This Essay compares Claudius with the tragic hero Macbeth. It brings out the amazing similarities between them though they are generally considered really apart from each other. These tragic characters are driven by the ambition to become the head of their land and it creates a mess for them and others who are involved in their personal and public life. The positive qualities of Claudius and Macbeth can make the readers feel that they deserve kingship. They are true to themselves and feel guilty for their murderous act. They have similar flaws, hubris, insolence, and bravado. Both Claudius and Macbeth are compared based on their characteristics and actions in both their story’s, also their ambitions and how they both were similarly connected …show more content…
Hamlet and Macbeth deal with the desire for royal power and its aftermaths. This comparative study takes us to the possible outcome that a tragic villain can possess qualities that can be on par with the tragic heroes. Being hero-villains, Macbeth and Claudius exhibit similarities. Both are tyrants, usurpers, murderers, aspiring, ambitious, courageous and treacherous. Though Richard III can also be compared with Macbeth and Claudius, Shakespeare’s presentation of that character projects more of his villainous nature than of his heroic qualities because he is cruel from nature. But Macbeth and Claudius become villains because of the accidental circumstances (Homchaudhuri 240). Macbeth’s epileptic nature, fear of death and also the fear of exposure of his dark silence of the actions reduces his heroic greatness. On the other hand, Claudius is cool and composed though he also bears in his heart, a dark silence. Both of them have their ladylove and they act as direct or indirect boosting power behind their deeds. In order to possess Gertrude and the royal power, Claudius commits fratricide. Lady Macbeth enhances Macbeth’s motive to attain royal power by bracing up his courage to commit regicide. Macbeth and Claudius are outstanding individuals. Other characterize cast light on them and vice versa. They are generous, proud and important. They rise above the common ranks of mankind. Macbeth wins the battle for King Duncan against the army of Macdonald, Ireland, and Norway. His performance in the battlefield is special and it is intimated to Duncan through the captain’s words that the brave Macbeth split the traitor Macdonald from his navel to his jawbone. That is why Duncan, in his welcoming
This essay will examine the different characters and the forces they exert that lead to the assassination of Duncan, Banquo, and others by Macbeth.
One of the qualities of Shakespeare’s plays that have allowed them to remain interesting to many generations is that the motivations of his characters remain undistinguished allowing for much debate on whether or not to sympathize with, hate, or even love characters. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark there is a multitude of characters in which their motivations and inner turmoils are not revealed to the audience, one of which is King Claudius. Claudius shows the audience two apparent sides of him, an effective ruler who values his queen, and the treacherous villain who killed his own brother to become king. Although there is much debate about which side represents Claudius most accurately his constant attempts to control Hamlet, his inability to make a prayer for forgiveness, and
Macbeth clearly distinguished himself as a great warrior, but his battlefield heroics did not carry over into heroic behavior off the battlefield. It is ironic that he, who had defended Duncan from traitors colluding with Irish and Norwegian armies, himself harbored traitorous thoughts. As he was contemplating assassinating Duncan, Macbeth was having trouble in justifying what he was about to do. “I am his kinsman and his subject, / Strong both against the
Macbeth is the Shakespearean play that features the triumphant uprise and the inevitable downfall of its main character. In this play, Macbeth’s downfall can be considered to be the loss of his moral integrity and this is achieved by ambition, despite this, Lady Macbeth and the witches work through his ambition, furthering to assist his inevitable ruin. Ambition alone is the most significant factor that led to Macbeth’s downfall. The witches are only able to influence his actions through Macbeth’s pre-existing and the three witches see that Macbeth has ambition and uses it to control his action. Ambition alone is displayed throughout the play to be the most significant cause for Macbeth’s downfall.
Claudius and Macbeth are each characters to be reckoned with. Both decide to murder their king and superior, whether they are actual kin or kinsmen under fealty, to place themselves upon the throne. After their initial crimes, both men handle their newfound power differently and take different measures to keep their crimes hidden. Macbeth goes into what appears to be a killing frenzy to keep his secret hidden, while Claudius acts as if his brother’s death was a tragic accident and is willing to speak about it openly. Also, Claudius marries his deceased brother’s wife while Macbeth blames the murder of the king on his own sons and takes his wife with him into the newfound royal life.
