Chuck Klosterman Analysis

What are the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to succeed in a negligence case? The four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to succeed in a negligence case are: (i) Duty of care, (ii) Breach of duty, (iii) Injury, (iv) Causation (i)Duty of care: Duty can be defined as a legal obligation the defender or a wrongdoer owes to the plaintiff. When the law recognizes a relationship between two parties, the duty of care arises. These parties are called defendant and the plaintiff.

Each human services specialist organizations must take after the 4 fundamental standards of medicinal services morals profounder by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in 1985. A- Autonomy: In therapeutic science it alludes to one side of the patient to hold control over her body. A medicinal services proficient can recommend or exhort, however any activities that endeavor to influence or pressure the patient into settling on a decision are infringement of this standard. B-Non-Maleficence:- It intends to do no damages.

On August 20, 1969, Prosenjit Poddar told Dr. Lawrence Moore that he intended to kill one Tatiana Tarasoff. Dr. Lawrence Moore was a psychologist employed by the Cowell Memorial Hospital at the University of California at Berkeley. The campus police briefly detained Poddar, but released him because he appeared to be rational. Dr. Harvey Powelson, Moore's superior, also agreed that Poddar could be released. No one warned the victim's parents (plaintiffs) of the threat to Tatiana.

America’s current president, Donald Trump, is constantly criticized for his twitter rants, temper, and rash decisions. While there are many supporters of everything to do with President Trump, there are many more who are starting to question his mental faculties and if he is the best fit for the job at hand. Donald Trump shows similar traits to dictators like Adolf Hitler, Kim Jong Un, and Josef Stalin, such as narcissism, psychopathy, and antisocial personality disorder. Should the President of the United States be forced to undergo testing to ensure that they are stable and do not possess such alarming traits before being sworn into office?

The scenario of Dr. H using his own sperm and then, Mary the nurse overhearing him telling that he was at risk of professional sanctions because some of his of patients are accusing him of using his own sperm during the procedures. This case and many others where a trusted man of authority of abusing his power by inseminating his/her patients with power by inseminating his/her patients with his own sperm. It is certainly a sad story which unfolded in the community. This physician violated the patient rights because before the treatment started both the patient and doctor went into contractual agreement. The doctor went to threaten many, the nurse who worked with him.

The professional values that I have chosen to reflect on is consent. Using Driscoll (2007) model of reflection which is components circle involves three events: what? So what? Now what? A reflection account will focus on my experience of working in the surgical ward.

Objection 1: In the instance of a school shooting, how does a nurse display empathy for someone who did something so horrible? If the shooter is being admitted to the hospital of the nurse’s employment, the shooting was likely in close proximity. If one of the victims was known by the nursing staff, they may be reluctant to provide care.

Vladimir Tarasoff, et al., Plaintiffs-Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al., Defendants-Respondents. Decided on July 1 1976 by the California Supreme Court • Type of case Case facts: October 1969, Prosenjit Poddar murdered Tatiana Tarasoff. Tatiana’s parents, said that only a short time ago, Poddar had expressed his intention to carry out the act. They said he had confided to his therapist, Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist employed by the University of California. They also implied Dr. Moore had warned campus police of Poddar’s intentions.

NECESSARY EVIL – EXPERT WITNESS *Manavendra Gupta Justice Denver Dillard was trying to decide whether a slow-witted Iowa man accused of acting as a drug mule was competent to stand trial. The court strongly relied on expert witnesses as the defense alleged that the accused did not fit the parameters of an ordinary man. The conclusions of the two psychologists called upon as experts in the case were ‘polar opposites’. On the one hand, the defendant’s expert who had been a veteran in the field, working for over 20 years, concluded that the accused was mentally retarded with a verbal I.Q. of 58 and did not understand even the proceedings.

Utilitarianism, Kantian/deontological, and virtue ethics are some of the moral theories that have been touched upon in class. These theories apply to our everyday life and in many ways make their way into the medical field and our everyday life. There are positive and negatives for each of these theories and all have their own take on biomedical ethical issues. In the article “Autonomy Trumps All? A Kantian Critique of Physician-Assisted Death” by Hoa Trung Dinh, the article explores the views and thoughts of physician-assisted deaths and if they are morally ethical.