanish conquests, which makes for an interesting discussion when comparing similarities all three. Despite a difference of opinion of how to convert, these three texts A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies, The Letter of Columbus to Luis de Sant Angel Announcing His Discovery, and Democrates Alter, Or, on the Just Causes for War Against the Indians similarly posit justification for violent acts and conversion of the indigenous peoples based on religious beliefs. To defend my argument, I will first explain the similar aspects between the three texts regarding the acknowledgement of the cruel actions against the natives to gain more knowledge of the land and its people. I will then discuss the similar opinion of each author that argues a Christian duty to convert the natives after having gained information about the New World. After explaining each author’s interpretation of the events and Christian practices, I will outline the contrasting religious-based justifications for events …show more content…
De las Casas claims that Christians should not commit violent acts to force their faith on others, arguing that non-believers should come to the Christian faith justly and for the sole purpose of knowing the Christian God. Columbus, though, clearly uses Christianity as a device to re-shape the natives into relatable and usable people for the Spanish kingdom. “They took even pieces of broken barrel-hoops, and gave whatever they had, like senseless brutes; insomuch that it seemed to me bad. I forbade it, and I gave gratuitously a thousand useful things that I carried, in order that they may conceive affection, and furthermore may become Christians” (Columbus, 1493). Columbus means to give them tools to be learned to produce efficient and submissive slaves. Columbus uses conversion as an instrument to enact his priority of taking slaves and conquering the land. Alternatively, Sepulveda argues that no one can truly know exactly what the Christian God desires for His people and consequently cannot know which actions are truly righteous in nature despite the Christian Bible’s teachings. “Those words from the bible are not laws in the obligatory sense of the word, but rather advice and exhortation which do not belong so much to
When you hear the names of Christopher Columbus, Alonso Zuazo, and Bartolomé delas Casas, do you think of good characteristics of them? There are people that agree or disagree if these individuals actually made history without taking credit from someone else. Native Americans plays a big part with all these individuals. I’ll discuss the exploitation of Christopher Columbus, Alonso Zuazo, and Bartolomé delas Casas. Also, how the Native Americans were enslaved, labor source being required, and replacements were found.
He continued to say, that Christopher applied “moral code” when he came upon his men stealing gold. He continues to say, “He was interested in discovery, in wealth and prestige. He wasn’t interested in genocide.” The orthodox views of Louis De Vorsey and Dauril Alden conclude by stating how Columbus was unaware,
Like many missionaries, De Las Casa envisioned a dream of new findings, useful tools, and riches. However, upon arriving to the “newly found” territory that was discovered the Conquistadors had already assumed that the Indians were naïve and too trusting, for that reason, they would be slaughtered. Until the time came to seize, the conquerors made sure to form strong relationships that ensured the indigenous people of no harmful doing, to their knowledge. Amid sharing personal secrets, values, beliefs, and belongings came an overwhelming sense of greed which triggered the crucial and harsh reality which was soon to come. Nevertheless, still being gullible, thinking this was a fair trade they continued which contributed to their downfall of
On the first island he reached, he took a few natives by force because they might know things about what there is in that area. Also, the Arawaks, the first natives Columbus met, wore tiny gold ornaments in their ears, so Columbus forced them to show him where they found the gold. As his journey continues, he forces a group of natives to make a trade where they gave him many more bows and arrows that they wanted to. Additionally, at that time, the main religion in Europe was Christianity, so when Columbus reached land, he forced all the natives he came across to convert into Christianity. Columbus also thought that the natives would make good slaves because they were very generous and didn’t argue with you much.
Chapter 1: 1. Zinn’s purpose for writing history the way that he did was to give the viewpoints of the people that were affected- not just the people who were in charge like in most history textbooks. He sought to get the most truthful accounts of America since most sources for history lie about the past with bias by omitting facts, stating facts and burying them in a mass of other facts, or just lying outright. 2. Columbus is depicted as heroic in most history textbooks for braving the seas and discovering the Americas for Europe but, in actuality, his intentions were selfish and his means were cruel.
