ipl-logo

Coker V. GA 1977 Case Study

717 Words3 Pages

Coker V GA 1977 is a case in which the petitioner Ehrlich Anthony Coker was convicted and sentenced to death for rape. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court in which the court overturned the ruling saying it violated the Eighth Amendment as being cruel and unusual punishment.

The petitioner Ehrlich Anthony Coker was already in prison for various crimes such as murder, rape, kidnapping and aggravated assault, when he escaped from the correctional facility in Georgia. After escaping the facility, Mr. Coker entered into a home of a couple through an unlocked door. Mr. Coker tied the male subject up and then proceeded to rape the male subject’s wife. Mr. Coker had taken the keys to the family car and proceeded to leave …show more content…

The case was then heard before the United States Supreme Court. Four Supreme Court justices, Justice White, Justice Stewart, Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens all concluded the sentence of death for the crime of rape is grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment is is therefore forbidden by the Eighth Amendment as cruel and unusual punishment (Coker v Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 1977). There was some variation however, between the other Justice’s sitting in on the ruling. Justice Brennan found the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Justice Marshall found the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Justice Powell found that death is disproportionate punishment for the crime of raping an adult woman where, as here, the crime was not committed with excessive brutality and the victim did not sustain serious or lasting injury (Coker v Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 1977). The United States Supreme Court reversed the decision by the lower courts even though, not all were in agreement saying the sentence of death for rape would be disproportionate and excessive punishment making the sentence unconstitutional. Justice Powell disagreed because he believed the plurality had gone too far in holding that capital punishment is always a …show more content…

The death penalty is a bit extreme for a rape case especially when the victim was not brutally beaten or killed in the commission of the crime. Now if he had kidnapped, raped and tortured her and then killed her, yes, I can see the death penalty being enforced. Even though Justice Powell stated in his decision, the victim did not suffer serious or lasting injury, I would have to disagree with that statement. Victims of rape always have a lasting injury but that injury is usually not a physical injury, but however, a mental injury that will traumatize the victim for the rest of their life. Even if an injury cannot be seen does not mean injury has not occurred. It still would not have changed the outcome of the decision

Show More
Related

  • Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his conviction, his death sentence, and the denial of post-conviction relief, Simmons sought a writ of habeas corpus from the court, arguing that the prohibitions on “cruel and unusual punishment” imposed by article I section 21 of the Missouri Construction and by the Eight Amendment of the United States Construction bar the execution of an individual who committed a capital crime when under the age of eighteen” (EIGHTH AMENDMENT -- DEATH PENALTY -- MISSOURI SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT THE JUVENILE DEATH PENALTY VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. ,

    Read More

  • Gregg V. Georgia Case Brief Summary

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gregg v. Georgia Ware, 1 Gregg v. Georgia: Death Penalty Cheyenne Ware Liberty High School 3AB ? Gregg v. Georgia, decided July 2, 1976, was a case that has influenced a lot of cases after it. This is due to the fact it defined it the constitutionality of the death penalty and how extreme of an offence one must commit in order to receive the death penalty, as well as overturning the decision of Furman v. Georgia (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015 A) (Cornell University, 2015). In Furman v. Georgia, Furman was in the process of robbing is home when a resident of the home noticed him.

    Read More

  • What Is The Supreme Court Case Of Coker Vs Georgia

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    The people charge him for all of these crimes and he was found guilty by a jury in the Superior Court of Georgia. He was sentenced to death under the Georgia statutes that permitted capital punishment for aggravated crimes. Crimes committed before, convicted for murder a capital felony, moral corruption, and committing the crime after escaping jails were all aggravated factors. Coker appealed his sentencing to death for the rape charge stating that sentencing death for rape violated the eight Amendment. The eight amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, which means the punishment has to match the crime and can not be excessive in comparison to the crime

    Read More

  • Persky Vs Brock-Turner Essay

    361 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the January 29, The Stanford Daily editorial Stanford, California, it debates the different essential of the principle of morality and identified Brock Turner had applied a use of force in raping an unconscious woman behind the dumpster. Furthermore, the young man attended Stanford University and participated in his college swim team dreamt of partaking in the Olympus. The victim heartfelt statement during the trial is disregarded because he comes from a class of privilege and is a man. Not to mention, Brock Turner’s father wrote a letter to expressing the universalizability to court saying, “my son’s life shouldn’t be ruined over 20 minutes of action (Dreher,Rod).” Therefore, Aaron Persky who is a California judge implemented an ethical decision that contemplated the clarity around both the specific choice and decision then declared a six months sentenced ruling.

    Read More

  • Ehrlich Coker Case

    943 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Court also noted that most states declined to impose as harsh a penalty as death. Georgia was the only state that authorized the death penalty for rape of an adult woman. Rape does not involve taking another human life therefore, the Court found the death penalty was excessive in severity and revocability (Oyez, n.d.). The Court also stated that in Georgia since 1973, for most of rape convictions, the juries have not imposed the death. That Georgia was one of only two states that allowed the death penalty when the victim was a child (Oyez,

    Read More

  • Furman V. Georgia Case Study

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    The case Furman v Georgia made it all the to the supreme court because it would affect the way the whole country delivered punishment. Although it surprised many people that it made it that far because most people were for capital punishment. Michael Meltsner said,”Georgia was a shock. Before LDF's anti-capital punishment campaign, there had been no successful court challenge of the death penalty — even when it had been handed down in a blatantly racist or totally arbitrary manner” (www.michealmeltsner.com/interview.html). .