This paper explores how Shakespeare's play highlights the impact of ambition in the characters Macbeth, Lady Macbeth and Banquo. Macbeth, who
Macbeth loses his last scrap of morality when he orders the murder of innocents to enrage a rival. Shakespeare’s Macbeth shows that humans will do whatever it takes to achieve and maintain power by charting Macbeth’s descent from noble thane to murderous tyrant. Macbeth’s position of thane is already quite powerful but the need for more power overwhelms his loyalties to others.
Published in 1577, Rapheal Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland was the key source for William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. The framework of Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’ originated from Holinshed’s account of King Duncan and Macbeth, but he changed facts to fit the social and political context of Shakespeare’s time, and to craft dynamic characters instead of static. Several intentions were behind Shakespeare’s modifications, but they served three key purposes; Dramatic; Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a more exhilarating story than Holinshed’s Chronicles, Thematic; Shakespeare creates a multifaceted portrayal of Macbeth.
Greed for power leads corrupt leaders to pursue power through ruthless and violent ways, putting their countries in an unstable state. Macbeth commits murders and violent acts to earn his absolute power, but his corrupt mindset of yearning power leads to instability in the Scotland. After hearing from the witches, Macbeth admits that, “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical/ Shakes so my single state of man/ That function is smother'd in surmise /and nothing is but what is not.”
Macbeth was an excellent fighter on the battlefield that he killed without a wink, however, when he killed the great king-Duncan it made him fall into the endless guilty. It was quite understandable that why Macbeth had such difference between his behaviours. On the battlefield, he was considered as the hero on the nation, when he fought dauntlessly and conquered the rebels. Since he felt proud of what he have done on the field, he had no reason to be ashamed when he massacred the enemy. Although he has been cold-blooded on the battleground, his conscience still could not persuade his cold-blood of being peace.
“Macbeth”, a tragedy by William Shakespeare illustrates the devastation toward one's character as a result of use of ambition without the presence of morality. The effective use of Scotland's heath, immense castles, and bleak weather conditions in the story, serve to deliver a somber tone and sinister atmosphere to the reader. The setting is a necessary element in the story that symbolizes a secure environment that sharply contrasts with an environment that is insecure. Through the character of Macbeth, the reader is introduced to a man who at first is not characteristically driven to perform malicious actions, but in the end gives up his moral values for his desire. Shakespeare effectively uses Macbeth and his emotionally weak character in
Shakespeare, the well known playwright, is believed to have created the well know play known as “Macbeth” in 1606. Shakespeare has been previously renowned for diverse character development, and the play “Macbeth” is no exception. Personal being, having a sense of belonging, straying from materialism, and overall morality and decency towards others are four main characteristics of a well developed humane character. Throughout the progression of the play Macbeth’s character development is well portrayed as Macbeth’s character is altered after turning points in his life. Macbeth gains a sense of personal being with his morals he tried to live by.
The tyrant Macbeth comes to the realization that the hopes raised within him have become no more than broken promises and dreams. In his death he is remembered by Malcolm to be nothing more than a “cruel minister” and “dead
Shakespeare’s play regarding the noble, beloved Macbeth presents the idea that even a hero can descend into being no more than a deceitful criminal. The audience witnesses numerous factors that can push the tragic hero over the edge, but can see the protagonist's downfall is caused by no particular issue, instead a sum of numerous circumstances. The idea that even a hero can descend into being no more than a deceitful tyrant is the main focus in Shakespeare’s work, Macbeth. This downfall is presented in the protagonist, Macbeth himself, as the Audience observes numerous factors push the tragic hero over the edge.
Though Hamlet may earn love from the people of Denmark, Claudius earns respect. Some may argue it is better to be loved than feared as a leader, but Claudius’ resilience in his quest to murder Hamlet proves