ipl-logo

Cobell Vs. Government Case Study

643 Words3 Pages

Cobell vs. Government The flied done against the government as a “Mismanagement, ineptness, dishonesty and delay of federal officials” was filled June 10, 1996 and it took years for settlement of 3.4 billion in December 2010 1.4 billion to the plaintiffs and 2 billion allocated for repurchase of lands distributed under Dawes act. I have done some research regarding on what has happen since Authorizing the funding and what are the recent appeals and lastly Cobell goal. However recently president Obama sings legislation authorizing the government funding of the final portion of the 3.4 billion settlements and Judge Hogan is in charge for the fairness hearing on the settlement in spring of 2011this is a year since the settlement. Up until October …show more content…

Cobell representative and third party donation appeal the court with intent to obtain post settlement fees too. As the case is gradually reducing the appealed was denied of compensation for expenses acquired during the litigation and appeals. And the district court reasoning for denial is because the cost incentive awards given to Eloise Cobell at the time of her case when it wasn’t settle yet. Also the district court denied the case because there we no evidence and for Cobell to apply its expenses under the settlement. Cobell’s lawyer argue that Cobell class representative personally owed Lannan foundation, Otte Bremer Foundation, Charles River Associates, RSH consulting and lastly Black feet reservation which Cobell directs . All this contributors to the case add up to a total of 1.9 million. Hogan who was assign for the fairness hearing also mention that the motion to reconsider asked for 8.2 million as opposed to the originals copy of .5 million. Who do I believe? Quite frankly I will stand by Cobell side for the simple fact of Indians’ are being taken advantage of time and time again. Judge Thomas Hogan is charge now so in the near future any appeals or petition will go to

Show More
Related

  • Mccreary County V. ACLU Case Study

    1108 Words  | 5 Pages

    McCreary County v. ACLU (2005) Pinson, 4 McCreary County v. ACLU Asher Pinson Liberty High School AP US Government, 2A McCreary County v. ACLU was a significant case for the Establishment Clause, freedom of religion, and the First Amendment itself. This case made its way into the Supreme Court in the later part of 2004, and a decision was reached in the middle of 2005. This case extended the power of the Establishment Clause to prohibit the public display of religious texts in government-funded buildings.

    Read More

  • Sucklal Case Summary

    156 Words  | 1 Pages

    This consolidated appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action, a foreclosure action, and a motion for possession of property initiated in the Circuit Court for Howard County. Mortgagor Sirina Sucklal (“Sucklal”), appellant, challenges the grant of summary judgment to the substitute trustees Mark H. Wittstadt, and Gerard Wm. Wittstadt, Jr. (collectively, “Substitute Trustees”), the ratification of the foreclosure sale, and the subsequent grant of a motion for judgment awarding possession to the purchasers at the foreclosure sale. On appeal, Sucklal presents six questions for our review, which we have condensed and rephrased as follows: 1.

    Read More

  • Bell V. Wolfish Case Study

    77 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Bell v. Wolfish, the Supreme Court had to determine if violations of the eight amendments had occurred under the “punitive intent standard” which distinguishes between incarceration and detainment. The court also had to determine if any violations of the eighth amendment had occurred which resulted in cruel and unusual punishment being inflicted upon the inmates who were primarily housed as pretrial detainees. The case alleged that within a new constructed federal jail in New York City

    Read More

  • Taxpayer Case Study

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dear Mr. Gaylord Bigmoney: Thank you for contacting me to review your investments and for advice on whether or not to purchase additional state and municipal bonds. Mr. Rich Broker has given you a couple recommendations about your investment portfolio. First, Mr. Broker has recommended that you take the cash presently invested in the Certificates of Deposits and purchase more state and municipal bonds. Second, Mr. Broker has recommended that you borrow an additional $800,000 on one of the unencumbered apartment houses, which would require you to give a Deed of Trust for security on the loan, and use the loan proceeds to purchase more state and municipal bonds. When Mr. Broker gave you these recommendations the rates were as follows: present

    Read More

  • Office Hymon Case Study

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    In August of 1976 the trial was held. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the district court granted a motion for a verdict in the favor of the Police Department and the City. Later the court found the remaining defendants on all of the issues. The Sixth Circuit on appeal affirmed the part of the district court 's decision to dismiss the case against each of the individual defendants. The court remanded with respect to the City in the light of Monell v. Department of Social Services, an intervening Supreme Court decision holding that municipalities could become subject to liability under the United States Code, title 42, section 1983.

