The role of the Roman pope in religious and political life changed dramatically in the eleventh and twelfth centuries because church reform and the crusades brought about new tensions. The pope, most notably Pope Leo IX and Pope Gregory VII, played an important role in church reform, often battling with those in power to purify the church and redefine the place of the church in the world. The pope also became more assertive militarily, as seen in Pope Urban II when he called for the crusades. Reform greatly changed the role of the papacy, and reform came about due to many reasons. After the end of the Carolingian era, power was more localized and divided between dukes, counts, and lords, who founded their own monasteries. They chose their …show more content…
One clash was the 11th century investiture conflict between King Henry IV and Pope Gregory VII, concerning church leadership. Henry had placed an archbishop in power, but Gregory disagreed with his authority to do so. Pope and bishop elections were defining issues of reform and challenged the balance between powers that had existed in the past (monarchs and popes working together to rule). Gregory argued that kings should not be able to place archbishops in office, as kings and emperors were only laymen and should not be involved in church affairs. In the letters exchanged between the two, Henry argued that Gregory was disrespecting him and the lord for questioning his authority to choose a pope, since Henry was king by god’s decision (Rosenwein, Reading, 259). In response, Gregory excommunicated him and tried to convince others to abandon the king. The conflict would come to divide Europe as people scrambled to choose sides. Gregory argued that royal power should not be greater than papal. (Rosenwein, Reading, 260). The pope used his power to do away with the corruption of kings and emperors, thus playing a major role in church reform. By attempting to prevent monarchs from selecting papal leaders, the pope sought to reform the church at its roots. Uncorrupted leaders would lead to a less corrupt church (tainted by money and special favors) overall. Gregory claimed that popes should have all power …show more content…
For example, Leo IX would travel around (uncommon for a pope at the time) and speak to people (Whalen, October 19 Lecture). One action that could garner support was the declaration of wars. The changes within Europe itself had much to do with the crusades. A strong and assertive Roman papacy with more power emerged and Pope Urban II called for the first crusade (Whalen, October 7 Lecture). The idea of enforcing peace through violence is related to the Peace and Truce of God. The pope advocated for turning to outside enemies and an innovative kind of holy war emerged (Whalen, MP, 103). The role of the pope became more aggressive and religion was used as a means to violence. Through the violence, the pope could continue to reform. He also used promises of remission of all sins to motivate people to fight. (Whalen, MP, 107). “The popes of Rome united the idea of sanctified violence with the penitential ethos of pilgrimage, carried out with the promise of spiritual rewards granted by the authority of the Apostolic See” (Whalen 103). Urban also told people that they could get new land through the crusades (Urban II, Sermon). Though the pope wasn’t directly offering people land, this relates back to how kings and emperors would use land as currency in the localized world. Of course wars related to religion had been fought before, but the crusades were unique
Some was to improve the methods of the church and some was to improve their lifestyle for the opportunity of themselves. The purpose in all this was to serve God and fellow the authority of the Roman Catholic Church. The power of the Roman Catholic Church was the greatest when the cathedrals were built and from birth to death middle ages, population were dominated by the church. The weakest Roman Catholic Popes in my opinion were is Pope Leo X who sold indulgence for
Response Paper 5: Religious Reform Since the fall of the Roman empire, the Catholic church had a reputation for being stable. This gave people a sense of security and made them believe that whatever the Catholic church did, was what God wanted done. Then, in 1378 the Catholic church had three popes, because its rulers were so despite for power, that neither one of them refused to give up the papacy. This greed slowly trickled down to every level of the Catholic church.
Religion and its various ideologies played a key role in advancing the authority of the Ottoman and Catholic Europe; it also influenced the way they confronted outside powers and people from other religions. The Ottomans where an Islamic ruled empire which brought about a certain ideology that gave them the God given rights to the earth. Catholic Europe also had this ideology from where God gave Peter the keys to the kingdom of heaven and endowed upon them earth as well (Matt 16: 19). The catholic church in Europe seemed to have their hands in the cookie jar of European Medieval Government and some what controlled the kings and nobles.
The Pope and the Priest were corrupt and brutal. They neglected their people and took an intense interest in politics. Many critiqued the church on its clerical immortality, clerical ignorance, and clerical pluralism with also the problem of absenteeism. This meant that the papacy stayed away from their duties without a good reason. King Henry VIII’s chancellor Thomas Wolsey didn’t step foot in his diocese until fifteen years after.
