Is Civil Disobedience Really a Disturbance, or a Call for Change?
Civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. once said that “one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”, indicating several things: one, moral is more important than the surrounding rules, two, the laws of the government may not always be just and three, to not be afraid of going against what is seemingly right in order to make a difference in the world. Many people in the past have stressed the importance of civil disobedience, such as King, Henry David Thoreau and Arthur Miller in his book The Crucible. In King’s “A Letter from Birmingham Jail”, there is an emotional appeal to the clergymen to join him in his act for equality, after he was thrown in jail for parading
…show more content…
King, Thoreau and Miller demonstrate that civil disobedience can occur in different ways, but for the society’s greater good by spreading awareness of the real issues that need to be addressed, and to encourage people to rethink …show more content…
The Socratic Method also encourages debating commonly accepted viewpoints and embracing the grayness of beliefs. When King mentions the “nonviolent gadflies”, he is referring to a court case involving Socrates declaring that in political terms, gadflies stung, or rallied people to see the truth. By comparing himself, and those with him in the march, to the “nonviolent gadflies,” King establishes that there is a necessary need for civil disobedience to bring about awareness regarding inequality that had to be sparked in people through his speeches and marches. Moreover, King labels prejudice and beliefs that the black people are subordinates as “myths and half-truths” and urges the clergymen to notice and join them in an attempt to combat the racism that
Henry David Thoreau’s essay, Civil Disobedience, goes deeply into the presence of unjust laws, and what can be done to combat these in the growing and rising United States. In the section of the essay which begins with “Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them…”; David Thoreau has a valid point in the need to make changes through persuasion, if at all possible, and it not, by force. Some people may think of using force to change laws as rebellious and unpatriotic, but if the laws are unjust to begin with, may it be of the people’s interest to do something about it? Thoreau put emphasis on citizen participation in the government- without citizen participation, he paints a picture of tyranny and unguided power within the nation’s government.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was placed in Birmingham Jail in the 1960’s. During his time there, King wrote his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” after an open letter that was given to the public saying that the fellow clergymen were criticizing and saying that his present activities were “unwise and untimely.” King answers these charges in a careful crafted analysis by stating the opposing argument, and then contrasting it with his own argument. Henry David Thoreau wrote “Civil Disobedience” it exposes the mind to the idea of prioritizing laws. Refusing to obey the laws and demands of government, it criticizes the American institution of government at the time and is also defined as a text to live by.
f one followed the similarities of King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience," they would notice that King may have been somewhat influenced by Thoreau's essay. The two essays also have many differences that are evident throughout analysis of the two essays that divide individual interpretation of each text. But it is obvious that the overall purpose of these two essays is to persuade the audiences that civil disobedience is necessary if there is social injustice in the government that governs over people.
“Unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them” (Thoreau 945, par.16). Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had written about resisting an unjust government in his piece, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. In his essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau also discusses the right and responsibility to resist an unjust government. Since King and Thoreau both use current events in their time as examples of injustice, use historical and biblical references, how they can’t wait any longer to make a change, both provide strong arguments on how important it is to stand up against the injustice put upon American people by the government; however, King and Thoreau were inspired to write by different causes
Acting civil, but disobedient, is a way to non-violently protest things you believe to be unfair. Henry David Thoreau wrote an essay called “Civil Disobedience” which has been used by many such as Martin Luther King Jr. to help fight injustice. King was a pastor and renowned speaker who headed the Civil Rights movement. Dr. King's “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was based on concepts he read in Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”. While both writers discuss ways to be civil yet disobedient, they convince the readers in opposite ways.
In his essay “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau asserts that the government is not needed and must be disobeyed for the sake of the people. Over a hundred years later after Thoreau published his essay, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” similarly shows the need for the disobeyment of the government. Thoreau asserts that governments are not necessary, and must be dissolved. While King follows a similar ideal, he believes that the government is inherently good, but that some of the laws passed by the government are cruel to people. While they are both appealing emotionally and ethically, King’s is more sound in argument and portrays a more practical way of civil disobedience.
"Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr. and "Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau are two influential essays that advocate civil disobedience as a way to address social injustices. Despite being written in different historical contexts, both essays share common themes of nonviolent resistance and the pursuit of justice. This essay aims to compare and contrast the two essays, examining their historical contexts, purposes, persuasive techniques, approaches to civil disobedience, and impact on the discourse of social change. "Civil Disobedience" was written in 1849 during a time when Thoreau opposed slavery and the Mexican-American War. His essay focuses on individual resistance to an unjust government.
In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s essay, “Letter From a Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau essay “Civil Disobedience,” both share their opinions on social injustice and civil disobedience. They both believe that people can protest unfair and unjust laws imposed on them in a civil way. In addition, King and Thoreau are challenging the government with their essays, which they wrote after they got sent to jail. For protesting the treatment of blacks in Birmingham, Alabama, King spent eleven days in jail; Thoreau spent a night in jail for refusing to pay his poll tax. Both King and Thoreau’s essays present similar plans for a resolution.
People could portray anything in different ways. Thoreau and King both have differences in portraying civil disobedience. In Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” he begins writing about how the government rarely shows how powerful it is and instead acquires power from the people. King used civil disobedience as a means of effectuating government change and used his courage to protest against discrimination through the act of civil disobedience.
2. Explain the limits, ethical problems involved with, and successes of civil disobedience. Give specific examples from the Great Depression era, the Civil Rights Movement, and contemporary movements (something from the 1980s to the present) that we discussed and read about in class. Also, explain how civil disobedience reflects the relation between morality and the law. •Ethical problems with civil disobedience: Civil disobedience can be a universal concept, in other words, civil disobedience is understood by all; however, civil disobedience has been corrupted and has also been used for hope, risks, and action-good and bad.
Speaker: The speaker of “Civil Disobedience” is Henry David Thoreau, who was one of the most influential transcendentalists of his time. Thoreau was a inverate abolitionist, as well as a naturalist, which is evident in one of his most widely recognized works Walden. Thoreau believed that all men should be equal, notice I said men, and that we need to go back to our naturalistic roots/ characteristics. Even though he lived in a time we now consider as generally simplistic we also need to take into account that he also was living through the time of mass industrialization. Occasion: “Civil Disobedience” was originally part of a series of lectures that Thoreau gave at the Concord Lyceum in 1848.The lyceum movement was multiple organizations sponsoring communal programs, which thrived before and after the Civil War.
Despite the fact that acts of civil disobedience may be harmful when isolated or disorderly, they can produce significant, positive effects when occurring in an organized series. Civil disobedience can accomplish a goal, but only when conducted in a repeated, orderly manner. Otherwise, the consequences of acting solely or destructively would outweigh benefit; rebellious actions will not gain the government’s consideration if they cause severe disruption in the public. Antigone 's action of burying her brother was explicitly illegal, but she performed it anyway. When caught, she pleads to Creon, "I beg you: kill me" (Fitts and Fitzgerald 210).
People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
The city is a very busy and hectic place with heavy traffic. Navigating the city and watching for cars is frightening, but lacking the ability to see and having to trust someone else to help you cross the street is even scarier. Blind people who live in the city experience this everyday and must rely on their service dogs to get them safely to their destination. The service dog must first learn to obey their owners commands in order to lead them to their destination. The dog is then taught to disobey harmful commands such as stopping their owner from walking through a red light.