Cloning Persuasive Essay

Situation: The public debate on cloning and its coverage in the media often features unreal scenarios that are not based on scientific fact, but rather express a diffuse sense of uneasiness. Television documentaries, popular movies and comments in the press frequently reiterate the arguments that cloning threatens humanity or that it could change the entire fabric of society and not for the better. It is therefore important to examine where such apocalyptic visions of cloning originated and how they have occupied such a prominent place in the media and popular culture. Finding an answer is highly relevant to this and other contentious debates, because we are only able to understand the public rejection of cloning technologies if we are conscious of the sources of popular knowledge. We are only able to understand the public rejection of cloning technologies if we are conscious of the sources of popular knowledge on the topic. Proposed Solution: Paper analyses the presentation of clones and cloning and the scientists involved in the mass media, with an emphasis on documentary films. Documentaries emphasize the dangers inherent to new scientific developments. Although potential horrors are often juxtaposed with the vision of a miracle cure, negative connotations predominate. This is a reasonable

Potential Obstacles: By far, the most frequently highlighted danger of cloning technologies is the potential to use them for eugenic purposes. Cloning is only the first step toward the replication of successful specimens and the fabrication of ideal human types. In the perception of the general public, cloning is not only a new technique, but also a symbol for the increasing power of scientists and for the disposition of humanity. Cloning symbolizes the scientific endeavor to control nature in the service of knowledge and power. Thus, in the public perception and accordingly in the media it has become a general symbol for the ambivalent potential of genetic