ipl-logo

Civil War Dbq

677 Words3 Pages

The Civil War broke out due to southern slave states declaring their independence from the United States to form the Confederacy and states that did not was known as the Union. The main reason the Civil War occurred was over the issue of slavery. The debate about the future of slavery led to the south’s secession which led to war between the north and the south. Slavery became an important issue between the North and the South. “When southerners and northerners looked at each other, they no longer saw fellow Americans; they saw enemies. The reason was slavery (381).” Slavery plays different roles for the South and the North. “For many white southerners, the journey from the ideals of the American Revolution led naturally to a Slave Republic: …show more content…

Slavery was another issue for territories, “the West symbolize the hopes and dreams of white American (366).” The South argued that “to exclude slavery from the western territories was to exclude white southerners from pursuing their vision of the American dream (366).” The North disagreed, “they argued that exclusion preserved equality, the equality of all white men and women to live and work without competition from slave labor or rule by despotic slaveholders (366).” In August 1846, David Wilmot offered a bill for the Mexican War, “any territory from the Republic of Mexico… neither slaver nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory (366).” Wilmot explained that he “wanted only to preserve the territories for the sons of toil, of my own race, and own color (366).” The southerners were angry because “it implied that the mere proximity of slavery was degrading and that white southerners were therefore a degraded people, unfit to join other Americans in the territories …show more content…

Free and slave states were kept balanced to keep war from breaking out, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act brought on the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act split Nebraska Territory into Kansas and Nebraska, where Kansas would become a slave state and Nebraska a free state, but leaving the actual decision on slavery to the residents of the territories. Bleeding Kansas occurred because this act led to violence between pro and antislavery forces. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Comprise because “it allowed southerners to bring slaves into an area formerly closed to slavery (373)” causing northerners to feel threatened. Kansas had “both southerners and antislavery northerners began an intensive drive to recruit settlers and establish a majority there (374).” “The unsatisfying Compromise of 1850, “Bleeding Kansas” and “Bleeding Sumner,” the Dread Scott case, and Lecompton convinced many northerners that southerners were conspiring with the federal government to restrict their political and economic liberties. Southerners saw these same events as evidence of a northern conspiracy to reduce the South’s political and economic influence

Show More
Related

  • Sectional Tension Dbq Essay

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a result of the Compromise of 1850, which defused the quarrel between the free Northern States and the slave Southern States, the territories acquired during the Mexican-American War were determined to be free, slave, or dependent upon the principle of popular sovereignty. California was admitted as a free state, the Utah and New Mexico territories were to be determined by popular sovereignty, the Texas-New Mexico boundary was solidified, and slave trade was terminated in Washington, D.C., making it easier for the South to recover fugitive slaves (Document A). As stated by an Anonymous Georgian in “Plain Words for the North,” everything the South could ask for was embodied in the Constitution, but two provisions were necessary to the South’s success – “the recognition of slavery where the people choose it and the remedy for fugitive slaves” (Document B). The North saw popular sovereignty and the remedy of fugitive slaves as deceptive encouragement of immoral and unconstitutional activity (Document C). But, southerners viewed the North’s assumption of ownership to be unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • Ak Mcclure Civil War Address Analysis

    233 Words  | 1 Pages

    Based upon superficial analysis of the Civil War, one would get the impression that the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the Emancipation Proclamation further incited the tensions between the North and South that contributed to the formation of the Southern Confederate States of America. The first point that stood out to me, contradicts the popular belief that the Civil War was caused by radical opposing views of slavery. A.K. McClure’s address highlights the ideology of both, the North and South, was rooted in rational principles. In addition, he discusses the opposing political views between George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.

    Read More

  • Apush Dbq Compromise Of 1850

    788 Words  | 4 Pages

    Consequently, claiming any state can have slavery within its borders surprised the South and brought discontent from the

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Tension Between The North And South In The Late 1800s

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    The gold rush in California became another factor putting pressure on the United States to resolve the status of territories and slavery within them. When new territories were brought up about joining the United States, slavery became a hot topic of debate within congress. To add the new states as slave states the balance between slave and free states would be unbalanced, either the north or south would be upset. An example of the tension between the north and South was the Wilmot Proviso that was introduced to Congress. It passed in the House, but not the Senate and stated that all new territory in Mexico would be free.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq Essay

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the early 1860’s the Southern states seceded from the Union due to the uproar of disputes over, slavery in the territories, the Northern abolitionists growth in power and the

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    1266 Words  | 6 Pages

    Throughout the course of the Civil War, Southerner’s felt as if the North was impending upon state’s rights and their way of life, which was based on slavery, was put at risk by the Union . At different points in the war, Southerners felt that the Union posed a bigger threat than before, especially after Abraham Lincoln gave the Emancipation Proclamation speech. The Civil War was not only fought by free Americans, but as times changed, enslaved people also took up arms alongside the Union and fought the Confederacy. The inevitable Civil War resulted in the South’s demise and them rejoining the Union. When the Southern States began to secede, they felt as if the Union and Northern Democratic party we’re threatening the lifestyle they had grown so used to.

