ipl-logo

Christine Mitchell When Living Is Worse Than Death Summary

517 Words3 Pages

Being a Doctor is one of the most arduous job there is. It involves having to make tough life and death decisions, but what happens when the best course of action that the doctors see is to just let the patient die, if only to spare them the pain of living. In the article “When Living Is Worse Than Death” by Christine Mitchell this topic is talked about using the case of a terminally ill child and how her parents wanted to keep her alive through any means necessary despite the medical teams advisements. This article does raise some good points about the morality of letting patients die without having to go though needless suffering with no hope of recovery , however it only shows the one viewpoint and as such lacks strong enough evidence to make a solid argument.
“When Living Is a Fate Worse Than Death” by Christine Mitchell is about a child named Charlotte who was born missing most of her brain cells,a condition which meant …show more content…

Based on what the author wrote, the choice to let the child die and avoid needless pain seems the most logical and merciful choice. Now don't get me wrong I agree with this point for the most part, however I can understand the parents reasoning. One of the worst things in life is losing a loved one and I can't even begin the pain of that loved one being your own child. What they did can be seen as inhumane, keeping a child alive despite the advisement of her doctors. That viewpoint is very clearly shown in this article, but in complex issues of morality like this it is so rarely that simple and this article fails to illustrate that or ever use other sources of evidenceto help prove her own

Show More
Related

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Ethical Issues

    1290 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction People have moral and ethical values that assist them in making decisions about their healthcare on a daily basis. What if a person found out that they had a terminal illness and only had months to live? What if those few months would be filled with treatments, pain and suffering, tear filled family members, and high cost medical bills? Physician- assisted suicide remains a debated topic which causes physicians, nurses and those involved to take a look at what they value and what they are willing to do in order to carry out a patient’s wishes.

    Read More

  • The Argument Of Double Effect In Physician Assisted Suicide

    106 Words  | 1 Pages

    The last argument that this paper will look at is the argument of double effect. In the context of terminal illness physician assisted suicide could instead be seen as a vital form of care for someone who is suffering, instead of the failure of medicine. Physician assisted suicide seems to oppose the pro-life view, but on closer examination, its purpose is instead to relieve suffering in imminently terminal cases where it is thought that no other treatment could reasonably hope to do the same. Even though traditionally the role of the doctor is seen as extending life, that role may also encompass the assistance in PAS.

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Summary

    1953 Words  | 8 Pages

    Gill argues that keeping a person healthy cannot be a physician’s only moral duty because in cases of terminal ill patients, they can no longer be treated or healed (372). If a physician’s only duty were to heal patients then they would not tend to the terminally ill because there would be nothing else that they could do, which is something that most people would find to be morally wrong (Gill, 373). No one would be okay with a doctor not helping a person at all who has received a terminal sentence. So instead of promoting health in this case, the physicians must find a way to reduce the suffering of the patient. This means that the physician should be able to reduce the suffering in the way that the patient asks for.

    Read More

  • Immigrant Crimes: Cultural Tactic

    1075 Words  | 5 Pages

    This scenario is talking about two young Japanese mothers in San Francisco and Los Angeles who killed their children after learning that their husbands were having affairs. Their cases were only accused of manslaughter after experts suggested that parent-child suicide is frequently practiced in the women’s native culture after the wives got humiliated by their husband’s infidelity. However, I believed that the two women should receive the penalty of that to murder. As Fresno Superior Court Judge Gene M. Gomes claim that, “Even without intent to commit a certain crime, if an act is harmful to society, we are not going to condone it,” I truly agree with that because murder is an inappropriate behavior. As an outsider, I don’t fully understand the Japanese concept of killing their child, but I don’t believe if a mother is not evil enough, she will kill her own child just to add guilt to her husband.

    Read More

  • Assisted Suicide Persuasive Speech

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    People who are involved in these can suffer just as much as the patient. The choices bear on the good of the population, doctors are supposed to help your health, knowledge, and friendships. They are taught to save lives not to take them away. They are taught to act against anything that brings harm towards the person. To end someone’s life even for a better end shows what someone thinks of human life.

    Read More

  • Lisa Belkin's Book 'First Do No Harm'

    1633 Words  | 7 Pages

    Quality of life, live or let die, and extraordinary measures. These are principles critical to medical professionals and the decisions they make every single day. In Lisa Belkin’s book “First Do No Harm”, she explores many real life cases, and how different physicians and teams answered the questions asked of them: Do we withdraw life saving support? Does the patient require DNR status? Do we allow a child die under our care?

