A city council meeting is a regular meeting where the Mayor of a city, District Attorney, and other important leaders of the community, along with members the general public meet to discuss important issues. They can bring up their concerns or questions of a specific topic, they can bring awareness to an issue, while making proposals and ordinances to better the community in which they live. And this is exactly what took place in Redding, California on October 20th 2015.
I was not sure what to expect, when I started watching this meeting because I have never watched or attended a city council meeting. However, I was surprised by how fast an hour and half meeting actually went, and how much they covered in that short amount of time. This meeting
…show more content…
Shopping cart theft is a huge problem that not only the city of Redding is experiences, but the surrounding areas as well. They members of the community, and board members, are getting tired of seeing shopping carts that have been taken off of store premises without permission, being left on the side of the road, in ditches, and in random places. Therefore, they are working on passing an ordinances in which the stores are responsible to label their carts, and figure out cart containment. And then when unauthorized individuals are found with carts they then could be brought up on theft charges. Which would lead to the shopping carts being impounded for the stores to pick up. In this shopping cart discussion they had a speaker come up because he felt a few words in the written proposal needed rephrased. It showed me how such little words such as it meeting "shall" or "may" or even the use of the word “customer” over “unauthorized individual” can make a huge difference in the meaning of such a law and ordnance. This is something they want to implement, with a review at the 12 month mark to discuss and make changes if they need to. Once they voted and it was voted to pass, the District Attorney read this ordinance in. I personally think this is a great idea. I know when I am driving down certain parts of town there are carts everywhere, and it looks horrible. And I …show more content…
Underage drinking and partying is another big issue for the city of Redding, and is a problem they are taking very seriously. They discussed a strict liability. This would mean that if the act of underage drinking or partying in which alcohol is involved, and it occurs on your property, whether you are aware of it or not, you are liable and could be brought up on charges for it. However, this strict policy would come with some pros and cons. Yes, it would make it easy for the prosecution because they wouldn’t have to provide proof that the property owners knew what happened. However, a negative would be that if a parent did everything they could, and let’s say went out of town and their kid was supposed to stay with a relative, but snuck away and had a party at their parents’ house anyways, that parent would still be found liable for it. Which doesn’t seem fair. So they also brought up that a clause should be in about prosecution discretion in cases such as these. Which would make a huge difference in whether they decided to take someone to court, or let them go with just a warning. Another point they brought up under this section is that public awareness would be key for this clause, so they could not say they did not know about it. They could make it a criminal or civil case for those individuals found guilty of providing alcohol to minors and facilitating their parties. However, after their
The problem, however, is the effect the revitalization has on the homeless community. The project is already underway; new “trendy” stores have been built alongside the luxury high rises located near the waterfront. While this improvement should be happily received by residents, one must question what will happen to the current residents and, more importantly, the homeless population that rely on establishments that have been around for decades. This change
Robert Voas states teen pregnancy, sexual assaults, and crime rates have increased due to underage drinking. Alcohol consumption at a college age leads to 600,000 physical assaults and 70,000 sexual assaults yearly according to a study (464). Joyce Alcantara claims if the age were lowered back to eighteen then it would put younger teens at risk (468). People tend to have friends around their same age. So, if eighteen year olds were allowed to drink then their friends which are roughly around the age of sixteen or seventeen would likely have an alcoholic drink in their hand as well.
But for now, the California law prohibits anyone under 21 to be in possession of alcohol in a public place, it is legal for 18-20 year olds to consume alcohol on private property with supervision.