1. The Reformation was a period where men like Martin Luther challenged the teachings and authority of the Roman Catholic Church. However, before the Reformation, the Church had to deal with problems such as the Sack of Rome. In 1527, Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, had his own troops come against the city of Rome, take the city over, and imprison Pope Clement VII. While the Church was trying to deal with outer conflicts, there was a problem that was rising from within.
The speech of Urban II at Clermont in 1095 was the special moment, when he promised and guaranteed that any person who will join to the campaign would get Holy land and place in heaven. At that time believe in God and Holy land was very popular, so Urban II mostly affected on moral of the people. The effect was stunning; people from all parts of Western Europe started to think that moving to Jerusalem is their duty. Actually the main purpose of Urban II was to unite all Christians in Europe and to achieve his aim completely he reminded people that their lands are poor, while Muslims live in Holy lands under good conditions. Citizens were now strongly motivated and ready to invade irreligious opponents.
Pope Urban II’s speech at Clermont in 1095 was a call to crusade given outdoors to the nobles, commoners and church leaders of the Western European Christians (the Franks). The people were moved by this speech and it changed history, launching the first crusade to capture Jerusalem from the Muslim Turks. After hearing Pope Urban II’s speech, thousands of Western European Christians were moved to embark on the dangerous journey and fight in the crusade. I believe the main reasons they were moved and persuaded to fight was; 1) they felt it was their Christian duty, 2) Pope Urban promised them absolution for their sins and 3) they felt compelled to defend Christianity, their holy land and the Eastern Christians.
Constantine the Great is one of the most prominent figures of the ancient world who has dramatically influenced the history of the modern world. Constantine’s triumph of political dominance of his time, led to the success of Christianity rising as the dominant religion in the Roman word, and perhaps the modern world. Constantine was the son of Helena and Constantius. In 289 AD, the western emperor chose Constantius to serve him. Constantius and Galerius were promoted to Caesar and eventually to Augusti.
Fulcher's claim that European Christians should have been protected from Muslim occupation and fierce persecution. As the Roman Realm disintegrated and the papacy lost power and power, moves in governmental issues and religions started. The papacy, under the direction of Pope Urban II, started the battle for more power and power. Amid the time preceding the Main Campaign, the Christian confidence "overwhelmed and directed regular day to day existence to a degree that can appear to be practically unfathomable to a present day eyewitness receptive to the states of mind and biases progressively secularized contemporary society. This religious enthusiasm sustained the "mind-boggling uneasiness: the threat of wrongdoing".
In the year 1054, the Catholic Church had issues within the different parts of it. As these issues continued to pose a bigger problem, the church finally decided that it needed to separate and become different churches so that they could each conduct and run the church like they wanted to. The two branches of the Catholic Church that were feuding around this time were the Latin portion of the church, later known as Roman Catholics, and the Greek part, which were eventually known as the Orthodox Church. As we take a look back at these two branches of the Catholic Church, the differences and problems that they had with one another will be shown by evidence found in documents relating to the incidents and troubles that caused the church to have
The Christian View vs. The Muslim View of the Crusades The crusades were a set of different military actions that were sanctioned by the Catholic Church and the papacy. Their intention was to recapture Holy Lands they believed were rightfully theirs from the Muslim people that had invaded it. As any attack on a large group of people would do, every major group was affected. The Christians had their own reasons and beliefs for going on these Crusades.
In spite of that time-frame, the relations between the Middle-Age Empires and the Roman Catholic Church prior to the
Relationships between Christianity, Islam, and Judaism were worsened, and the Pope lost a great deal of his power during the Crusades. European politics were shifted dramatically from feudalism to large towns and cities with bustling trade. Monarchs ruled the beginnings of modern European countries. People learned about other cultures and expanded their views of the world because of the effects of the Crusades. A large amount of crucial progress was made in medieval Europe as a result of the Crusades, and the battles fought over Jerusalem created ripples that still show in European countries to this
This strong disagreement among Catholics led them to reform the church. The Renaissance influenced people to believe that the church was no longer the
The general principle that governed to replace the authority of the pope was on the formation of representative church council, while representative parliament in order to replace the power of the king. The decree of Constance which is consider as the most revolutionary document in history in which it lead up to the effort to replace the Roman ideals of authority. The great schism that split the west and east church together serve as an opportunity for the liberal churchmen to assert the theory of limited monarchy as the best in both the church and state. When general welfare was at stake the resistance to pope and king are justifiably; which is based on the utilitarian doctrine. Further more, the pope can be depose if he did not obey the law of nature or become incompetent to the position in which the temporal ruler can call the church council to depose the