(St-Onge & Heymsfield, 2003) At the end of the trial the results showed subjects with supplemented with sugar foods gained 1.6kg and the artificially sweetened foods lost 1.0 kg. The sugar supplement group didn’t change their sugar intake to compensate for their sugar supplement diet. The artificial sweetener supplement group, daily energy intake decreased by about 105kcal, which would produce a 0.9kg weight loss over a 10 week period. (St-Onge & Heymsfield, 2003) A study of 163 obese women received an energy restricted diet during a 19 week weight loss program. They were assigned to either aspartame, a sweetener, or avoid aspartame containing products.
So, drinking soda makes you even hungrier/ thirstier. A study was done on children, and proved that drinking one serving of soda per day increased their risk of obesity by sixty percent. Some simple reasons soda is unhealthy are, it is purely empty calories, and you may become addicted. In addition, the high percentages of sugar in soda can cause liver disease, insulin resistance (diabetes), and heart disease. It also may cause Leptin resistance.
Did you know Americans spent $76 billion on sugary drinks in 2013? Teens today drink too much soda and sugary drinks on a daily basis. The article, “Soda Showdown”, written by Rebecca Zissou presents two perspectives about taxing sugary drinks. One perspective about taxing sugary drinks is there should be a tax. First, too much sugar from sugary drinks or soda can lead to health problems.
The university of Queensland public health school study showed that if a 20% sugar tax was introduced over 25 years there would be 4400 fewer cases of heart disease, 1100 fewer strokes, 1000 less cancer cases, it would raise $250 million a year, the reduction on annual health spend would be $29 million and it would help stop escalating weight gain. Would you still buy as much soft drink if the price was raised by 50
Cook County proposed the penny-per-ounce tax for sweetened beverages, which would have become effective on July 1; however, a judge blocked the tax last week. The soda tax would increase the price of sweet drinks, to 30%-50% higher, and it would have raised over 60 million dollars, which would have been used for the expense of other services. Cook County needed more money, but they were not going to increase property tax. Instead of raising the property tax to pay for spending, they decided to raise the sales tax. The people of Cook County would have driven to other nearby counties to avoid spending the extra cost from the tax.
Other claims is revolves around the main claims. Every food is bad if people eat too much. So author write how we can reduce sugar consumption. “Over the past 50 years, consumption of sugar has tripled worldwide.” Lustig use this to support claims. I think it cannot be the supporting.
The main topic of this article talks about our Underage Drinking in our growing society, and what can done about it. If underage drinking is eliminated, shopping for alcohol could decrease by billions. This would end in an oversize reduction in shopper expenditures. If all adult excessive drinkers were reborn to moderate drinkers World Health Organization consume a pair of drinks every day, rather than disbursement $53.6 billion for alcohol, the expenditure would be a few billion. The loss of billions in adult shoppers for alcohol consumption to the loss of $22.5 billion in underage drinking would end in a loss of
“According to the MADD website, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that the law has saved about 900 lives a year” (Cary 15). If you figure the math involved out, the law has saved over 29,000 lives. The United States’ original purpose in lowering the requires age was to improve the number of drunk drinking people and crashes involving alcohol, which at the time the legal drinking age was 18 years old. The minimum legal drinking age of 21 law influenced the decrease of alcohol-related accidents containing citizens under the age of 21 (Saylor 331). The drinking age is saving lives, why would we change it?
Soft drink sales increase at an annual rate of 2% and diet soda’s increase at a rate of 11% annually. Aspartame is used by many soft drink companies, including Borden Inc., General Foods, H. J. Heinz, Quaker Oats and Coca-Cola. Aspartame has sent profits through the roof. Since these companies can market their products as “low-calorie”, the increase of sales has gone up 20% annually since 1985. That’s an increase of over 660% to this day.
THE NUMBER AND PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS: Coca cola is generally served at KFC and McDonald’s, increase in the price of these complimentary goods causes a decrease in the demand of Coca Cola. Hence we can say that there is an inverse relationship between the complementary goods price and demand for Coke. 4. CONSUMER TASTES AND PREFERENCES The more a product is found desirable the more likely will the person buy it. Effective advertising and positioning attracts customers.