Civil disobedience is a refusal to obey a law or non-payment of taxes. Many of them like Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi has disobey the laws and changed the world. Although some may argue that civil disobedience cannot be justified as a democracy, I assert that it can be justified as a democracy because unjust laws are made by a democratic legislatures and also can be changed by a democratic legislatures. Civil disobedience in a democracy is justified as morally. It is refusal to obey government law and act as non-violent. “Individualism gave him another answer; individual are sovereign, especially in a democracy and the government only holds its power by delegation from free individuals”(Suber). Civil disobedience in a democratic …show more content…
It shows that we are democracy because a people has the ability to challange the government. “If the is an individual law which restricts the liberty of a specific group from voting based on their ethnic background, then this will clearly violate one of the fundamental principles of justice.”(Grant). For example, if government has created the laws about the traffic system than they can change it. A person can disobey the law because you have your autonomy. “If disobedience is justified for one group whose moral belief condemn the law, then it is justified for any group similarly situated, which is a recipe for anarchy”(Suber). This means that disobedience is only for one group whose moral belief support the law than it is justified for any group, Anarchy is not a bad, but it is ideal form for society. For example, If we face any wrong law, they may disobey and risk anarchy the authority, in order to endure the disposition toward the greater evil of …show more content…
“If the maxim of the action is “disobey a law whenever you disapprove of it,” but it can succeed if instead the maxim is, “disobey the when obedience would cause more harm than disobedience,” or “disobey the law when is unjust in the following specific way..”(Suber). This means that if you disobey the law when it is disapprove it is gonna harm you and you should disobey when obeying the law cause more harm. For example, he recommended disobedience of unjust laws and obedience to the just, he would be regard as public we help us identify the unjust laws which may or must be disobeyed. “ A key factor which distinguishes evil disobedience from protest is the brute fact that the actions undertaken are illegal.”(Grant). For example, a person can break the law for there own protection or any kind of safety. Breaking a law is not crime it is just for your protection or the country freedom or any kind of things related to
Civil disobedience is not only the breaking of a law, but also defiance of moral code. In the famous play, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare , the story depicts two lovers in Verona, Italy who are torn apart by a feud that forces them to meet their end. Holding their grudge, the Montagues and Capulets express too much pride to let the feud go. The downfall of the couple is caused by a chain of reaction of broken rules and ultimately results in the tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet.
In Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, Thoreau attempts to persuade citizens to deliberately disobey and isolate themselves from the government. Thoreau creates a metaphor where injustice impacts a government machine. First, he writes that citizens can let the government or machine try to fix itself or try to find the injustice within itself, “…but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine” (Thoreau, 1847, p. 134). Thoreau identifies that ultimately if citizens want change from injustice, citizens must disobey.
Martin Luther King Jr once stated, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” in his Letter from Birmingham Jail in 1963. He was invoking the principle of civil disobedience. He wasn't justifying breaking laws just because, but instead, meant that you break the law and accept your punishment, in hopes that people will come to see that the law is unethical. Civil disobedience plays an important role in how our society has been shaped up until this point.
He explains civil disobedience as “that it is more important to develop respect for the right, rather than a respect for the law, for people’s obligations are to do what's right”. There are many different people who show civil disobedience in
My Standpoint Civil Disobedience is an effective method of change that has been used throughout history against unjust laws. “Antigone” The story of “Antigone” uses this idea of civil disobedience through Antigone who defies the law given by her new king. As Creon starts off his first day of work he is emotional due to the loss of his eldest son. Because Creon is so emotional, he states that the person who brought war to the land causing his eldest son’s death, shall not be buried.
Civil Disobedience In the dictionary civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest, but Thoreau and Martin Luther King have their own beliefs to civil disobedience. In Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” he writes about the need to prioritize one’s conscience over the dictates of laws. Martin Luther King uses civil disobedience as something that effectuates change in the government. Both Thoreau and Martin Luther King has similar yet different perspectives on civil disobedience.
When civil disobedience is practiced individually it is hard, because what is moral to one
Civil disobedience is one of our rights as citizens of the United States of America. When a law is passed that we, as citizens, believe goes against our Constitutional freedoms, we have the right, if not the obligation to protest it. Asia-Pacific Economics Blog states many benefits of peaceful protest. Civil disobedience is a legal tool we have the right to exercise to gain the attention of the government, stating that, as a group, the law that has been passed has not been found to be in our best interest. Civil disobedience his the benefits of showing a point publicly, showing the government how many are supporting the cause.
Some people might think of destruction or immorality when the words “civil disobedience” come up, but in reality, it’s quite the opposite. Many times in the past, civil disobedience has lead to social reform and building up a better future. It’s a form of resistance that commonly centers on a person’s morals as it’s basis. It’s a powerful tool in protests that has been used many times in the past and continues to be utilized today. Civil disobedience and breaking the law to some extent go hand in hand, which brings up the question, is it justifiable?
King qualify the idea of being against the government when it becomes corrupted to guide humanity to a brighter path. Described by Thoreau, civilians are encouraged not to let governments overrule by putting morals ahead of unjust laws. If governments did overrule and people refuse to disobey, the outcomes of letting unjust laws exist would be worse than evil. Thus, civilians need to civilly disobedient during these situations when unjust laws exist but if people are too fearful to act “until they have persuaded the majority… the fault of the government itself” would create a remedy worse than evil (Thoreau 9). Unjust laws need to be transgressed by the citizens in order to create an enlightened state, one that recognizes the higher more independent power of an individual.
In the Crito by Plato, Socrates argues against civil disobedience, seeing it as an unjust act. Contrasting this view, Martin Luther King argues for civil disobedience against unjust laws, and seeing it as a responsibility of citizens. Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain law, commands or requests of the government. I will argue that the view of Socrates is superior to the view of Martin Luther King on the justness of civil disobedience. Using the argument against harm, I will show that even if a law is viewed as unjust, you must not repay an evil with another evil, as evident in the Crito while contrary to ideas presented by MLK.
Plagiarism can be an act of civil disobedience Plagiarism, one of the fundamental issues of academic life, is a basic subject to portray, yet difficult to maintain a strategic distance from. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary: plagiarism is the action of using the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas. As defined previously, plagiarism is only taking someone else work without giving credits. I believe plagiarism cannot be an act of civil disobedience because it is not a political act and does not envision a change in the law or policies in the government. What is a civil disobedience?
Herbert J. Storing, an Associate Professor of Political Science, in “The Case Against Civil Disobedience,” writes, “One of the practical consequences of this institution [civil disobedience] is to divert disobedience and even revolution into the channel of law” (97). What Storing is saying is that civil disobedience will encourage people to break the laws and they will hide under civil disobedience to avoid the law. Also, civil disobedience might split society by creating disagreements with the people, and it could create a political instability. However, Storing fails to see that those who break an unjust law, as discussed above, do not avoid the law, in fact they show respect to the law as they willingly accept the consequences. By accepting the consequences, they show that they are not acting for their own interests but for society’s.
Civil disobedience is nonviolent resistance to a government’s law in seek of change. Civil disobedience is an effective way to bring about change because it is a harmless way of fighting an unjust law or idea, it can educate people about the cause, and it has been successful many times in history. First and foremost, civil disobedience is
One reason is if you obey an unjust law, then you are unjust yourself. This is invalid given that disobeying any law makes you unjust. Also, Socrates explains to Crito that what the majority thinks “cannot make a man either wise or foolish, but they inflict things haphazardly” (Crito 47). What the majority thinks is not always the right thing. People are influenced by others who disobey the law which can eventually lead up to anarchy, so why would you want to disobey a law?