James Polk was elected in 1845 and had an expansionist viewpoint. He accomplished all of his presidential campaign goals which included gaining Texas, California, Nevada, Utah, most of New Mexico, and Arizona including a few more territories on the southern border, therefore, expanding America's territories. In addition, Polk began a period of Manifest Destiny. This was a phrase used to describe America’s goal to grow from “sea to shining sea”. Also, the Mexican-American War in 1846 acquired new lands for America in the southwest from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The rapid increase of new territory displayed America’s desire to expand, but it also brought up the question of whether slavery should be allowed in the new land. Compromises …show more content…
Some of the contributing factors that led to the Civil War were the foreign relations, supreme court cases, and presidential elections. One cause of the Civil War was the Mexican-American War, where American gained a lot of territory. The rapid acquisition of land in the Mexican-American War also brought up the issue of slavery being brought to the new territories. People wanted their individual havens pushing them to expand outwards because lands kept becoming overpopulated. Proslavery Southerners wanted the new land to allow slavery because slavery is what pushed the Southern economy forward; in contrast the North wanted the territory to be free because Northerners believed slavery was a moral issue. This issue forced people to choose sides and contributed to the division of the nation. The Kansas/Nebraska Act exemplified the tension between the sides. This act promised …show more content…
An effect of the Mexican-American War was the Compromise of 1850 which replaced the Missouri Compromise, trying to unify the nation and satisfy both sides regarding slavery. The Nation was divided by the decision on what to do about slavery in the newly discovered territories. One of the laws combined with the compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law, which forced Northerners to turn in runaway slaves. Abolitionists sole idea was to rid the country of slavery and now they were being legally forced to turn against all their moral views. Although, both sides were appeased by this Act, this was only a short-term solution because soon both sides became greedy and wanted their side to have more power in government. This contributed to the Civil War. The result of the Kansas/Nebraska Act was Bleeding Kansas. The violence displayed that people were willing to go to complete extremes for their sides, even killing each other so that their way of life would have more power. Bleeding Kansas showed the divide between the regions because it was the first bloodshed in this conflict. Next was the Dred Scott Case where Roger Tany stated that black people were property, and property was property everywhere, meaning there were no free states. Anti Slavery people were angered because it meant everything they had worked for meant nothing. This decision conveyed the message
There was only two things you could have your mind set on the one or the other. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was important to American History and it led to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was significant to American history, it was the breakup the lead to the Democratic and Republican Parties and it led to the civil war because
With the United States having acquired new territory due to the war with Mexico, there was much controversy about slavery. Some inhabitants believed they had the right to decide whether or not they wanted slaves. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of laws that were meant to balance out the controversies between slavery and territorial issues. The five laws dealt with the interests of the slaves of the free states and the south. There were five main points of the Compromise of 1850: California would be admitted to the union as a free state; the land won from the Mexican-American War would remain open to slavery until they became states; the slave trade would be banned in the nation's capitol; Texas would relinquish its claims to the land that
He maintained these benefits to be the paramount goal of westward expansion, and affirmed they would be acquired regardless of the state’s political stance. So, it can be discernibly surmised that the Mexican-American war expedited the American’s notion of conquering Texas and growing as a nation; that the bulk of this geographical growth was attained from the South; in which they hoped to earn a large sum of lands in order to utilize as farms that would be soon packed with slave labor. Most notably, the war indeed fabricated a social and geographical divide between the North and South because there was a raging debate over the land’s political status, and whether new lands are to be admitted as free or slave states. The Missouri Compromise originally settled this dispute by having all land from the Louisiana Purchase above Missouri free states and everything below it to be slave states. But new land from the Mexican-American war compelled the question again, free or slave?
The developing difference between the North and the South, primarily with the issue of slavery caused sectionalism between the nation. Sectionalism occurs when a region of the country is more important to the people than the interests of the whole country. Specific events pertaining to westward expansion, particularly the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, the Dred Scott court case, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the John Brown court case were fundamental causes of the Civil War. In 1819, Missouri requested admission to the Union under a slave state.
President James K. Polk believed that the United States had the God given right to spread across the continent to the Pacific Ocean. This was the belief of “Manifest Destiny,” which was coined by John O’Sullivan. He states “and so far as regards the entire development of the natural rights of man, in moral, political, and national life, we may confidently assume that our country is destined to be the great nation of futurity.” This explains the United States viewpoint and motive as they slowly claim parts of Mexico as theirs. James K. Polk attempted to secure the Mexican agreement to set the border on the Rio Grande and tried to buy northern California from Mexico, but failed because the Mexican government would never agree no matter what the United States offered them.