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Essay

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    This contentious theory contends that people should have the freedom to decide how and when to end their lives in situations where pain and suffering are unavoidable. Although there is much discussion about this concept and it creates ethical and moral issues, it emphasizes how crucial it is to provide people choices and support so they may control their end-of-life experiences. In the end, society must decide how to handle this delicate situation and make sure that everyone's rights and well-being are

    Read More

  • The Ethical And Legal Issues Of Mrs. Mcgoldrick's Case

    2084 Words  | 9 Pages

    McGoldrick’s case. Her case focuses on two sides of one coin: living with dignity and dying with dignity. From a principlism perspective, there is tension between respecting patient autonomy – assuming decision-making capacity – and beneficence, from a clinical standpoint (9). Treatment from a ‘best-interest’ and dignity perspective differs among the various stakeholders in the case, where the family and physician believe potentially life-sustaining options must be pursued, though the patient outwardly refuses those treatments. The ethics of Mrs. McGoldrick’s wish to die and refuse treatment hinges largely upon whether she has decision-making capacity.

    Read More

  • Suffering Before Dying: A Brief Analysis

    107 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rachel poses an argument against the conventional doctrine claiming that many cases where a patient is left to die are in fact worse than actually killing them. Because if the person is going to die in either case then why would it be morally permissible to let them slowly die? Either way, the patient is dead. Yet the conventional doctrine usually adds a requirement of suffering before dying. Rachel uses the example of the refusal of treatment to defective new-borns - and the subsequent death of the infant because of dehydration- in order to further prove that certain cases of letting die are actually worse than

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Ethics Essay

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    Physician assisted suicide and/or Euthanasia is very controversial involving the topic of ethics. In ethics, when determining what is deemed substantially right or wrong, there is tremendous difficulty in finding a true black or white. To better explain, “physician assisted suicide is defined as the deliberate termination of a patient’s life by administering a lethal drug through a direct or indirect help from a physician” (Youngman, 2013). Throughout the text, what will be examined is assisted suicide influenced by the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. Since almost every ethical issue arises when a matter concerning two remarkably different possibilities conflict with one another, the theory of Immanuel Kant may be able to find a definitive solution to this concerning ethical issue pertaining to euthanasia and/or physician assisted suicide.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Right To Die

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    Human beings have the right to live, and the right to die. If there was no right to die, living would be considered a duty. One’s sickness may desire them to not continue with life if their condition causes extreme pain, discomfort, lack of independence, and make living unbearable. Doctor assisted suicide is a popular controversy because sometimes it is not done with ethicality and lethal dose of pain medication is administered or certain treatments are withheld. However when carried out with ethicality, a pill or injection is administered in the proper amount to cause death.

    Read More

  • Respirator's Argument Against Euthanasia

    761 Words  | 4 Pages

    Beside my stand, others believes Physicians and other medical care people should not involve themselves indirectly causing death; however, if they will not be willing to provide a way to relieve extreme pain when a person 's quality of life is low, then what is the meaning of freedom of choice for citizen is when they cannot choose the right for themselves. Even though, the author had “dreamed of disconnecting” her patient’s respirator, yet every day she forced to “make her death impossible and her life unbearable” (Page 458). As the Physician she “ feel differently toward her than the father toward his son”, and that is why the author did not takes off the respirator; knowing, it would be an easy way for killing the women, since never have the same emotional connection as the father (page 458). Finally, the author never had the admiration feeling for women to be able to convict a murder just as the father has done for his infant. Risking one’s life for someone else is not supporting euthanasia, yet giving peace to those painful souls one’s should not have the guilt to live

    Read More

  • Atul Gawande Whose Body Is It Anyway Analysis

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    Atul Gawande in his article “Whose body is it, anyway?” introduced couple of cases, which discussed a controversial topic, doctors dealing with patients and making important medical decisions. These are difficult decisions in which people might have life or death choices. Who should make the important decisions, patients or doctors? Patients don’t usually know what is better for their health and while making their decisions, they might ignore or don’t know the possible side effects and consequences of these decisions.

    Read More

  • End Of Life Care Ethical Issues

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Decision-making for end-of-life care has earned paramount importance as it has capability to prolong human life with the support of medical technologies or can let the natural death process continue by foregoing the treatment option. Hence, end-of-life care is facing various ethical dilemmas” (Karnik & Kanekar, 2016). Due to advances in medical technology, the decisions regarding death and dying are changing.

    Read More

  • The Good Life Thomson Analysis

    1520 Words  | 7 Pages

    A crucial premise in that argument is that the right to life must be held to a higher degree of importance than any other right. Thomson believes that premise to be false and uses the first of several examples of which she makes use throughout the paper to persuade her readers. These examples are designed to show that there are situations where it is permissible to take an action in order to reason with a person’s own rights even though doing so violates an innocent person right to life. A person must always consider another person’s life before they make a life changing decision. Every person has the right to life.

    Read More

More about Christine Mitchell When Living Is Worse Than Death Summary

Open Document