    Read More

  • Jaffee V. Redmond Case Study

    193 Words  | 1 Pages

    The jurors in the court case ruled in favor of Allen’s family and ordered Redmond to pay Allen’s family a significant sum of money.

    Read More

  • Just Mercy Essay

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    McMillian recorded a common claim against state and neighborhood authorities, which went the distance to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against McMillian, holding that an area sheriff couldn 't be sued for cash harms. Along these lines, McMillian settled with different authorities for an undisclosed sum. McMillian 's case served as a catalyst for Alabama 's pay statute, which was

    Read More

  • Abel Fields Essay

    520 Words  | 3 Pages

    The government appealed the court of appeals decision to bring to the Supreme Court where it is now. I stand with full belief, and the majority opinion of the Supreme Court that Abel Fields’ conviction be overturned. His First Amendment rights had been violated. Even though he was

    Read More

  • Corcoran Jennison Case Study

    382 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hays will provide actuarial services to Corcoran Jennison that will ensure optimal plan design, networks, and funding, and budget arrangements. Our Underwriting team led by Dave Ross uses a variety of tools to actuarial analyze renewal/funding calculations and to validate and challenge insured renewals. By thoroughly reviewing renewal calculations in this manner we ensure the most appropriate underwriting criteria and guidelines are used. Our renewal validation process will provide concrete support for any argument we use with a given insurance company in negotiating your renewal. Hays’ Underwriting unit leverages our knowledge of insurer practices in an applied manner that situates our clients in the position likeliest to achieve the best

    Read More

  • Attorney Contingency Discourse

    1244 Words  | 5 Pages

    The last case heard by Judge Teague was “Molly” versus American Express. Essentially, Molly owed American Express nearly $6,000. When initially notified of the charges

    Read More

  • The Erie Doctrine

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Gilmores were allowed to file the amended complaint because they had evidence of the defendant’s violation of California Civil Code and that the defendant also broke the contract by transferring the payments without notifying the plaintiff. The Gilmores were able to manipulate the process to their advantage because when they submitted their second complaint, they did not include the RESPA claim that the defendant violated federal statutes. Since they did that, the federal court could not claim jurisdiction over it. The defendant could not bring the case to federal court because the plaintiff’s current claim did not include anything related to a federal statute violation. 10.

    Read More

  • Deborah Gellibrands: A Short Story

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    “They refused to serve as aggrieved plaintiffs months ago. Sheckly and his legal team had to scramble when the Gellibrands refused to participate. He changed the case midstream, and is bringing if forward as a class action lawsuit. It’s still called the Gellibrand Case, but the Gellibrands aren’t involved any longer.” “I’m surprised the court didn’t dismiss the case.”

    Read More

  • General Edwin Walker Case Study

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    On July 30, 1965, a court had made a judgement of a trial previously in court, which General Edwin Walker was given to have had been against the Associated Press in a libel action. Later, the case was brought to the Supreme Court of the United States. On June 12, 1967 the Supreme Court came to a decision that General Edwin Walker was not entitled to the damages that were towards the Associated Press. It was in Walker’s favor, so they had thought but it was acted against him with the choice given by the Supreme Court but there was no proof of malice to punish him directly for it. With the final judgement of the trial and previous given judgement General Walker was to get nothing from the Associated Press and he was to repay all the costs due

    Read More

  • The Cause Of Wrongful Incarceration

    1371 Words  | 6 Pages

    After suing the district attorney’s office, he was awarded $14 million dollars for each year on death row (innocenceproject). According to the court documents, Thompson brought action against the district attorney’s office alleging that their conduct was the reason for his wrongful conviction and incarceration. When handing down the decision in Connick v. Thompson, Justice Clarence Thomas issued the majority 5-4 decision in which they decided that the prosecutor’s office could not be held liable

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Of Alibi

    1175 Words  | 5 Pages

    Plea of Alibi is the defense taken by the accused. The word 'alibi ' is of Latin origin and means “elsewhere” . It means that he was physically not present at the time of offence by reason of his presence at another place. The burden of proving alibi is on accused. The accused must be so far away at the relevant time that he could not be away at the place where the crime was committed.

    Read More

More about Cobell Vs. Government Case Study

Open Document