Code Of Hammurabi Essay

Hammurabi’s code was it just? Hammurabi code was just because of Family Law, Property Law, Personal Injury Law. family Law in Hammurabi’s code were just. If a married lady was caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water.” “If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off” (Doc C).

During the reign of king Hammurabi the ruler of Babylon a regional city-state (r. 1763-1755 BCE), he created and also was one of his greatest achievements while in throne was the development of the most integrated legal Babylonian codes written for his society to follow, “ The Law Code of Hammurabi was not the first law code produced during the first 3000 years of Mesopotamia, but it was the most famous one because it was the most permanent one “. The Code of Hammurabi affirms a society of strict justice there are 282 case laws decisions from economic provisions, to family law, even criminal law, and civil law, penalties varied according to the wealth of the individual offenders and their circumstances of the offences. The information

Hammurabi claimed that his laws were both just and helpful to a wide range of people, but the majority of the laws don’t support either of his claims. In the instance of many laws, he appears to be very drastic with his consequences. In one of his codes, he says that if a women is caught in adultery with another man, both people must be tied up and thrown into the water (doc C, law 129). The act of binding the two people together and drowning them is a very specific and extreme repercussion for cheating. Another example of Hammurabi’s unnecessary harshness, was the law stating that if a man has broken into another’s house he shall be put to death by piercing him or hanging him in the hole which he made in the house (doc D, law 21).

The definition of the word “just” is fair, therefore I will be explaining if I think the laws are fair or unfair. In my opinion, Hammurabi’s laws were unfair to the citizens of the civilization. The laws were very cruel, unnecessary, and very extra. In the following paragraphs, I will explain my reasoning for my thoughts on Hammurabi’s laws. Based on the information that I have read on

Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

In document C, Law 129 talks about how if a married lady is caught cheating on her husband, she and the man she was cheating with, get tied together and thrown into the water. Hammurabi should want his people to feel safe and be with whoever they want to be with. The husband may get mad at the lady, but getting thrown into water and drowning is really harsh. The woman would be scared. In Law 195 it states, “If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off.”

Name: Brianna Cohort: UCLA Question: Hammurabi’s Code: Was it just? Hammurabi and his Codes Introduction Did you know Hammurabi created the first set of laws. Hammurabi was a king of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi’s codes were laws.

“Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong. ”(Theodore Roosevelt) To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him.

These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

He is known today for his law code that supported “an eye for a eye” and the civil rights he gave to members of the society other than men. Hammurabi set a strong foundation for our society today, with his rules and family relationship changes, he did it by making a set in stone law code, and giving the women of ancient Babylonia more civil rights in marriage. Hammurabi’s law code was the first of its kind that we base our legal system off of today. Hammurabi’s Code

She shall dwell in the house they have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she lives.” This is unjust because you should not leave your sick wife alone and marry another woman. Many people think king Hammurabi’s laws were just, but they were not just because of that evidence. Justice is not absolute in this because people worked hard to make a marriage,

One reason Hammurabi’s code was just is that his purpose was to protect the weak, widows and orphans. He said “I set up these laws, so that the strong might not injure the weak and to protect the widows and orphans” (Doc A). This proves the code was fair because he created these laws to protect people, not hurt them. This also shows that Hammurabi's code was not made in favor of him because he made the code to try and help out people low down on the social structure and not just

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.