    Read More

  • Impact Of The Dred Scott Case On The Civil War

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many Northerners, specifically Republicans, viewed the Supreme Court’s decision, which denied Scott’s freedom and believed African Americans to be non-citizens of the U.S. as a clear support for the system of slavery. The ruling shocked and angered Northern abolitionists and those against slavery who saw it as a major defeat in their struggle against slavery. Northerners were frightened as they thought that the Court’s ruling disturbed the fragile balance between free and slave states since it implied that slavery may spread to other areas, going against their attempts to stop this from happening. In addition, slave states no longer had to honor the “Once free, always free” rule meaning slaves who were seized to regions were freed- even if they came back to the state of Missouri which is a slave state, but that was opposed therefore, the federal government and the courts could not be expected to provide slaves with any

    Read More

  • Opposition To Slavery Dbq Essay

    1173 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Nation grew increasingly divided through the mid-1800’s over the issue of slavery, to the extent that it bled into other issues, primarily as a tensioned pretense to admis-sion of new states to the Union. Presidents prior to Polk either passively or actively re-sisted the annexation of new territories or promoting statehood, recognizing the issue of slavery and probable effects of spreading or denying slavery. The North’s ideological opposition to slavery was equally as legitimate as the South’s reasoning, but with slave labor accounting for up to 50 percent of the population in the South, there was also ac-ceptance on economical basis. Vast new lands became American territory throughout this period, while other disputed lands had boundaries

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Mexican War

    1321 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Amy Blackwell short article “Manifest Destiny and Slavery”, she states that the South believed that in order to thrive in the world, the nation itself had to constantly grow itself with slavery cementing itself America’s institution. This dispute would soon become the big question for years to come, with both sides not being able to come to an agreement on the status of slavery. After every debate, each side got more frustrated with the other, pulling each other further apart and causing friction in the Congress. However, all of this friction began when the first shot of the Mexican War, when it split the country into two

    Read More

  • Political Compromises Before 1860

    898 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, the South were afraid that the balance of power between the free and slave states would now shift toward free. To make matters worse, there was now discourse between the people in the North about the Fugitive Slave act, some believed, such as Daniel Webster in Document H, that “South is right and the North is wrong…” while others were strongly against it. The Kansas and Nebraska ask wanted to give more power to the people and allow them to decide on the implementation of slavery in their own states. However, in an attempt to affect the vote, abolitionists and pro-slavery people came to Kansas. This led to fighting and killing and the name “Bloody Kansas”.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    720 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War in 1865 was a turning point for our nation today. This transformation of the war between the Union and the Confederacy changed many lives, for the good and for the bad. Among the many changes that were heavily made consisted of abolishing slavery, restoration with the war, and the Thirteenth Amendment being brought forth. Formal president Abraham Lincoln main goal during the civil war was to save the union, while maintaining a great compromise with the union and the confederacy. With so many challenges being faced, the battle between the union and the confederacy was a war that changed for the better under Lincoln's strategy plan.

    Read More

  • How Did The Civil War The Cause Of The American Revolution

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Northern states, who did not rely on slavery for their economy, were anti-slavery and hence wanted all the nation to be such. The Southern states vehemently opposed this view, as their flow of money relied almost entirely on the use of slave labor. This extreme divide among the people roused talk of division in America. Stephens argues that “slavery and white supremacy were not only the cause for secession, but also the “cornerstone” of the Confederate nation.” He also states, quoting Jefferson: “(this is the) rock upon which the old Union would split”, referring to the existence of African slavery.

    Read More

  • American Identity Dbq

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

    Read More

  • Michael Holt The Fate Of Their Country Summary

    595 Words  | 3 Pages

    The fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled  Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Mexican American War

    603 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the issue of slavery in America would not be resolved until after the Civil War, the Mexican-American War marked a major turning point in the debate over slavery because it introduced the idea of popular sovereignty which resulted in Bleeding Kansas, and because the terms of the results of the war led to the Compromise of 1850, which was very controversial in the North. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery was an intensely debated subject in America. The Northern states were opposed to the practice of slavery, or at least the expansion of it, while the Southern states’ economy relied on slavery, and were supportive of it. The relationship between the North and the South was stable at the start of the 1800’s, but rapidly deteriorated over their conflicting views on slavery. In order to keep a balance of power, the Union consisted of an equal number of free and slave states.

    Read More

More about Civil War Dbq

Open Document