Las Casas`s work provoked heated debate in Spain and initiated reforms designed to bring greater “love and moderation” to Spanish-Indians relationships. He wrote it for Charles I of Spain. The purposes for writing this was his fear of Spain coming under divine punishment (God`s corporal punishment) and his concern for the souls of the Native Americans. The account is one of the first attempts by a Spanish writer of the colonial era to show examples of unjust treatment that indigenous people endured in the early stages of the Spanish conquest of the Greater Antilles, particularly the island of
Riding on a wave of religious righteousness, the Spaniards wanted to “help” the natives of Columbus’s island by introducing them to their amazing religion, or at least, that was what happened from their perspective. The natives of the island, however, saw it in a different light. They had strangers arriving in boatloads with strange animals, looking for gold. On top of that, they were forcing them to abandon their animism for this religion which in no way celebrated their values and beliefs. The Europeans were not suggesting a trade of information and a compromise, like the consensus statement suggests, but instead, forcing an unwanted change on the Native Americans.
He emphasizes their bravery and determination, highlighting their successful encounters with the natives and their ability to navigate the seas. However, Columbus's representation of the Spanish is also problematic, as he downplays the violence and aggression they employed in their interactions with the natives. Instead, he refers to their conquests as "discoveries" and justifies their actions by claiming they bring civilization and Christianity to the "New World." Columbus's representation of the Spanish reveals his desire to explain their actions and secure their power and
At one point some Indians escaped a ship that was going to take them to Hispaniola to be sold as slaves, and the Spaniards sent a ship to voyage through the island for three years to hunt down those who fled. It is astonishing how cruel the Christians were solely for personal and materialistic
This source was written in 1542, and this speech was given to the people of the country of Spain. The Martolome De Las Casas, the lord Prince of Spains don Felipe gave this speech to the people. Giving this speech, the Prince shows how horrid the idea of the Christians killing and destroying the Indies. The Christians represent the English and the Indies are the Indians. The Christians invaded North America and stole the Indians’ gold, food, and killed a multitude of them: “The cause for which the Christians have slain and destroyed so many and such infinite numbers of souls, has been simply to get, as their ultimate end, the Indians’ gold of them, and to stuff themselves with riches in a very few days, and to raise themselves to high estates...
In Chapter two section “Encountering the Spanish” Nichols stated, “The Indians’ first experiences with the Spanish proved more violent and disruptive than their meetings with most other Europeans.” I believe that the intentions of the Spanish Invasion of 1513 was always of evil and served not for religious purposes, but to further greed and corruption. The invasion was to let the Indians know and be alert that the Spanish wanted them to give up, convert to christianity, or else they will be killed. Furthermore, the Spanish feel that they have met the legal and religious obligation to take possession of the land and wage war against the natives. The requerimiento was a recitation of the Christian history of the world followed by the requirement that the Natives come forward of their own free will to convert to Catholicism.
When Columbus arrived to the Americas he did not convert one Native American. Columbus had been on the same land with the Natives and yet “not one of them was converted to the Catholic faith, which was supposedly a prime motive of those voyages.” Instead of converting the Natives and being friendly with them he was just oppressive towards them. Also Columbus did not contribute any new information to Europe’s existing knowledge. He set out to gather new information for Europe so that they can improve their education about the world.
For Columbus, his attitude towards the natives in more ways than one, is leaning towards the idea of slavery. After they warm up to him, he sees from the way they are dressed and by the gifts they give him, that they are easily conquerable. He explains that, “after they have been reassured and have lost their fear, they are so guileless and so generous with all they possess” (29). This brings up the idea for Columbus to use them as slaves later on to get what he wants overall. His overall attitude comes to be the idea of power over the natives.
In 1492 Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue. We all know this catchy tune right? But what we don’t know, is what Columbus thought when he arrived in the North America or what he though of the Native Americans he met. In fact, we don’t know much about all the explorers after Columbus and what they thought. Each explore had their own view of the Native Americans, and three great examples are Columbus, Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de Las Casas
In 1550, Emporer Charles V summoned a debate to determine how Spain would deal with the Native Americans. Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de Las Casas engaged in discourse about this topic: Sepúlveda denigrated the Natives while de Las Casas defended them. Sepúlveda felt that the Native Americans were basically barbaric sub-humans, and that the Europeans were greatly superior to them. He felt that Christianity was far more altruistic than the Natives’ religions. However, Las Casas felt that the Natives should be treated equally, since he believed Jesus died for the Natives just like he died for the Europeans.