ipl-logo

Civil War Dbq

941 Words4 Pages

In the decades before the Civil War began in 1861, many changes occurred. Many scholars say that the main cause of the Civil War was slavery and the divide it caused between the northern and southern states. There were many events that convinced Southern political leaders that the institution of slavery was under attack by the North. Both the debates over slavery and the importance of slavery changed in this period. These factors caused the southern states to secede and the war to begin. Events that occurred in the United States between 1846 and 1861 divided the North and South. One of these events was the proposal of the amendment called the Wilmot Proviso. David Wilmot wrote the document in 1846 and his goal was to keep slavery from spreading …show more content…

The government prohibited the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The Fugitive Slave Act was also a part of the Compromise of 1850. The Fugitive Slave Act required northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners in the South. The act extremely angered the North because they were required to take part in slavery. The South did not like the addition of California as a free state. Their opinions on the Compromise of 1850 further separated the two halves of the country. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was also passed in 1854. It awarded the states of Kansas and Nebraska popular sovereignty. This repealed the Missouri Compromise because it allowed states to decide on their own if they were going to be a free state. It no longer depended on the Missouri Compromise line. It also raised tensions between the North and the South and created a violent atmosphere in Kansas. Pro-slavery and antislavery forces formed in Kansas when the vote for slavery was taking place. Those forces transformed Kansas into a state divided by two separate governments. Kansas had its own civil war that was a strong indication for a future war over slavery throughout the whole country. Next was the Dred …show more content…

The case went from Missouri courts all the way to the Supreme Court. The chief justice at the time was Roger Taney and he was pro-slavery. He declared that slaves were not citizens and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This angered the North and further divided them from the South. Anti-sentiment feelings for the opposite half were growing in the citizens of the North and the South. The South was angry at the North for trying to take away their way of life. The North was angry at the South for forcing them to help in the slave trade when they did not want to take part in it. The North was becoming more antislavery. John Brown decided to act on these feelings by planning a raid on Harper’s Ferry. His plans failed and he was arrested but his idea further split the North and the South. These events led the South to believe that the institution of slavery was under attack by the North. The last event that occurred in 1860 was the presidential

Show More
Related

  • The Role Of Pro-Slavery In Kansas

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    Moreover, there was much trouble in Kansas such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that two states, Kansas and Nebraska would be made up out of what was left of the Louisiana Purchase. These two territories could decide if they about slavery. Later, the people of Kansas wanted to separate their state into antislavery and pro-slavery groups. In March of 1855, elections for this idea began.

    Read More

  • Civil War DBQ Essay

    1569 Words  | 7 Pages

    So, in 1820, Henry Clay instigated the Missouri Compromise, the third critical event that led to the coming of the American Civil War. Missouri would be added as a slave state, but with that, a piece of Massachusetts, Maine, would be broken off and enter the union as a free state to ensure the balance. With this, a line was also drawn along the southern border of Missouri at the 36°30′ parallel and went across the remainder of the United States to the Pacific Ocean. This line divided the north and south literally as to where slavery was allowed and where it was not. This created greater diversity from the two sides and wedged the gap that was beginning to grow far wider.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Kansas Nebraska Act Important To American History

    764 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had been keeping the union from falling apart for 34 years. Almost all of the Southern Whigs voted for the bill and all of the Northern Whigs opposed it. This caused there to be conflict and no agreement could be found, thus causing the Southern Whigs to be known as Democrats and the Northern Whigs to stay Whigs. It had split up the Whigs and Democrats to form a new party; the Republicans. They were anti-slavery.

    Read More

  • Senator Stephen Douglas Argumentative Essay

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even those who benefited from Southern slavery, such as textile manufacturers, did not wish to see slavery expand further west or north. The Kansas-Nebraska Act succeeded only in shifting Northern public opinion even further away from reconciliation with the South. The Kansas-Nebraska Act also caused the collapse of both the Whig and Democratic parties. The parties split according to section: to pass the act through Congress, Southern Whigs voted with Southern Democrats against their Northern counterparts for the first time in history.

    Read More

  • Slavery In 1854: The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    104 Words  | 1 Pages

    In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, making the decision of whether or not the Western states’ would have allow slavery based off of popular sovereignty. The act gave hope to southerners to expand slavery but angered the anti-slavery northerners. The act pitted anti-slavery and pro-slavery forces against each other for control of the new territories. To increase the numbers of anti-slavery, the northerners formed a company to help anti-slavery families move to the new territories. Pro-slavery forced did the same thing to counter what the north was trying to do.