After the Mexican-American War came to a close, the United States still continued to run into many different types of conflicts. The new Western territory (California, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona) granted by the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo caused many disagreements among the North and the South. Many people suspected that the new territory would become slave states which would mean the US would have more slave states than free states. Citizens of the North argued that if the Western territory were to become slave states, it would create an unbalance between slave states and free states. Government officials were debating about whether or not slavery should be extended into those states.
The civil war was an inevitable result due to tensions and events that had taken place within the union during the past few years before the beginning of the war. Events such as the Missouri Compromise, Kansas-Nebraska act which repealed the Missouri Compromise, and finally the assault of Fort Sumter. The southern states began to assume that their states rights’ were being violated, the north was attempting to gain control of the union in order to abolish slavery and thus the south began succession from the union. The southerners’ efforts and its expansion proslavery mobs became hostile and violent toward Northerners prior to the war, although southerners were resulting in violence and intimidation to prevent others from speaking out against
The Mexican-American war is to be partially blamed for the civil war for a big reason, slavery. Slavery during the American-Mexican war was very problematic concerning the North and the South. There were problems between the NOrth and South concerning if slavery should be allowed or not, the North wanted slaves to be free but the south did not. The south benefitted from the slaves because in the south cotton fields and factories were more common and they would be handled by the slaves. The slave owners also referred to as masters, would say how labor work was only for slaves and doing their work would make the masters stoop down to the slaves level.
Because of the violent actions the Mexicans troops took against the American troop, James K. Polk demanded congress to declare a war against Mexico. Polk claimed that American blood was shed in American territory but in reality it still wasn’t anyone’s property because both countries claimed the land. At the time Mexico didn’t recognize the annexation of Texas. Mexico took the actions of opening fire after the “annex”, something James K. Polk advocated after his beliefs of manifest destiny which was his belief of expanding America into foreign soil. As soon as Mexico opened fire, the Mexican American war started.
The Mexican American war was one of many expressions of Manifest Destiny. Indeed, the zeitgeist during the mid 19th century was one of patriotism and ambition. Many Americans, believing that it was their God-given duty, wanted to claim territory that was not “rightly” being used. During this period, the United States nearly doubled in size because of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848, gaining massive amounts of what previously had been the Republic of Mexico. This meant that all the new territories in the Southwest could join the Union as slave states.
The Mexican and American War has been overlooked and forgotten for many years. Compared to previous wars such as the Civil War, the Mexican American War may seem small. However, thousands of Americans & Mexicans died, and half of the country of Mexico was taken by the United States. One of the main reasons the United States was not justified in going to war against Mexico was because of the United States’ greed for new territory, the United States provoking the war and the slavery issue that would come from the new territories acquired by Mexico.
The Manifest Destiny contributed to the Civil War because the expansion of new territories and states added into the United States. If the new territories were to vote in Congress for slavery and no slavery, it could be a threat for slavery in the South. ‘’many Southerners and some Northerners wanted slavery to exist everywhere in the United States, including in the new territories added to the country. Many other Americans did not want slavery to expand at all, and some people wanted slavery to be prohibited across the entire nation. Eventually these tensions would lead to the American Civil War’’ (Manifest Destiny, N/d).
The Mexican-American didn’t make the civil war inevitable because the main issue was about slavery. During that time, the American was split into two groups, the south was pro-slavery and the north were anti-slavery, and should the new territories should be a free state or a slave state. There were events that set in motions of the civil war. There were events that led to the civil war, that cause problems in the United States. The first event was of course the Mexican-American war.
Between 1830 and 1860, Manifest Destiny and territorial expansion did more to divide America than it did to unite. While it was not the main for the divide of America that was shown in the South’s secession from the United States, it brought up many issues that ultimately led to the Civil War. These issues are shown in the annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War that resulted from that, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Until 1836, the area of Texas was controlled by the Republic of Mexico and was a distant and irrelevant piece of land in most American’s minds. A few Americans had emigrated there from the South at the invitation of the Mexican government, but not many.
As they started to control more land, people from various countries began to come to the United States. With people of multiple race and ethnicities in the America, the conflict of slavery began. Slavery was one of the main contributors of the Civil War because the North and South could not agree, which of the new western states would be free or slave states. Thus sparking the American Civil War in 1861. As a result of the war, over six hundred thousand Americans died.