I choose classical theory because I believe that it is one of the most common theories and it is one of the more used theories throughout society. I can definitely say most, if not all high school students and people young and old use classical theory even though they might not know that that “classical theory” is the actual term for their actions. Classical theory is one of the more amazing theories to me because of its age and how many people probably use it on a daily basis. I am one of those people who most of the day I am using this theory. Although it is not usually a crime that would get me in trouble with the law but more with my parents like not paying attention in class or not doing homework. Because there are so many other things …show more content…
Classical and Choice theory are in most ways interchangeable except when it comes to proceeding with the crime itself. It seems that with choice theory the person will look at the positive and the negative aspects of the crime in order to make a decision in taking action or not. Whereas classical theory suggests that the person will consider the positive and negative consequences but still see committing the crime as more beneficial to them than not committing the crime. Also in choice theory thinking about the punishment involved would deter the crime from happening. My personal belief is that they are basically one and the same. Potato, patato right? This is why I choose it as the classical theories corresponding theory. In some ways I think that people get them confused and even mixed up. Because I know I get them mixed …show more content…
Then after looking over the Bullard High School Psychology 1 criminology theory notes, I realized that the best one for me would be one that I could really relate to . I kept looking over the notes really trying to find one I most related to and I was reading over the definitions for probably the third time. That is when I realized that the best one for me would be classical theory or choice. So I went and started out with some light research on it and it seemed right down my alley. I think it was just the fun of being able to put myself in a category, no matter how miniscule. Because I feel like this theory applies to everyone at least once in their like they had to have said screw it and did what they wanted knowing the consequences and knowing they could get into to some trouble. So in conclusion what really inspired and / or convinced me to pick this theory was the teachings of a wonderful teacher named Doctore and just the prospect of finding out more about it, because it was intriguing to
A theory is merely an explanation for life’s occurrences. They can be extensive, looping through idea after idea, or simply require a few sentences. Either way, theories are the starting point to the question, “Why?” In regards to criminology, we base our codes of law and by extension, our behavior, on these theories. One of the most prominent of which is the deterrence theory.
Criminology uses many theories to study crime, such as Social bond theory, Control theory social, containment theory etc. Social bond theory includes a various forms of social attachment theories. Attachment is a complicated process starting at birth with a maternal connection. This premature form of joint sets the standard for an individual's future attachments to friends, family members, co-workers and lovers. Control theory suggests a responsibility towards one's behavior.
RCT's basic premises are that human beings base their behavior on rational calculations, they act with rationality when making choices, their choices are aimed at optimization of their pleasure or profit. An example of Rational choice theory applying to criminal behavior would be a criminal who sells drugs for the goal of money but also weigh out the risk of getting caught. The scene from Goodfellas that applied to rational choice theory was where Henry blew up cars in the parking lot with the goal of making money and didn’t care about the risk of his dad finding out.
Ethical theories are ways of telling right from wrong and include guidelines of how to live and act in an ethical way. For example when faced with a difficult situation in your life, you can use ethical theories to assist you in making the right decision. One key theory is consequentialism, which says that an individual’s correct moral response is related to the outcome/ consequence of the act and not its intentions/ motives. Early writers on this theory were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, a modern writer is Peter Singer. For example Brenda Grey has asked for the asthma specialist to visit her weekly, and to decide if this is necessary the professionals involved have to look at how it would affect her wellbeing.
Assignment Nine Critical criminology is the idea that the media and the criminal justice system are the things that shape the publics view on crime. These sources influence our ideas of who commits crime and who is victimized by crime. These sources use their influence of crime to continue to control how the public sees crime and uses that to further their own agenda. Whereas, left realism is the idea that the depicted visions of crime are somewhat true. Some people are more likely to be victimized, however the media and criminal justice systems over exaggerate these crimes in order to instill higher levels of fear.
Modelling theory also called the social learning theory can be defined as “behaviour which is learned in much the same way and such learning includes the acquisition of norms, values, and patterns of behaviour conceive to crime,
Integrated criminological theories have been constructed through theoretical integration and can be best understood as the act of combining two or more sets of logically interrelated
Agnew’s General Strain Theory in There Are No Children Here Introduction Throughout this semester, we have covered various criminological theories along with their strengths and limitations. These theoretical perspectives provide possible explanations to why individuals commit crimes. In addition to, these theories are indirectly woven within cultural objects such as song lyrics, movies, books, and television.
For social control theory, the underlying view of human nature includes the conception of free will, thereby giving offenders the capacity of choice, and responsibility for their behavior. As such, social control theory is aligned more with the classical school of criminology than with positivist or determinist
Social process theory has several subdivisions including: social control theory, social learning theory and social reaction (labeling) theory (will only focus on social control theory). Social control theory insinuates every person has the possibility of becoming a criminal, but most people are influenced by their bonds to society. It contends that individuals obey the law and are less likely to commit crime if they have: learned self-control, attachment (to family, friends, peers, education, etc.), commitment (to school, learning, etc.), involvement (in leisure activities, sports, etc.), and belief (those that are positive). According to social control theory, an individual is more likely to be criminal/deviant if they are detached and alienated (from friends, education, family, etc.),
There are many different modes of criminological thinking and two of those are Cultural criminology and administrative criminology. Both of these concepts are vastly different to each other which Mike Presdee delves into in Cultural Criminology: The long and winding road (2004). According to Presdee (2004), administrative criminology “denies and rejects the importance of culture and lived experience in the commission of crime, preferring instead to concentrate on the pseudo-scientific analysis of criminal behaviour” (Presdee, 2004:276). Administrative criminology has been fabricated as overdetermined descriptive criminology which is disconnected from any sort of social or human interaction.
They seek to gain answers to what really happens on the streets, police stations, behind prison bars and courtrooms, They collect much of their information by analyzing data sets and statistical studies mainly on topics relating to drug use and homicide rates. Not only does it attempt to explain crimes within a societal background and the variations between our society, but this brings me to the three distinct theories as stated in the book on page 67, that attempt to explain why criminals behave in a certain
In the last part I wold give my opinion on which model is more appealing to me. The first thing that stuck me after reading the analects and the work of Han Fei is that, they both believed
Modernist worldview Modernity includes a search for absolute, unquestionable, rational certainty, based on logic and evidence alone. (Of course, many “modern philosophers” admitted such may be ultimately impossible for finite beings, but that didn’t stop them from holding it as an ideal and continuing the search.) [1] Post-modern worldview Postmodern is simply the rejection of certainty in the synthetic realm, even in science. Postmodern is also defined by the belief that all truth claims are infected by “belief”. That is, there is no such thing as “a view from nowhere.”
Consequentialist theory followers. Consequentialist theory followers focus mostly on the consequences of the decision and the action. The most famous consequentialist theory is Utilitarianism. This theory follows the principle of utility which assumes that the decision is ethical if it maximizes benefits to the society and minimizes harms.