In the era before the civil war, specifically in the era post-purchase of the Louisiana territories, sectionalism between the Northern and Southern territories spread like wildfire. The Northern states, mainly focusing on commercial and industrial economy, supported the idea of the freedom of slaves. On the other hand, the South, a mainly agricultural and rural society, supported the idea of slaves and slave labor to work in the plantations of white men. These differences would later spark many conflicts (including the Civil War), in which the North was fighting for the freedom of slaves and the South was fighting for the keeping of slaves, especially in new additional territories. Thus, the most prominent political issues and debates that …show more content…
During the Jefferson administration, the United States had bought a territory from the French called the Louisiana Territory. But there was still a defining issue prominent over this new land, slavery. Thus came the Missouri Compromise, in which the US government prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude above the 36 30 parallel (Doc 2). However, this compromise only temporarily resolved the debate over slavery. When the territories of present day Kansas and Nebraska applied for statehood the debate over slavery soon arose once more as the Kansas-Nebraska Act these states broke the Missouri Compromise, allowing Kansas and Nebraska to be a popular sovereignty,increasing Northern and Southern tensions. This even grabbed the attention of Abraham Lincoln in which he expressed that he opposed slavery in Kansas and Nebraska and in a letter to Joshua Speed in 1855 (Doc 6). Debates over slavery extended all around the country at this time including Philadelphia in 1833. During this time the American Anti-Slavery drafted the Declaration of Sentiments, expressing their abolitionist and anti slavery beliefs (Doc 5). This draft not only expressed anti-slavery movements, but it was also a symbol of the increasing divisions between the North and South, similar to the debates from the added Nebraska and Kansas territories on …show more content…
But the main conflict however, was the violence and fighting between the residents living in Kansas. Given the blood that was shed, the conflict was given the name, Bleeding Kansas. Northerners living there even used propaganda and political cartoons to gain support, especially in the cartoon Forcing Slavery Down the Throat of a Freesoiler (Doc 7). The cartoon, published in 1856, depicts a Kansas man in shackles and chains with a man, representing slavery, being forced down the throat of a free soiler, reflecting the South's violent attempts to extend slavery into new territories and the North's resistance to this expansion. This graphic served as a mark of sectional divisions caused by the violence of southerners in Bleeding Kansas, leading to the civil war. This was not the only violent conflict between the Northern abolitionists and Southern farmers, as John Brown, a strong abolitionist, led a raid on Harpers Ferry in Virginia to try and spark a slave rebellion. In a political cartoon, Brown is shown as a hero and leader (Doc 4). But by many many southerners he was seen as insane, and as an aggressor for causing the deaths of multiple lives, adding on to the already high tensions in the
John Brown was involved in the Pottawatomie massacre during the vents of “Bleeding Kansas.” Brown and his sons had traveled to Kansas and attempt to make Kansas a free state, when the massacre occurred. The position of Kansas as either a free or slave state was dependent upon the people living in it, because this would be decided by popular sovereignty. The Pottawatomie massacre led
As each side became more involved with the debate, the tensions between groups rose and created the
The North, which were anti-slavery, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the new state. Meanwhile, the South,which were pro-slavery, believed that states, rather than the government, should have the right to decide whether they wanted slavery or not therefore they argued that the State of Missouri had the right to decide whether they wanted to be a slave state or not and that it should not be up to the Congress to decide. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be a slave state and allowed Maine into the Union as a free state to resolve crisis, which a member of Congress, Henry Clay, offered. The history surrounding the nineteenth century led to the establishment of the Missouri
Shrieks of mourning and agony, the echoes of rapid ammunition, blood drenching the land scarlet red. This was the scene for many during the American Civil War of 1861. It was a war meant to settle the debate between slavery in the South, owning people like property while forcing them to labor without payment, and abolitionism in the North, the immediate end of slavery. Slavery was vital to the South since it gave them their economy, class distinction, source of food, and supplied necessary resources such as cotton and tobacco for trade. In the North, however, slavery was much less common practice as Northerners had immigrants, foreign people moving to America that work for very little pay.
The country was divided self-consciously with different priorities. The dispute of slavery came to the forefront in American politics, primarily in the South because of their asset in large scale agriculture. The issue came to head when the debate whether the Missouri Territory was going to be entered as a free a state. The result was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Calhoun boldly stated his view from the Senate floor in 1837 that the race-based slavery that was prominent in the South was “instead of an evil, a good- positive good.”
The conflict between the North and South would take place in the state of Kansas and would later be known as “Bleeding Kansas”. According to McGraw Hill lesson 8.1 it says that the state of Kansas had a very nice climate and soil which Missouri was interested in for cotton farms, because of this, Northern states would also rush in attempt to claim Kansas as a majority antislavery and a free state. This information reveals to us how Bleeding Kansas was started and overall how it impacted the U.S. into starting a Civil
While the South hated Brown, the North treated him like a martyr, giving him names such as “an angel of light,” and “Saint John the Just.”. A mere two years late North and South went to war against each other. The North went to war marching to the song named “John Brown’s Body” (Benson 2009, 677-680). The Lawrence Republican, a Kansas newspaper, wrote the following words about the death of John Brown; “It is safe to say that the death of no man in America has ever produced so profound a sensation” (“Harpers”
The debate over the expansion of slavery into new territories and states created deep divisions between the North and South. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 and
This compromise caused loads of controversy because the Southern senators believed that the territories should be able to decide for themselves if they should allow slavery or not, like the original 13 states. The Southern senators thought the compromise was unconstitutional. On the other hand, the Northern senators argued that Congress actually had the right to say ban slavery in new states. I understand why the Missouri Compromise was created, but I believe that the compromise made the situation worse. To me it was unconstitutional of Congress to deny new states the right to decide if they should allow slavery or not.
The compromise angered many already unhappy Southerners about how the spread of slavery was restricted. The compromise provoked numerous disputes in which antislavery and pro-slavery groups fought for power. Neither the Northern nor Southern people wanted the other to gain the advantage. The second part of the compromise was called the 36°37’ latitude line and caused the fighting to heighten. The 36°37’ latitude line banned the entrance of slavery above the border of Missouri and restricted how much it could grow.
John Brown was an abolitionist that wanted slaves to have freedom. He believed conducting violence against the people who support slavery was the acceptable. During the Bleeding Kansas, Brown and his sons and others attacked the pro-slavery residents. “The town was put to the torch,, but no one was killed. The violence enraged John Brown, who considered himself God’s executioner of justice.”
This event was one of the first examples of violence in the debate over slavery, and was a prelude to the Civil
As northern and southern whites differed sharply about the proper role of slavery in the west, tensions arose. Western expansion made slavery an explicit concern of national politics, considering there could be an unbalance between the slave and free states. In 1819, the entrance of Missouri threatened to unbalance America, throwing this parity in favor of slave interests. As an effort to diffuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the undecided state of Missouri, the Missouri Compromise was drafted in 1820. First, Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and the admission of Maine would be a slave state balancing America once again.
This action left Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and other slave states as border states (“Civil War”). This marked the beginning of the Civil
One of whom was John Brown, an abolitionist who led several men to kill proslavery settlers in Laurence, Kansas in 1856. The brutality and severe deaths of this massacre became known as “Bleeding Kansas” (Lapansky-Werner336). Three years later, Brown attempted to lead a slave revolt in Harper’s Ferry. Although he suspected that this would inspire many slaves, his revolt was a failure due to the lack of abolitionists willing to fight beside him. Despite the fact that Brown’s life ended in execution, he did influence others that agreed with the fact that slavery would not come to an end “without very much bloodshed” (Lapansky-Werner344-345).