    Read More

  • The Erlich Coker's Murder Case

    751 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a 7-2 conclusion, the Supreme Court ruled that recieving a death sentence for raping a woman was a “grossly disproportionate” punishment and that the death sentence enforced should be reversed and overturned. Because the rape did not involve murder, the Court decided that the death penalty was disproportionate and unreasonable punishment, therefore being considered unconstitutional (cruel and unusual

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Criminal Justice Case

    791 Words  | 4 Pages

    Additionally, the Court looked into capital punishment practices in other countries. At the time they began hearing the case, the United States was the only country that still had the death penalty as an available sentencing option for juveniles who were found guilty of murder (Arvin, 2005). Justice Scalia, Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Thomas, and Justice O’Connor had a dissenting opinion of the case (Williams, 2005). The dissent was primarily questioning if there was now a national consensus that juveniles would not be sentenced to death.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Essay

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    The most important issue that must be addressed in this case is the principle of the “evolving standards of decency” and the uses of a national consensus. The “evolving standards of decency” were developed by Trop v. Dulles and have been implemented in one way or another in all of the precedents dealing with “cruel and unusual” punishment. It is important to treat these principles as an important aspect of “cruel and unusual” punishment jurisprudence, therefore turning from these set of principles would be foolish and a disregard for every precedent. However, it is important to acknowledge that each case satisfies the standards by using a different method; some use the presence or lack of state legislature as a judgment of consensus while others look at foreign countries.

    Read More

  • The Furman V. Georgia Case Of 1972

    213 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the problems that was the way it was administered. Justice Douglas stated that the death penalty violates the eighth amendment because if the death penalty discriminates against people

    Read More

  • Suspending The Death Penalty: Furman V. Georgia

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Suspending the Death Penalty In 1972 in Furman v. Georgia, Jackson v. Georgia, and Branch v. Texas (known collectively as the landmark case Furman v. Georgia (408 U.S. 238), the issue of unpredictability of the death penalty was again be conveyed before the Supreme Court. Capital Cases results in in arbitrary and capricious sentencing, said Furman. Under the Eighth Amendment, Furman was a challenge, different to McGautha which is a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim. By a vote from 5 to 4 and in 9 separate opinions, the court apprehended that Georgia’s death penalty decree could result in haphazard condemning, which bequeathed the jury widespread sentencing discretion.

    Read More

  • The Eighth Amendment Summary

    428 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment prohibits inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on citizens. The judicial branch must ensure that the rights and privileges granted to American people by the Constitution are provided equally regardless of their race, sex, or sexual identification (Edmondson, 2017). John Doe after serving two years of a five-year sentence for manufacturing methamphetamines, escapes from prison by hiding in the back of a milk truck. When the milk truck makes its first stop, inmate Doe climbs out of the milk truck and walks away without anyone’s assistance. Inmate Doe manages to find a new set of clothes, catches a ride with a stranger, and shows up at a friend’s home.

    Read More

  • Does The Death Penalty Violate The 8th Amendment

    405 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Atkins v. Virginia (2002), the court ruled that the mentally retarded should not be tried for death penalty because they do not bear the proper guilt that even the worst adult criminal bears upon committing a crime. The mentally retarded have trouble reasoning and controlling their

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The American Criminal Justice System

    1115 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the United States, the death penalty is often used unfairly in situations where it is clear that the defendant is not guilty of the crime or that the defendant is not deserving of the punishment. The appropriate use of the death penalty is very subjective. This is due to the fact that there are very few guidelines, and it is mostly up to the jury and judge to decide whether or not to impose the death penalty when the defendant is guilty of a capital crime. The judge can look at many factors, such as history, the regret of the crime, and the nature of the crime when deciding (U.S. Dept. of Justice). Additionally, in 2009, all five of the women who were on Alabama's death row were condemned for the unexplained deaths of their young children, spouses, or boyfriends.

    Read More

  • Ehrlich Anthony Coker Case

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Supreme Court heard and ruled 7 to 2 decision it was unconstitutional to impose a death punishment on someone for rape. The court reasoned that punishments violate the Eighth Amendment of the are “excessive in relation to the crime committed”, that determination about excessiveness are properly informed by the “country’s present Judgement” and that the Georgia law could not survive this type of inquiry because no other state subjected persons convicted of the rape of an adult woman to execution. Moreover the Court explained the Eighth Amendment bars not only those punishments that are “barbaric” but also those that are “excessive” and unconstitutional if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering, or is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime (pp. 433 U.S. 591-592). ‘The death is disproportionate penalty for rape is strongly indicated by the objective evidence of present public judgement, as represented by the attitude of state legislatures and sentencing juries, concerning the acceptability of such a penalty, it only State authorizing the death sentence, it appearing that Georgia is currently the only state authorizing the death sentence for rape of an adult woman, that it is authorized for rape in only two other states, but only when the victim is a child, and that in vast majority of rape convictions in Georgia

    Read More

More about Coker V. GA 1977 Case Study

Open Document