A true patriot are the ones who oppose, the ones who don’t just go along, those who follows truth and righteousness and try to pass it along to the society. This can apply in today society from the protest against Donald Trump to impeach him from office. The people feel as President Trump isn’t doing an efficient job with the
Yes These arguments where very strong, and I found it very interesting that this group used current UN legislation to prove their point. The idea that we cannot rely on the private sector to regulate themselves I think is really important because people will act upon their own self interest and encouraging people to change their mindset is not strong enough of a solution. Susan Banesh’s argument of counter speech sounds effective in theory but we cannot rely on the population to remove counter speech.If the public does not already inject enough counter speech, educating them with statistics on its effectiveness will not motivate enough people to make lasting change. Because of this point, I am not confident that the proposed educational sessions
A big reason different from Gandhi and Thoreau, is Thoreau talks about his opinion on the government and laws. Thoreau mostly talks how he wants to fight back against the laws that are not right. Gandhi is speaking to everyone and how to change things. Gandhi is trying to change by not creating violence. Gandhi believed in peaceful protest to gain access to having freedom.
But there are also those who are displeased with the results, and who are currently exercising their right to protest in public. Those are the ones who are strong, and fearless enough, to go out into the world and protest against their government. They are the ones who do not sit around and allow others to “remedy the evil” for them. They are the ones who exercise their “Moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”. And best of all, these are the people that know that one must fight for their own rights, for they will not be willingly granted to them.
In The Prince it states “Should be feared rather than loved "if you cannot be both" in order to avoid a revolt;” (The Prince) explains that not all leaders are admired and followed by the citizens. What determines the differences of a good leader to a bad leader is just a minor change. It is just if a leader could look broadly into the world. Same with illegal immigration problem, the leader of the country should take care of the people who is benefitting from the country without any contributions, and the husband of one’s daughter. A good leader doesn’t give any excuses to which ever points made on the nation, a real leader should have a resolute opinion about how will the nation is going to be ruled.
If the voting system wasn't anonymous i'm sure the election would have been different. This is the opposite of what was needed for the fight for equality. We now have a leader that is against the fight for equality, and the worst part about it is that he doesn't think he is a racist. This is related to the American Law assignment that I had to do, no one thinks they are prejudice they just
The salt march was a march of the Indian people intended to end the purchase of salt from the British. The salt march was indeed an example of Gandhi leading people non violently. The march was a success, and the people used nonviolence to do it. Gandhi was an incredible and an inspiration on lots of people all around the world including civil rights
Since the words are written and are permanent?. Or, should we continue to censor things like people’s voices as well like how it is on tv. Do we allow for the government to have that power?. Or in fear of having your right to free speech being compromised do we let society have the power to control what is and is not considered to be acceptable?. This is an extremely controversial case just for that reason.
So, its depends on the circumstances. Profiling does takes place but under some valid reason. Without a valid reason the profiling is actually violating an individual’s Civil right as well as liberties. In my opinion Civil Rights and Civil Liberties are always the most important aspect in every individual’s life. So, I think that the government should always be there to protect their citizens from any danger hindering their
People will criticize and be envious of them because they are seen as a separate group. •Representatives should not be suspected of any dishonesty or disloyalty, or they will be deemed unworthy. •The government should not be governed by force. If it is, it will lead to destruction. “If this system was so framed as to command that respect from the people, which every good free government will obtain, this provision was unnecessary” (Brutus 4).