The court rejected that allegation and said that the test for determining whether or not the law violates substantive due process involves when “it bears a reasonable relationship to a permissive legislative objective and is not discriminatory, arbitrary, or oppressive.” Consequently, the court supports that the Act was created in order to avoid further Acts of crime enacted by reoffenders by making sure that they will receive and serve the maximum and the entire sentence under the law. Therefore, the court concluded that the argument fails due to the responsibilities of the trial courts to just adjudge a minimum mandatory
This specific policy requires the monitoring and over policing of urban environments to prevent small crimes, which often leads to the stop and frisking of individuals. People living in the 77th Cromwell Towers public housing unit, as mentioned in The House I Live In, were experiencing this and being arrested for possessing
This law changed to 21 because all states would “lose a certain percentage of federal highway dollars” (“Frequently Asked”). Not only that but the rates of excessive drinking went up, along with drunk driving. Driving alone is hard enough, especially if the person is a new driver, but add alcohol and there is a very deadly mix. Being able to legally drink at the age of “21 decreased the number of fatal traffic accidents for 18- to 20-year-olds by 13% and saved approximately 27,052 lives from 1975-2008” (“Should the Drinking Age”). Since there have been less drunk driving accidents when the minimum age for drinking changed to 21, it is a safer environment if the drinking age is left at 21 instead of being
In 2005 a tragedy struck my hometown of Cameron Wisconsin. Following the annual homecoming parade, the high schoolers were driving back to the school to cheer on the football team for the game that night. Sitting on the toolboxes in one of the trucks was Bailey Zimmerman and her good friend Jasmyn Becker. As their driver, Matthew Stoyke, was making the turn into the parking lot, he saw a bunch of his friends already waiting for him. Without thinking, Matthew slammed his foot onto the accelerator to show off for his buddies.
Keep the drinking age as is, there is no need to expose young adults to something so
The first and most used of the three arguments is that it could reduce or even eliminate unsafe drinking activities. One of the most dangerous times for drinking in the United States is between the ages of 18 - 20. Once a person reaches the age of 18, he or she gains all of his or her legal adult rights, except the right to drink. By allowing supervised drinking ability for those in the age bracket of 18 - 20, it could reduce or even eliminate risky drinking behaviors that can lead to bad decisions. Besides, it has not stopped teen drinking, and it probably never will.
Frat parties, for example, serve booze, often, if not always, without the supervision of a responsible adult (aka an adult over the age of 21). Lowering the drinking age to 18 can be beneficial in that responsible drinking can be taught before the student turns 21. My favorite analogy, by Huffington Post writer, Elizabeth Glass Geltman, says, “We don’t have students teach each other how to drive, why is alcohol different?” In her article on Huffington Post, she talks about her college experience in the 70s and early 80s, where the legal drinking age in the US was 18. She talks about how drinking was legal for most students in her senior year of high school and in college, and that beer was commonly served at dances, proms, graduation events, etc.
People will oppose to this law, but at the age of 18 an adolescent's brain is not fully developed yet. Underage drinking is a common action in today’s society. What kids do not know is the effect that underage drinking has on their brain. Since the brain is not fully developed at the age of 18, drinking
The supervisors approved to purchase a warehouse in Anaheim, which will be used as a year-round shelter for the homeless. “ It’s the latest effort in a series of failed attempts, to open a year-around shelter” (source: The Orange County Register). The neighbors in Anaheim are not in a favor of opening a shelter home in Anaheim as the neighbors rally to reject the offer. The chairman also shows his anger by saying “forget it” as the city people are against them around bringing a shelter in the city (source: The Orange County Register). The state should also with the county leaders share an action around these homeless people who are on the increasing scale.
In the years leading up to the American Revolution, there was a tense relationship between the colonists and their British rulers. Large gatherings in the colonies to discuss the grievances caused by the actions of the British were common. Patrick Henry applies the rhetorical strategies of allusions and repetition in his “Speech in the Virginia Convention” to assert that the colonists should believe fighting for their freedom and rights is necessary and that they must fight as soon as possible. Although Henry has rather radical beliefs in comparison to the other members of the Convention, he connects with them through religious and literary allusions that are able to convince them of his assertions. In his speech, Henry alludes to
It seemed to work smoothly and efficiently but it was a bit confusing for me as I have never attended a city council meeting before. It was difficult to keep up with what they were saying and the topics they were going over since I had no previous knowledge of them. Thankfully the meeting was recorded so I could go over it a few times and figure out what they were saying. I recognize the difference now to if you are in the the meeting versus being an observer. I feel like it isn’t very easier for an outsider to state their thoughts if they are uninformed, or misinformed, of what’s going on.
“ [The drinking age] is unfavorable because it forces youth to consume alcohol in unsupervised places that are risky and consumption may be abused.” The idea is, if the drinking age is lowered, youth will be able to drink in open, public places that can be supervised by others. By being public, it would decrease the risky behavior seen with alcohol in private, unsupervised settings. Pomata also asserts, “The age restriction inspires undesirable activities just as the National Prohibition Act did.” Some undesirable activities that are associated with underage drinking include the making and distributing of fake ID’s.