    Read More

  • Mexican-American War Dbq

    1208 Words  | 5 Pages

    Following the Mexican-American War, the conflict of 1846 through 1848 caused by Texas gaining its independence from Mexico, opinions and actions of the American citizens and government concerning slavery drastically changed. Beginning from the wishy-washiness of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, American ideas and values evolved - proven through the Emancipation Proclamation of 1865. Through the seventeen different presidents coming into power during the time frame of 1787 to 1865, the judgments of slavery exceptionally differed from each man in power, having a large impact on the current situation of slavery during their time in office. Following the Mexican-American war, America acquired so much new land, sprouting the debate over slavery

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    The years leading up to the Civil War were filled with great tension between the North and the South. Unfortunately after the result of the Kansas- Nebraska Act of 1854 it became clear to many Americans that the tension between the north and the south no longer had a resolution. The defining moment that solidified the war’s inevitability was in 1860. This year is significant because of the Election of 1860 which placed Abraham Lincoln into power. Now that Lincoln was president it gave southern sates a reason to secede.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Argument Essay

    731 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1854, Stephen Douglas introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act to Congress in order to amend the issue of slavery among the states. He proposed that the territory of Nebraska be split into two separate states, the other becoming the state of Kansas. Nebraska would become a free state and Kansas would become a slave state. However, this caused tension with the North because they noted that this bill repealed the Missouri Compromise, allowing slavery into land above the thirty six thirty parallel. As the state continued to grow in population, the state began to resemble a miniature United States.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    617 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Confederate States attempted to legislate against slave insurrection, which led into the Civil War. The Civil War was between the Confederate States and the Union States. During the Civil War, there were many fears because of the insurrection, affects toward the industries, affects toward food production and distribution, and there were many demands that needed to be met, such as men being drafted, and food being produced. The Emancipation Proclamation of 1862 granted freedom to the slaves in the Confederate States if the States did not return to the Union. Freedom would also only come to the slaves if the Union won the war.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    1069 Words  | 5 Pages

    Implemented in 1854, this revoked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which forbade slavery in the North. Even though Kansas would not be considered as a Northern state, it became a place of bloodshed as pro- and anti-slavery aspects expanded into the territory, strengthening the rising tension that was already present between the two parties. Pieter Geyl confirms that the North and South were ‘divided by a moral issue of the first magnitude,’ with one party ‘detesting slavery and, the other glorifying it as the basis of its social system.’ ‘Bleeding Kansas’ was an important component in understanding that the different ideologies of slavery between the people of Kansas at this time, resulted in their inability to compensate personal values for communal peace. As this act was aimed to save the North, to unify rather than divide, the Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted in the opposing contention. Reporter William Russell from the London Times had additionally claimed that the ‘tone’ and ‘speech’ of Southerners when alluding to people from the North were said in spite and hostility.

    Read More

  • Political Disputes Before 1860

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.

    Read More

  • Mexican American War Dbq Essay

    1164 Words  | 5 Pages

    With a desire to achieve the ideology of manifest destiny, the United States called war on Mexico to acquire their land. However, with the United States’ victory came the inevitable debate about slavery in not only the newly acquired territories, but also in the nation as a whole. The nation began to divide on the issue of slavery due to the Missouri Compromise which legalized slavery below the 36°30’ parallel and the Kansas-Nebraska Act which decided that the issue of slavery should be solved by popular sovereignty. Controversy sparked by political decisions like those aforementioned and events about slavery, disputes over slavery status in the territories, and extremist outlooks on the solution to these issues increased sectionalism and

    Read More

  • Civil War Disunion

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many events occurred leading up to the Civil War, that divided the nation and would cause long term effects on the country. Debates, discriminatory encounters, and political disputes were all contributors to the downfall of the nation before the Civil War. The Constitution, secession, and the Inaugural Address also threatened the unity of the country. The Missouri crisis was more or less the turning point of the country and provided a reason for disunion to be in the future. There was an argument over whether Missouri would be a slave state or a free state.

    Read More

  • Economic Start Of The Civil War Essay

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    or my History project I chose Option A. I believe that one of the biggest contributors to the start of the Civil war was economic issues. The economic start of the Civil War goes all the way back to the start of English settlement in North America. A new economy began in this era and it supported the use of slavery for labor to supply crops and cotton. Plantation owners in the South used slave labor for their own benefit to produce crops at a faster rate which made them more money.

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny, Kansas-American War, And The Compromise Of 1850

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed divided western land into the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to choose the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. This increased sectional tensions because the South wanted to build a southern railroad, as it would increase economic growth. Also, the North was upset because of the possibility of the expansion of slavery into western territories. Also, on the day of voting, border ruffians came from Missouri to vote in support of slavery. This greatly upset the North, especially the free-soilers.

    Read More

More about Civil War Dbq

Open Document