What are the companies’ history, mission, vision and organisational structure? Cognizant first started as Dun & Bradstreet Satyam Systems (DBSS). It was an India-based amalgamation between D&B and Satyam Computers in 1994. When they got to the stock market in 1994, they made the promise ‘We will grow faster than our competition, and we deliver you a little bit less net result.’. From that moment, they really grew hard. In 1996 they spun off some or their subsidiaries, like IMS International, Nielsen Media Research, and begun adding third-party clients. From that moment, the company was formed as Cognizant Corporation. In January in 1997 DBBS was named as Cognizant Technology Solutions, also known as CTS. The focus of Cognizant was for the …show more content…
Cognizant are a service company. They exist by the fact that they are really helping out their clients and that means they need to be humble, listen to them, and be very focused. The company can survive by the fact that the clients feel valuable. Cognizant’s vision is to keep growing. Cognizant doesn’t really have a clear mission. According to W. Verbruggen, our interviewee, Cognizant long term vision is to keep growing. That is keeping there promise, which they made in 1994 with the shareholders. They promised to grow faster than their competitors. The want to keep the #1 spot of fastest growing and market leading IT company. Cognizants organizational structure CEO Francisco d'Souza Chairman of the Board John Klein Vice Chairman of the Board Lakshmi Narayanan Director Director Director Director Director John Fox Thomas Wendel Robert Howe Maureen Breakiron-Evans Robert Weissman COO & CFO Delivery Legal & Secretary Global Client Services Gordon Coburn Chandra Sekaran Steven Schwartz
Case management is a critically important modality in the provision of effective services for individuals who are experiencing difficulty. It is an approach to organising interventions that address the needs and circumstances that significantly impede the life chances of an individual through a collaborative process of assessment, planning, facilitation and advocacy for options and services. There are various forms of case management models and a range of theoretical lenses through which to view human development. However, these models can vary in accordance with the sector in which the dominant or priority issue is located, such as the health sector or the learning and development field. The variation within each of these areas implies that there is much discussion in the literature about the models that are most appropriate and effective for particular client groups, however, for this essay the Brokerage Model and Strengths-Based Model will be the compared models of case management.
Their mission will guide them to make more informed choices about what they fund, give support to, and why they started their organization. Their vision statement
The focus is more on the individual than the problem. The client is viewed as unique and their own way. As the practitioner you have to treat your client situation as its own. The practitioner serve as a help to assist the client whit their choices they want to make .The practitioner helps the client by eliminating what is in the way of the client reaching their goal.
1. Introduction to Organisational Structures The Organizational Structure within a company determines the way in which an organization’s operational activities are performed. Some of the main operations defined within an organizational structure include the allocation, supervision, and coordination of how a project is to be completed. The organizational structure will determine how tasks are performed during a project and who the tasks are to be performed by. The organizational structure also states who will manage or oversee the project and the processes or protocols that will be implemented during the time frame of that particular project.
Mission statements are typically future focused and are not essentially constructed on present-day. They should be a reasonable viewpoint from which to look down the road. These statements should not bound the development of the organization’s premises through incorrect
It relates to the purpose of the company and what they want to achieve in the future. The mission goes beyond the vision as it explains the company’s goals and objectives more clearly. It also mentions how this will be accomplished. The last step is to create a strategy based on the defined vision and mission. (Miller, 2014) Tesla’s mission is ‘to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by bringing compelling mass market electric cars to market as soon as possible’.
The basic functions like legal and tax issues, benefits, EDI, credit and collection, and financial control systems were administrated from this centralized corporate office. Exhibit_8 shows the company’s organization chart as on October 1998. Board of directors chairman W.P Sovey followed by vice chairman & CEO J.J McDonough and president & COO T.A Ferguson represents the very top corporate leadership. Under them, top financial responsibilities were divided between two corporate executives: Vice President-Finance who managed outside asset and liability, and senior vice president-Corporate Controller who focused on internal operations. They reported directly to company president and president reported to CEO.
They developed a back-office accounting software product. They believed that flat organisational structure, collegial culture would strengthen employee morale and also heighten company performance. With 25% of client renewal rate and most of the clients retained services for at least 4 years, the firm earned good revenues. It had about $100 million in revenues and 400+ employees in its regional offices. The founders retired and the new CEO looked for young sales directors.
This compare and contrast paper will explore the history and development of these two corporate giants; conduct a strategic and financial analysis of each company; and compare and contrast the executive leadership, corporate strategy, acquisitions and divestments of each. The future direction of the companies over the next three to five
Ford motor company 's organizational structure is based on business requirements under the condition of different markets around the world. Enterprise organization structure defines the components and their interaction system configuration. In the case of ford, the organization structure is directly related to the status of the global auto industry. Ford 's international operations also decided against competition and the key structure components required for market risk. In this respect, as the second largest U.S. automakers ford is to show the effectiveness of its organisational structure to support continuous business growth and high performance.
The enterprise’s competitive advantage is their excellent customer service which requires “highly motivated staff” in order all of tasks required to provide the service with high quality. The enterprise has its own culture which
Organisations have long struggled to retain employees without pouring in too many resources into incentives, however there are many other factors that influence the motivation for an employee to work for an organisation. The following factors are very important to retaining employees: ➔ Vision and Mission: Each organisation has a vision set by its leaders, a ground basis on which it stands for. This vision is the key for driving innovation, research and development for the company. Vision is also the driving force and motivation for its employees, to push their limits and to outperform the competition.
(a) Background information on the companies. (Describe your companies’ profile and core business activities.) In this assignment, the 2 companies selected in a same industry are Hup Seng Industries BHD. and Apollo Food Holdings BHD.
Toyota Revolves around its organizational structure, culture, climate and decision making perspectives. All these factors impact Toyota’s ability to make decision and then take actions. Failure to acknowledge anyone of them in a sensible way might damage a company’s reputation. Lets discuss these factors in detail. Organizational Structure is the framework of the company which lays down the foundation of the company.
Formation Bosch is a German multinational engineering and electronics company headquartered in Gerlingen, near Stuttgart. It is the world's largest supplier of automotive components. The company was founded by Robert Bosch in Stuttgart in 1886.