Civil Liberties And Civil Liberties Vs. Civil Rights

is civil right, and the first amendment which says that government cannot establish America as any religious country is civil liberty. 2 So basically, civil rights protect people from discrimination while civil liberties protect the people from power of government. There are many amendments in the constitution developed by supreme courts that secure the civil rights and liberties of the people; among 27 amendments of the constitution,

Civil liberties combine freedoms and protections like due process of law and the right to free speech. On the other hand, civil rights prohibit discrimination under the law on the basis of race, gender, disability status, or other demographic characteristics. While both civil rights and civil liberties take up important places in American politics, they emerged along essentially different paths. Since the Framers wrote the constitution the ideas of civil rights have changed greatly. The Fourteenth Amendment specially states that a state could not deny any person within jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.

The government can’t take away what is rightfully yours; the freedom of speech, as stated in the first amendment and Thoreau obviously used that to his greatest and wisest. Thoreau greatly and with heart encouraged the pacifistic protest- because he doesn’t believe in violence and chaos- and also defending civil liberties. Thoreau’s essay although wasn’t really acknowledge at the time, probably due to the outcry of his powerful speech, but it eventually led up to inspiring other inspiring folk’s civil rights

Rights and Responsibility of a U.S Citizen Though people often confuse the rights and responsibilities of a citizen, they are both two different things. According to Brainpop (n. d.) “a right is a freedom that is protected, such as the right to free speech and religion. A responsibility is a duty or something you should do, such as recycling or doing your homework.” The difference can therefore be observed in the fact that the right is something the law protects you with, while the responsibility is something the law requires you to fulfill. The right should not make someone forget that they have responsibilities. If you have the right to live, you cannot go everywhere smoking in the public and causing people heart attacks, and expect to be protect

Freedom of assembly and petition gives every individual the privilege to be anywhere at any time as long as it doesn’t cause violence on public property. All people have the right to practice the freedom but it shouldn’t lead to more problems. Freedom of religion is a major issue in our country today that has became a threat. Two clauses under freedom of religion, “establishment” and “free exercise” isn’t under the freedom until Thomas Jefferson was a president. Some court cases that address the freedom of religion had to deal with

In indicated exercises. Then again, the law does not build human rights. Human rights are innate qualifications which go to each individual as a result Of being human. Settlements and different wellsprings of law for the most part serve To secure formally the privileges of people and gatherings against activities or relinquishment Of activities by governments which meddle with the satisfaction in Their human rights. Global human rights law The formal statement of inborn human rights is through worldwide human Rights law.

A government with more control will be disastrous because the people would have their rights stripped away from the citizens of the the United States. The government cannot infringe on the rights given in the constitution. The 1st amendment is “The freedom of speech, The freedom of religion, and The freedom of expression”. The people are given the right to fly whatever flag they want to fly whether it the gay flag, confederate flag, or any flag. The 2nd amendment is “The right to bear arms”.

This terrorism is usually associated with Muslim groups. As a safety precaution the United States has decided that no Muslims are allowed access into our country. They think that it is a good idea to decrease the possibility of a terrorist attack by just not allowing any Muslims into our country. This could end up ruffling some feathers though, because some might think that this is unfair to them due to excerpt two of the Declaration of Independence. This excerpt states,” We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

There have been many controversies around what people should do during the national anthem. We can still respect our country besides for standing. One of the most important principal in the united states is that we have freedom of speech unless there is a compelling reason to take it away. In fact the first amendment of the constitution states that in stipulations can not make rules that quote “abridge the freedom of speech.” This is implies that though we have been standing for the national anthem there is no rule or law saying that we can not do anything else during the national anthem and people are the only limitations from stopping people from doing what they want so whos to say we can only respect our country one way. We should be able to respect our country in many multiple ways and however we want to as long as it is some form of respect.

The constitution states that “...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. (US Const. amend.II) The right to bear arms is just as important as the right to free speech. The second amendment was put in the Constitution for a reason, and no one has the right to take away any of the rights given to the people by the United States Constitution. The moment the right to bear arms gets taken away, the government has free reign to take away more rights.The second amendment was not just meant for the people to just own firearms.

Civil liberties are freedoms stated in the Bill of rights that protect the people from unreasonable government interference while Civil rights guarantees protection by the government to protect an individual from another. When the Bills of Rights was made it was not created as a list of guaranteed rights for citizens but simply made to state what things the government was not allowed to interfere with (Steve Mount).Although some may say that the U.S constitution did not need to include a specific listing of civil rights and liberties because it was unnecessary, I would have to disagree. The Bill of Rights is in my opinion not specific enough to protect the rights of the people the way it should. It simply just states what cannot be interfered

The second section is referred to as the Free Exercise Clause, since that 's exactly what it guarantees: you are allowed to practice any kind of religion you want, without interference from the government. This is what we might call a positive right, since it allows you to do something, rather than keeping you from doing it. Like all rights, of course, this comes with some conditions, among them being that the exercise of your religion can 't interfere with or prohibit the rights of other individuals. The Establishment Clause is a little different, and more encompassing. This is a negative right, since it prohibits something rather than entitles it.

According to the Constitution, people can’t be stripped from their inalienable rights which are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Despite the implement of the Constitution, “freedom” was defined differently in the 1980s than it was in the 20th century. Back in the 1980s, “freedom” was still not seen as a right to all people due to some of the laws such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act” that were implemented to go against the Constitution. While, in the 20th century, “freedom” was viewed as a right since “freedom” was offered to every people no matter what their race, their color of the skin, their religion, and their sexuality. For example, former president Barack Obama was able to make same-sex marriage legal, lifted the restriction on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” barred employers for firing their employees for being either transgender or having a different sexuality, allowed everyone to have universal access to ObamaCare, and had a diversified cabinet that helped Obama make tough decisions to make America the most affluent and strongest country in the world. As a result, Mr. Rawls was able to define “freedom” and “opportunities” in the same sentence since these aspects are the “harbinger of the American future” (Rawls, pg.

Congress, trying to not make the same mistakes as Britain, wrote that all people could protest peacefully without any violent recompense, and that they had the freedom to do so. They said, in Amendment 1 of the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (U.S. Cong.). This not only meant that Congress gave rights to the people to protest their issues, but also gave them freedom of speech, press, and the ability to petition the government, much as they tried to petition with Britain with their grievances. The colonists lastly complained about the presence of a standing army in the colonies, and petitioned Britain as

They stop the national government from interfering with the essential rights and civil liberties of citizens and they also accentuate how limited the national government’s power is. For instance, Amendment I guarantees the freedom of religion, Freedom of speech where the government cannot interfere with people’s personal beliefs. Another common amendment today is the 5th amendment which gives people the right to choose not to testify in court if they feel their own testimony will incriminate them, it also protects citizens from being subject to criminal prosecution and punishment without due process and protects people from being tried for the same case twice. Government’s power is limited through the bill of rights through the 3rd amendment which requires the owner’s consent when it comes to housing troops in their private homes which was something that was problematic during the American Revolutionary war. The Bill of Rights were added to the constitution due to the fact that citizens were unhappy because the constitution did not list the basic civil liberties of citizen’s and their individual freedoms.