In this primary document, we learn more about the naives description wise in detailed as opposed to many of the other documents we have discussed. Though they did talk about how the natives praised them, the document did focus more on how they acted without severe or exaggerated descriptions. I found this interesting because we finally were able to put together a better image then we had before. As opposed to the documented letter written by Christopher Columbus you get a different feel here.In addition to the message of the clear image of the natives the second message was clear, the spanish were there to take the land over and to steal the riches away from the land.
As discussed by my classmates and I we did come to the conclusion that most
…show more content…
Take this for example you see a person for the first time and they approach you most of the time you are not going to be rude or violent, you may be nice and try to see who they are and what they want. The same thing was probably done by the native people of the land but we don’t exactly know due to the fact that we do not speak that language nor were we there at the time but curiosity probably came off as them being very easy to please and very docile people. In the documentary we watched we observed other behaviors which state otherwise but that is getting myself into a different subject. Also in the document Pero Vaz de Camiha also explains how the natives were telling him that there was gold and silver amongst other things on the land, all because they were simply pointing at the object and then towards the land, who really knows if this is what they were saying, or it could have been interperted as saying “ I want that give it to me so I can bring it back home”. Maybe they simply wanted the items but that is not what the spanish wanted to believe, they wanted to believe that they found something great, that they discovered great land and to record and send their findings …show more content…
Somethings never change no matter how much time goes by and its quite a shame. Through the years so much of their lifestyles have changed because of all the influences and we are only making matter worse by continuing to strip away all of the riches left or attempting to change their religious belief. Latin America still continues to this day to show its true beauty and power there are still treasures that are yet to be discovered by any man. Because of the constant intrusion of the larger more powerful countries that go in and try to ‘help’, in the end, most of the time, only leads to more hurt than anything else. Some traditions have been lost in time while other trading are still fighting to stay alive, many elder in many of these countries don’t let the new generations forget about their true roots and their true beliefs, way before anything was introduced to them of foreign decent. Keep Latin America authenticity has always been the
Throughout the 16th to 17th century, European powers were scrambling to find opportunities in the New World. Three prominent European countries; the British, French, and Spanish, were exploring the Americas for their own personal agendas. They wanted to find ways to expand their empires and also to build their respective economies. However, they ran into the Native American populations that had settled in these “new lands.” As expected, conflict between the two groups emerged.
What is Christopher Columbus day? Christopher Columbus day is when people of America celebrate the day Columbus discovered America in 1492 every October and call him a hero. Many historians have honored him and called him a hero as they learned more. (“Columbus Controversy”). However, what society does not know is what he had done to the Natives and their culture.
A: “I only have to say that I don’t understand what the point of stealing the home of people is. They take our homes and enslave us and kill us, personally I don’t understand it and I think it is unfair. We are being depicted as ignorant savages who are not as good as the Europeans, but how are we worse?” Overall, it seems like the natives disliked Juan Ponce de León and his soldiers as well as other explorers because of the stories that they heard. The natives were so threatened that when they saw Juan Ponce de León and his crew that they killed him.
Initially colonizing in the southern parts of North America and Mesoamerican regions with expectations of gold, the Spanish were not coming to the New World to make new friends. The name “conquistadores,” in English “conquerors,” is an accurate self-assessment
One of the lasting impact the Spanish settlements had; the settlers created a bad relationship with the natives. The natives had several purposes to contemn the settlers. One reason being, in document c, that it states that the natives inculpated the settlers, or more specifically priests, for transporting disease from Spain to the native’s motherland. Corresponding to the natives, the settlers also have their motives for resenting the natives. For instance, the Apache and Comanches tribes had slaughtered several innocent settlers and soldiers, as well as raiding a couple of missions around San Antonio and La Bahia (doc b).
The two documents helped support the traditional myths that the Native Americans thought that the Spanish were seen as Gods. In document 2, written by Nahua, the first words spoken to the Spaniards from the Tlaxcalan rulers were "Welcome, our lords." (p. 9). On the same page from the same document, the Tlaxcalans "showed them great honors, they gave them what they needed and attended to them". The Spaniards were treated as one who is much more than just the common man.
Braford E. Burns began writing The Poverty of Progress as a historical essay arguing against the “modernization” of nineteenth century Latin America. Burns argues that modernization was preformed against the will of the majority and benefited a small group of Creole Elite, while causing an exponential drop in the quality of life for folk majority. Burns supports his research through a series of dichotomies. Within the first twenty years of the nineteenth century the majority of Latin America gained independence from Spain.
However, the Natives had not done anything wrong to make the Spaniards act to cruel towards them. Las Casas wrote in great detail what the Spaniards did. He wrote of the destruction and slaughter that the Spanish brought to the Natives. Las Casas wrote about indians being thrown into pits of stakes. He wrote of children being torn away from their mothers and killed.
They considered themselves to be superior to the natives because the natives didn’t understand the value of their gold. The Spaniards thought the natives weren’t as smart as them because of
The Native Americans were seen as weak willed, for they barely resisted the conquest of their homes. If the Native Americans showed no incentive of retaliating and were better at manual work, it seemed natural to the Spanish that they be enslaved. The Native Americans, on the other hand, saw the Spanish in a different light as well as they watched many Spaniards become obsessed with gold. The Spanish were given Gold as gifts and went crazy just holding it and lusting for more, like savage monkeys. The Spanish, by nature, couldn’t help but become greedy monsters for gold, because in Europe riches were equivalent to power.
When the settlers went to start up the agricultural industry in the rural areas of Latin America, there was obviously a smaller population of both natives and Europeans in that region. Colonisers needed workers and locals needed work; both parties had no choice but to interact with one another. Ortiz states that everybody was “snatched from their original social groups, their own cultures destroyed and crushed under the weight of the cultures in existence here” (Ortiz 1947: 98). As the Europeans needed to raise funds in order to pay for their transportation costs from home, they required gold, silver and sugar for export. For the workers gathering these resources, the indigenous people supplied them food and clothes.
A quote which describes this best is one by Uruguayan journalist Eduardo Galeano “Latin America is the region of open veins. Everything, from the discovery until our times, has always been transmuted into European— or later United States— capital, and as such has accumulated in distant centers of power. Everything: the soil, its fruits and its mineral-rich depths, the people and their capacity to work and to consume, natural resources and human resources” (Galeano,
Martí saw this as an opportunity to demonstrate the effects of imperialism of other nations in Latin America. It has
This power imbalance and these payments are key in the subjugation of the natives. Furthermore, the paternalism of the Spanish toward the Indigenous peoples is obvious: “Captain [Cortes] stared at him [Cuauhtemoc]…then patted him on the head” (p.117). Post-conquest, and still today, “difficult relations” between the descendants of the Indigenous peoples and the “others” (p.117) still exist. The European view of the natives “as idolatrous savages” or, on the contrary, as “models of natural virtue” (p.175) demonstrate the versatile and often contradictory views held. Similarly, the Aztecs at times saw the Spaniards as gods, and other times as gold-hungry savages who “fingered it like monkeys” (p.51).
Many Latin American countries struggled to gain independence and resist European culture to form their own. Some academics, specifically the Uruguayan Jose Enrique Rodo, argued that only Northern European culture should be rejected and that their Latin culture was superior; while this differs from Martí’s view of building a strong national pride that embraces multiple races and cultures, it does align with the poem in that it emphasizes a pride in a culture that is different than the “master.”