ipl-logo

Civil Rights Movement: Martin Luther King Jr.

452 Words2 Pages

The leader whose methods were most effective during the civil rights movement was Martin Luther King Jr. His main goal during the civil rights movement was to have the whites and the blacks all come together to form equality. He fought for this equality through a nonviolent approach, which granted him respect from different races all over the world. Nonviolence also allowed the African Americans to achieve their goal. Nonviolent marches, sit-ins, and protests all had a huge impact in having Kennedy making a civil rights bill. This strategy would lead to creating peace and having all Americans live in harmony. This was the opposite of Malcolm X’s strategy, which was to inflict violence when necessary. King explains that ¨Violence, even in self- …show more content…

Malcolm X on the other hand did not want an integrated society. Instead, we wanted the white Americans to stop being in control of what they do. He stated “in this country, political oppression at the hands of the white man, economic exploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man”. He thinks that this will allow the Blacks to be respected, but this would have instead caused a loss in communication between the two groups and more problems to erupt. For example, two groups will think they are superior to the other and lots of competition would form. Malcolm did on the other hand create pride for African Americans, but his methods would have never created the racial equality we have today. King states “What is needed is a strategy for change, a tactical program which will bring the Negro into the mainstream of American life as quickly as possible. So far, this has only been offered by the nonviolent movement”. He explains that nonviolence is the quickest way to change the lives of many Americans. King showed people that in order to achieve your goals, you will have to work for it in a righteous way, even though it is much simpler to take the easy way out by using violence. Without Martin Luther King Jr.’s peaceful wisdom, Americans, regardless of their diversities, would not be experiencing many of the freedoms we have today. As one may see, King was true leader of the civil rights

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr

    1455 Words  | 6 Pages

    Malcolm X believed that black people must no longer view themselves through white lenses since black people will never value themselves as long as they subscribe to a standard of valuation that devalues them

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Book Report

    971 Words  | 4 Pages

    Organized into six topical groups, the author did an excellent job in comparing and contrasting King and Malcolm’s views on subjects including integration, the American dream, means of struggle, and opposing racial philosophies that needless any improvement. An interpretive introductory essay, chronology, bibliography, document headnotes, and questions for consideration provide further pedagogical support for students. The author explains how Malcolm X came closer than any social reformer in history to embodying and articulating the totality of the African experience in America while Martin Luther King was not only the most important figure in American religious history in the 20th century, he was arguably its most brilliant

    Read More

  • Malcolm's Claim: Improving African Americans

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    Broadly, Malcolm’s main claim is that knowledge of history is very powerful and can help improve African Americans situation. He supports this main claim with four supplementary main ideas. First, black people cannot understand their current situation and change their future without understanding the past and how they got to that point. The second supplementary idea he addressed is that black people need to broaden their scope and understand that their situation isn’t a local problem but touches nationally. He states that African Americas need to understand that they are not the minority nationally and that the era of white people ruling the world has ended.

    Read More

  • 1960s Dbq Analysis

    970 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the American 1960’s there was a Civil Rights Movement. This movement gained a lot of traction within a short amount of time through many people. There were two leaders with opposing tactics but had the same goal reined in the movement. One leader was Martin Luther King with the tactic of Nonviolent Civil Disobedience and integration. The second leader was Malcolm X with the tactic to fight back and to have the communities better themselves by being separate.

    Read More

  • Why We Can T Wait Sparknotes

    1626 Words  | 7 Pages

    It is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals. Both a practical and a moral answer to the Negro’s cry for justice, nonviolent direct action proved that it could win victories without losing wars, and so became the triumphant tactic of the Negro Revolution of 1963” (12). I believe that this paragraph is a perfect way to summarize what King discusses in his book. He emphasized the importance of nonviolence and his belief on it.

    Read More

  • Did Malcolm X's Impact On African American Integration

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    Malcolm says the American Negro is the only person on the planet who is willing to lose his own identity. He later speaks about a televised discussion Martin Luther King was in, and points out that the white man was so proud of his race/culture, that he had no desire to lose it. The man also could not understand why African Americans wanted to lose theirs. Comparing the white mans rational to Dr. Kings, he conceives that black men who support integration, do not value their culture. When referring to people who were advocates of the sit-in movement, he says, “as long as they’re willing to wait for the white man to make up his mind that they are qualified to be respected as human beings, then I am afraid that all of their waiting and planning is for non” (Malcolm).

    Read More

  • Malcolm X's Speech By Any Means Necessary

    780 Words  | 4 Pages

    Malcolm X was an effective leader because he had exceptional communication skills. These skills are viewed in his speech “By Any Means Necessary” and have been analyzed. The main goal of this speech was for blacks to figure out or to begin to figure out, what they can do to change the injustice, in order for blacks to gain things that

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Dbq Analysis

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for

    Read More

  • The Ballot Or The Bullet Essay

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    Malcolm X and his ideals are arguably a representation of the transition from the early 1950 's non-violent movement for integration to a more aggressive black power movement. Evidence of this is shown through powerful strands of his novel “The Ballot or the Bullet” including when he writes, “I don 't mean go out and get violent, but at the same time you should never be non-violent unless you run into some non-violence.” (Malcolm 439). In writing that members of the civil rights movement should never be non-violent he does so facetiously. This excerpt indicates a call for violence as a more powerful method for achieving the equality he feels they deserve.

    Read More

  • Philosophical Differences Between Martin Luther King And Malcolm X

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Speech

    1848 Words  | 8 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. Hence, King’s works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

    1974 Words  | 8 Pages

    However, the action should be taken without nonviolence and with peaceful protest. Dr. King’s nonviolent tactic was a success as it bridged the gap between the colored and white people. Malcolm X was renown for his act of self defense throughout the Civil Rights Movement. His main goal was to prove how whites did not treat black people as human beings. However, through Malcolm X’s several tactics, Martin Luther King’s movement was made more impactful and successful.

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Influence

    559 Words  | 3 Pages

    Malcolm was not a man who believed that the problem of the African Americans would be solved through a peaceful, quiet means and nuances, he believed the problem has graduated through the centuries and has come to a stage when the assertion of African Americans’ existence as humans has to be forcefully done or never. Malcolm’s methods were mainly campaigns and speeches aimed at restoring the dignity of the black man, his confidence in himself and a complete freedom as Americans

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Leadership Style

    1690 Words  | 7 Pages

    Without Malcolm, the White people would have not favored Martin Luther King Jr. over other Civil Rights leaders. Towards the end of Malcolm’s life, Martin Luther King Jr. began to become more like Malcolm in a militant way. Martin Luther king Jr. “was also re-evaluating his presuppositions and was moving toward a greater understanding of Malcolm X, especially regarding black pride, separatism, and White America’s lack of commitment to genuine black equality” (Cone, 1992, p. 256). These transformations of Martin Luther King Jr.’s ideas, likely led him to accomplish the revolution of Civil Rights. Although, this is a possibility, it is extremely unrealistic.

    Read More

More about Civil Rights Movement: Martin Luther King Jr.

Open Document